How do I choose these two SLRs?

Buying a DSLR is not just about buying only one body, but also about the choice of the entire system.

As the saying goes, the lens of iron is the body of running water, which means that the body will be changed in a few years, but the lens system that you save will not change.

Pentax has a small group of lenses, and it is not easy to buy, on the contrary, there are many Canon things, but the good things are more expensive.

If you are willing to accept a second-hand phone, you can buy a Canon 20d second-hand 2000 or so, Nikon's classic models have D70 second-hand 1800 or so D80 second-hand 3600 or so It's your own business to choose the door, and you can enter whichever side you like. However, there is a sentence first, Nikon's lenses are generally more generous at a low price, and Canon's lenses are really better at the first level.

Finally, I highly recommend playing with second-hand equipment, I am a student, I don't have so much money to toss, and photographic lenses are a very special second-hand market. The lens has a low disassembly rate and is easy to identify. Second-hand lenses have a high retention rate.

If you originally bought a second-hand lens, you won't lose much money when you replace it and sell it online or on the market. Just learn a lot.

20d is too old and maybe the shutter count is too high.

It mainly depends on how much budget you have to recommend it.

The KM is a good entry machine, and the recent KX is also very good and more compact.

Although second-hand equipment is cheap, it is still easy for novices to be fooled.

And 20d is really old. The parameters are seriously backward in all aspects, and to put it bluntly, except that the fuselage is alloyed, it is useless compared to KM. The most annoying thing is that the fuselage will not automatically remove dust.

There is also a fixed focal head novice who is easily restricted. Not suitable for prime use.

Canon is highly recommended, because the charm of photography is great, and once you go in, you will be fascinated, and it is recommended that you choose Canon, which is really of undoubted quality, and that with the body, you can ask your photographer to borrow a lens to use.

20d don't buy it.

A digital camera is even a DSLR, unless it's an invincible rabbit or something.

You buy 20d, the imaging quality is not as good as **3-digit number, such as 500d, and other machines.

The newer and more advanced digital products are, 40d is not good, and you still buy 20d? Novices buy a 500d20d, and the display looks disgusting.

It seems that you will not invest heavily in SLR in the future, recommend Pentax K52 or K5.

Pentax K52 is the strongest mid-range flagship.

There is no suspense in the Pentax K52 beyond the D7000. K5 and K52 are all-metal bodies, three-proof machines, open decoration companies, dust-proof, dustproof is the most critical.

The others are plastic machines, and the sealing is relatively poor.

Pentax K5 series are all waterproof.

This machine is the Pentax K5 machine. Canon and Nikon with poor sealing are not good for low-end machines.

The main difference between intermediate and entry level is in the focusing system.

In addition, the D7000 is a semi-metal body.

There is not much difference in image quality.

The budget is more than D7000

The budget is 600d less

If it's just a pat on the shoulder.

600d with a 50 can also choose 18 55 sleeve.

D3200 or D3100 will do. It's the cheapest SLR. Don't look at 3100, it's less than 3000, in fact, it's just a flip screen with D5100, and I personally feel that it may not be wrong to choose a cheap one.

I used to be ready to buy D5100, but the Thai hair water was out of stock, and the D3100 I bought is also good for use now.

Personally push Nikon D7000 mid-range machine,It's better than the entry-level one,Of course, the silver is also a little more expensive.,I've watched a few of the ones you've watched.,The cost performance or something is still d7000 good。

Personally, I like that Nikon imaging is better than Canon, and there is definitely no need to compare intermediate and entry-level.

But if you want to consider silver, the first two are casual, and there is not much difference between the entry, so it's best to go to a physical store to feel it, so you know.

If you have less money, you can choose Pentax K30, and if you have more money, you can choose from Pentax K52 Nikon D7000.

K30 is a K52 without a screen,Stand-alone only2500,There is indeed a metal skeleton,Three-proof,Pentaprism,Mid-range machines such as double wave wheels have a function。

K52 has been introduced downstairs, D7000 is stronger than K52 in the coverage of the focus point, but you see you shoot still life, so K52 is more suitable for you.

It's still 60d! Although the D7000 is a semi-metal body! But if you shoot people, the color is very difficult to grasp! 60d, it's okay to use!!

The Nikon D7000 is recommended, the contrast ratio of Nikon imaging is higher than that of Canon, so the shooting effect is more vivid, and it is suitable for shooting landscapes.

Step on it.,I want to buy it too.,It's also these models that are compared.,There's no idea.,Sometimes I want to buy a Canon 70D ruthlessly.,This one is new in 13 years.,The appearance function is quite strong.。

If you don't have a fever for pure work, choose an entry-level one. Try to choose a lens with a large aperture for indoor photography, 50 fixed focus is cheap, and the imaging is good. The 18-55 pullover is definitely a flash for indoor use.

Tamron's 17-50 has been used, and it's still good. At the end of the day, image quality is determined by the lens. As for the imaging style, the Nikon's contrast and sharpness should be higher than the Canon's.

It is recommended to learn the introductory machine, and jump directly to the professional level after learning it. 3200 is good, 2400 pixels to play with D7000 is not for you.

Those who buy Canon generally fancy the soft color, those who buy Nikon generally fancy the sharp color, those who buy Binder generally fancy the noble background, those who buy Olympus generally fancy the appearance, those who buy Ricoh generally fancy the old optics, those who buy Laika are generally very rich, those who buy Fujifilm are generally blind to the parameters, those who buy Sony are generally fooled by advertising, those who buy Panasonic are generally ignorant, those who buy Casio are generally extremely ignorant, and those who buy Patriot are generally pro-domestic products. Those who buy BenQ are generally in the brain.

It is undeniable that Sony can rank among the top 3 in the consumer DC market, thanks to the good reputation of the previous home appliance industry, I have also purchased a lot of Sony products (color TV, CD, DV, USB flash drive, ***, recorder), I even think that other companies in the home appliance industry are unsurpassed. In fact, many Sony users choose Sony without knowing anything about the camera. We all know that Sony's products have always been of high quality and high price, why is his SLR even if it uses Zeiss lenses, but it is much cheaper than Nikon Canon in the same grade?

Sony products are all-encompassing, home appliances, IT mobile phones, cameras, ......Compared with Nikon, what is "specialized"? The current SLR market is undoubtedly Canon Nikon's world, which is an ironclad fact!

As for the Canon 600D and Nikon D5100, it is difficult to say who is better than whom, only that the level is comparable and the style is different. However, since the focus is on clear and gorgeous picture quality, Nikon is slightly better. (Canon tends to be light and soft).

All four are entry-level machines, and it is said that the best is the best 550D, which is the best cost performance. If you are not in the budget, you can choose to enter D5000 or 500D, and then use 500D and D5000 to compare, I recommend you to buy 500D, 500D surpasses D5000 in all aspects of parameters. You can buy a set of 500D+18-55mm.

This is more affordable, and if you need to upgrade the lens, you can do it.

Lenses should not be mixed, for example, Canon's EF mount should use EF mount lenses. If you want to use Nikon lenses for Canon bodies, you need an adapter ring, and using an adapter ring will reduce the compatibility of the lens.

Don't talk about colors, with ps, colors are all floating clouds. It is recognized that Canon RAW produces thick colors and the largest post-production space.

In terms of these comparisons, the comprehensive performance is still the best A580, with high sensitivity, continuous shooting and image quality.

A580 is considered a mid-range machine configuration (except for a non-metallic body and a shoulderless screen) I recommend 580, although I am a C family.

D5100. Sony machines are basically unused. Canon low-end machine out of sliced meat. Isn't that D5100 left?

Of the three, I would choose the Canon 600D

I'm struggling with this as well, but I'm not going to think about Sony.

The best one at the moment is mirrorless! Easy to carry! It's easy! I use Sony.

1. The first choice of practice is likely to determine your future choice 2. Sony and Nikon are incomparable in terms of lens configuration.

3. The black spot in the viewfinder is not so exaggerated, there is nothing wrong with the attention point, anyway, you are just using it to practice.

4. D3100 is very cost-effective, but there is a little bit of an entry-level machine without a shoulder screen, and there is no mid-range cool operation.

5. You can buy a second-hand mid-range SLR when you practice hands, which is the right choice, but you need luck 6, D90 is only more than 5k, and it is also a good choice to save money for two months 7.

8. The entry-level machine does not feel good, it is very light and has no texture.

The viewfinder produces a black spot: not touched. If you don't have a body motor, you can buy a Nikon lens with a focus motor.

Sony has too little focus: it is an obstacle for those who don't understand, and it doesn't matter to those who do. The handling is also poor: it varies from person to person.

It is not recommended, Nikon sleeve 18-55 is a relatively poor sleeve in the industry, Sony's 18-55 is the best in the industry, but A390 is too old, it is a eliminated model, it is recommended to take a look at A35, a single electric with a complete SLR function.

Sony's low-end head quality is better than Canon, Nikon, and the high-end head also has Zeiss to choose from, the disadvantage is that the mid-end head is relatively lacking, it is recommended to choose 2 heads directly (18-55+55-200).

Cameras of this level, whether Sony, Nikon, Canon, have much focus, in comparison, Sony is quite a lot, and Nikon is indeed better than Sony, Canon in terms of control, but at this price, Nikon's performance is too poor, and Sony's additional features are highlights such as panoramic scanning.

I think to buy a DSLR, especially for beginners, or buy Canon, Nikon, Sony is not bad, if you continue to burn in the future, or Canon, Nikon's lens group is richer, and there is a lot of room for replacement.

For entry, Canon 600D, 1100D, Nikon D3100, D5100 are all okay, but Canon's entry-level camera focus points are all nine points, which is very little, but the entry is enough.

Also, the fuselage motor you are talking about is. Are you talking about focus motors?

Canon's SLR is very good, I personally like Canon EOS60D, with high configuration, clear imaging, and high cost performance, which is a new mid-level nirvana product of Canon. In addition, the compact and lightweight nature of the 60D plastic body also reduces the burden on users when carrying the camera when going out.