Can a large collider create a black hole?

In recent days, there has been a lot of discussion about whether China should build a large collider, and Yang Zhenning, who is a representative of China's construction of a large collider, still has a firm opposition.

When it comes to colliders, some people may remember reading articles about large colliders that can create black holes, and even articles that promote human destruction of the earth that say that black holes created by colliders will swallow the earth.

However, looking at the reasons given by Yang Zhenning and others for opposing China's construction of a large collider, it is nothing more than that the feast of the large collider has passed, and it is no longer easy to produce results by building a large collider, not to mention that it will cost a lot of money, and this money can be invested in other research fields. None of the scientists' objections mention that the black hole created by the collider would swallow the Earth.

So is it possible for the Large Collider to create a black hole? Theoretically, it is possible, and there are theories that the collider that China wants to build is enough energy to create a black hole, and even that the current Large Hadron Collider in Europe can also create a black hole. But no scientist has ever worried that the black hole created by the collider will swallow the earth, and on the contrary, they are very eager to detect the black hole created by the collider.

A star with a mass of more than 30 times the mass of the Sun will not be able to resist the gravitational collapse of the outward radiation from nuclear fusion in its later years, and eventually the star will collapse into a black hole. From here, it can be seen that as long as an object with mass can be compressed into a small enough space, that object becomes a black hole. The Large Collider can use this to create black holes.

The large collider can provide energy to charged particles, and according to Einstein's theory, there is a dimensional relationship between energy and mass, and if energy is provided to the particle, its mass will increase accordingly. Europe's Large Hadron Collider can accelerate the mass of protons to thousands of times their resting mass, and China's planned Large Hadron Collider will further increase its energy, and the collision of two particles head-on is equivalent to further increasing the energy or mass.

Can two particles with masses 10,000 times their rest mass collide head-on, and concentrate their entire mass below their Schwarzschild radius? There are a lot of very basic questions here, such as what is the radius of the particle? None of the current experiments have measured the lower limit of the particle radius, and the data given are the upper limit of the ionic radius.

Also, can the existing theories still hold up on a smaller scale? There are theories that at smaller scales, gravitational pull will increase more quickly, so that with the energy of existing colliders, black holes can already be created.

Why is no black hole detected? Why not worry about this black hole swallowing the Earth? Because almost all theories suggest that the lifetime of a black hole is related to its mass, the lifetime of such a very small black hole is so short that it evaporates before it can be measured.

If such black holes can be detected, many theories about black holes can be tested. So, physicists will look forward to the discovery of such black holes rather than fear that they will swallow the Earth.

Can the Great Collider create black holes? Can it devour everything on Earth? Scientists have given an explanation.

No. Because large colliders can only accelerate very small particles, and black holes require a lot of mass, large colliders cannot create black holes.

No, because the large collider is not that powerful, so it wants to create a black hole. At the very least, 100,000 atomic bombs must add up to that power.

It should not be possible, because the energy of the collider is finite, and it is impossible to create a black hole with enormous energy.

It is impossible for a collider to create a black hole, because black holes exist naturally, are innate, and cannot be created by man-made machines! This is because there is a problem in the current theory, which has led people's thinking to the left and deviated. There are many contradictions in the theory, such as the fact that the living environment of black holes is within the speed of light, which is not only contrary to the Lorentz equation, but also contrary to the science and technology that can effectively detect a certain existence.

Second, in the absence of gravity, why do black holes exist? Contrary to the theory of curvature. Third, the gravitational distortion is contrary to the relativistic theory of space.

In summary, the collision of the collider with particles to produce black holes is the logic of a short circuit in thought.

The Hadron Collider can't really create a black hole.

According to the nature of gravity described by Einstein's theory of relativity, it is impossible to create a tiny black hole inside the Large Hadron Collider. However, some pure theories predict that the Large Hadron Collider will produce this particle product. All of these theories suggest that such particles from the Large Hadron Collider will decompose immediately.

As a result, the black hole it creates will have no time to concentrate the matter and produce visible results.

Unlike the collision of celestial bodies such as the Earth and cosmic rays, the new particles produced during the collision in the LHC generally travel more slowly than the particles produced by cosmic rays. Stable black holes are either charged or neutral.

Whether it's particles produced by cosmic rays or particles produced by the Large Hadron Collider, if they are charged, they can bind to ordinary matter, and the process stops as the particles travel through the Earth. The fact that the Earth still exists precludes the possibility that cosmic rays or the Large Hadron Collider could create tiny black holes that are charged and dangerous.

When we talk about black holes, the first thing that comes to mind is definitely the well-known giant mass black hole at the center of the Milky Way. In fact, our galaxies are full of black holes, except that they are slightly less relative. Most black holes are four or five times more massive than sunlight, and they are not very large, with an event horizon of about 12 kilometers.

But there must be countless black holes in the galaxy, they are an unavoidable remnant of the ephemeral life of very large stars. Black holes, even very large ones, are very fine in the infinite space, like the eye of a very fine needle. Even if a large black hole is about 10 billion times the mass of the Sun, their event horizon can only reach Jupiter's orbit, and all the chemicals in the black hole, including light, cannot escape.

4.5 billion kilometers or light years.

The star composition of galaxies is likely to exceed the 100,000 light-years without fat black holes in the solar system, the larger black holes here are only 4 million to 5 million solar masses, and they are lying in ambush around the center of the Milky Way, with their event horizon only slightly larger than the radius of the sun, and their analysis shows that the force required to create a black hole is much less than previously calculated. And, perhaps at least in part, because of this discovery, biologists are gradually taking on a new hidden danger. They worry that the synthetic Medium and Large Hadron Collider will raise the probability that a black hole that can swallow the world will have indelible adverse effects, even if it is very small.

The news has made everyone worry that the black hole experiment brand figuratively says that it is equivalent to bringing the sun closer to the earth and thus making it dangerous. According to the experiments carried out by the Large and Medium Hadron Collider (LHC) of the European Regional Nuclear Science Research Agency, it is possible to open up an external economic black hole with devastating adverse effects of uncertainty. These concerns arose before the operation of the Large and Medium Hadron Collider, an 8-kilometer circular network accelerator with an outer diameter around Geneva, Switzerland, Germany.

Black hole is a unique star confirmed by experts according to the indirect observation of the omen, it has been favored by many scientific and reasonable work judges and astronomy enthusiasts for its strong attraction, great ability to destroy work, ubiquitous and immeasurable mysteries, and the scientific research on black holes is of key practical significance for everyone to carry out deep space excavation and detection and grasp the law of star generation and evolution. In the super-large-scale cosmic environment, the core view of the emergence of black holes today is closely related to the intrinsic mass of stars and their development trends. There are two mass limits that determine the final destination of massive stars.

It will not threaten the Earth, because even if a black hole is created, it is only a miniature black hole, and it will exist for a short time.

Physicists have pointed out that with the current manufacturing technology of human beings, it is completely incapable of creating micro-positive black holes, because the so-called large particle collider is actually not large, at least far from the stupid power to make black holes. Because if you want to accelerate the speed of particles to the speed of light, even the energy of the entire solar system is not enough. Even if the so-called miniature black hole is created, it will not be harmful, because the Hawking radiation theory tells us that when the diameter of the black hole is too small, it will be very short-lived, and it will basically evaporate instantly before it has time to swallow the surrounding matter.

Therefore, human beings do not have to worry about man-made miniature black holes engulfing the earth.

I don't think so, because even if human power can create black holes, then it is not very powerful.

It is indeed possible that a future supercollider will produce a black hole, because the force it produces is infinite, and it may destroy some structures in the universe.

It is possible, as long as the energy generated by the collision between particles is high enough to create a miniature black hole.

Is it possible for a future super collider to create a black hole?

Scientific thinking must have basic logic.

What black hole is not a black hole? What white hole is not white hole?

In astrophysics, only stars have an earth-axis and a magnetic axis.

It's possible to create a time tunnel!

Will the Earth eventually be destroyed by a black hole? The success of the Super Collider experiment will lead to the creation of the first artificial black hole.

The mass of the black hole produced by the hadron collider is very small, and once the black hole produces mass, it will continue to decrease, and the smaller the mass of the black hole, the faster the mass decreases. These black holes disappear in a very short period of time, with negligible impact.