One monk carries water to drink, ten monks have no water to drink, who knows why?

Because nine more people drank the water at once.

The synopsis of the story is that there was a broken temple on a mountain in the past, one day, a short monk was going to the broken temple on the mountain, passing through a river, because the weather was very hot, he went to the nearby pool to drink water, he came to the temple, saw that the tank in the temple was out of water, so he picked up water, added water to Guanyin's bottle, and the dry willow also revived. Soon after, a fat monk also came to the temple, because of the heat, to the pool to drink water, he came to the temple to drink the water in the temple, and picked a bucket, after which both of them were reluctant to carry water, and then they realized that this could not be done, so the two of them carried water, but the distribution was always uneven, they both wanted to take advantage, and finally the two drew a jumper on the pole, and finally calmed down the turmoil. Soon after, a thin monk came to the temple, due to the heat, to the pool to drink water, he came to the temple to drink the water in the temple, and picked a bucket, after the three were unwilling to carry water, the willow also thanked, and finally the air dried dry, rats were rampant, caused a fire, the three of them struggled to put out the fire.

After the turmoil subsided, the three worked together to fetch water.

A monk carries water to drink, two monks carry water to drink, three monks have no water to drink, this is a fable, the moral is: to do one thing, if there is no system as a guarantee, the responsibility is not implemented, but there are many people but can not do things Why do three monks have no water to drink? Because the three monks belong to the same mentality and the same state of mind, they don't want to contribute, they want to rely on others, and they pass the buck to each other on the issue of getting water, and as a result, no one goes to get water, so that everyone has no water to drink.

From the three monks who had no water to drink, to the three monks who achieved the common goal through different methods, the key lies in not being limited to the inherent thinking, and carrying forward the spirit of unity and cooperation, healthy competition, and pioneering and innovation.

One monk carries water to drink, two monks carry water to drink, and three monks have no water to drink, this is a well-known story. The story is very simple, but the moral of the illustration is profoundIt mainly shows that if there is no good distribution of personnel, it is likely that there will be personnel passing the buck to each other, resulting in the phenomenon of not being able to do things well.

Many times ago, there was a monk living in a temple, and he had to go to a distant place every day to fetch water to drink, and later, another monk came, and they carried the water to the mountain to drink together. In the end, another monk came to the temple, but the three monks prevaricated, none of them wanted to carry water, so the three of them had no water to drink.

This story also happens a lot in our lives. If the leader gives a person who is responsible for the task to the three people, and does not explain who is mainly responsible for this task, then this task is likely to be completed poorly. They all thought that I wasn't the only one in charge anyway, so they would just do it casually.

Doing it back and forth, the results made by these three people may not be as good as the results made by one person.

People are inert, and when many people go to do a task, there will be prevarication. You push me, I push you, and in the end, I don't know who will do this task, and then everyone won't do it.

This story also teaches us that when assigning tasks, we must align our responsibilities and arrange our respective work tasks. In this way, everyone can do their best to do what they should do, instead of thinking about others doing their part. In particular, as leaders, we should pay special attention to the appointment of personnel and make effective use of resources.

Summary. It means "a monk is thirsty, he can carry water to drink; When the two monks are thirsty, they carry water to drink together, saving time and effort; When there were three monks, none of the monks wanted to carry water for others to drink, and the two of them felt that it was unfair, so no one carried water, and they died of thirst."

What does it mean for one monk to carry water to drink, and three monks to drink without water.

It means "when a monk is thirsty, he can ask himself to carry water to drink; When the two monks are thirsty, they carry water to drink together, saving time and effort; When there were three monks, none of the monks wanted to carry water for others to drink, and the two of them felt unfair together, so no one carried water, so Ye Jian died of thirst and death."

From the Chinese folk proverb "Three Monks".

Implication: To do one thing, if there is no system as a guarantee, the responsibility is constantly blocked, and there are many people who can't do it. It shows that the division of collective responsibilities is not clear, the competition mechanism is not perfect, the reward and punishment mechanism is not effective, the members are not balanced and united, and there is no team spirit.

In fact, the three monks can also have water to drink and search, as long as they are organized a little, and a system of taking turns to take water is established, the responsibility is put on the person, and the violator is severely punished, so that there is water to drink. It's like sweeping the floor in a class, whoever is going to be the one today.

There are many people, and it doesn't matter.

One monk carries water to drink, two monks carry to drink, and three monks have no water to drink" is a very familiar fable, which is a natural and non-** state from the perspective of management. If we use different management methods to solve the problem of "water" for the three monks, the effect will be very different:

The first is to stipulate that the three monks take turns to carry water every day to ensure that the day's drinking water is provided. It can be described as institutional innovation, with clear responsibilities, rights and interests.

The second type: each time you pick up water, a monk picks a distance, and then hands it to the second monk, picks a section and then hands it to the third monk, and the third monk picks it up until it is poured into the water tank.

The third type: the three monks use the bamboo tube in the mountains to drain the water into the temple ....... It can be described as scientific and technological innovation.

I haven't showered in over a week, can you believe me?