If you quarrel with someone and drop someone else s phone first, is it considered to be the first to

If you quarrel with someone else and drop someone else's mobile phone first, then you must do it first, and at least you have to compensate for the loss with others.

It must be counted, because this will directly escalate the verbal conflict to the conflict between hands and feet, and you also need to compensate for other people's mobile phones.

has dropped other people's mobile phones, of course, this is the first to do it, in this case, you will definitely have to pay for other people's mobile phones.

If the quarrel depends on the real situation and whether the environment is a verbal conflict, if the other party misses some insulting language, causing an agitated situation, then this judgment is different, so what happened before the phone fell, what some video data can prove to do it first, of course, this also requires a certain amount of mediation.

It's the first to do it, but if you drop someone's mobile phone, you must be compensated, otherwise it will make things bigger and bigger.

If you quarrel with others, don't drop your phone first, in fact, we don't just do it easily, as long as you have money now, you can do it, but we don't want to fight back, we all have a chance.

This must have been done first, and you have to compensate for dropping someone else's phone.

This is not a hands-on operation, but it can be regarded as deliberately destroying other people's finances, and it can also be held responsible.

Of course, the mobile phone with the tone of the voice is hands-on, not to mention how people's mobile phones are always people's mobile phones, this must be you first, you say you first.

Dropping other people's mobile phones, this is not the first to do it, destroying other people's property is not right.

It doesn't matter if you do it first or not, the key is to compensate for dropping someone's mobile phone.

Dropping someone else's phone first, I think this is a particularly bad behavior, you better have something to say, or do it first.

I think if you hurt someone, you should be 100 percent responsible. Although the other party's quarrel scolded you first, the person did not hit you, or you injured the other person with your own hand first. Yours is wrong.

You can argue with him and reason, but don't do it. It's not right to hit someone, and if you hurt someone again, then you should pay for medical expenses, all nursing expenses, etc., etc. So then you go from being reasonable to being unreasonable.

Although it is wrong for her to swear, you can ignore her and ignore her. He scolded him for being out of breath, and he couldn't fight like this. So you're still in your place, and you're not going to be hurt yet.

Later pass such things to be calm. Lessons learned. Don't hit anyone.

Eighty, because whoever does it first is more responsible, and you also injured someone, and you have to pay for the medical bills of others.

Look at the cause of the matter. But you are taking the initiative and your responsibility is more than half. When it comes to the specific proportion of responsibility, it is generally in court, and the judge will make a decision based on the results of the investigation.

Half of each "swearing" should be beaten.

When two people quarreled, one party hit the person first, and the other party fought back, which is not justified defense.

Zhengzhi when the defense should meet the four DAO conditions:

One. The justifiable defense must be directed against the unlawful offense;

Two. It must be at the time when the wrongful encroachment is ongoing;

Three. The justifiable defence must be directed against the wrongdoer;

Four. Justifiable defence cannot go beyond certain limits.

Each side hits 50 As long as there is no blood, the police will not care if there is no death.

No, if the other party is injured, a certain amount of compensation should be given.

It also falls under self-defense. But excessive self-defence warrants compensation.

If the victim is injured by copying and is judged to be minor or seriously injured by a forensic medical examiner, he is suspected of the crime of intentional injury and shall bear criminal responsibility.

If the injury is slightly injured by a forensic medical examiner, it is a violation of the administration of public security, and the public security organ may detain it for not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days, and impose a fine of not less than 200 yuan but not more than 500 yuan.

Article 234 of China's Criminal Law stipulates that the act of intentionally and unlawfully harming the body of another person is the crime of intentional injury.

It is usually manifested as destroying the integrity of human tissues, such as cutting off fingers, gouging eyes, etc., and destroying the normal functions of human organs, such as loss of hearing, neurological dysfunction, etc. However, these acts of harm must be unlawful, and if they injure another person's body as a result of lawful acts such as legitimate self-defense, they do not constitute the crime of intentional injury.

Where torture extorts confessions or violently collects evidence, causing injury or disability, it is to be convicted and given a heavier punishment as the crime of intentional injury.

Gather the crowd"Smash and rob"and where a person is injured, it is to be convicted and punished in accordance with the crime of intentional injury.

When arguing, the other person moves first.

Hand strikes are to be dealt with in accordance with the consequences of the injuries caused. If it constitutes a minor injury or more, it shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years. A: If a minor injury is caused, the Public Security Administration Punishment Act shall be imposed.

Article 234 of the Criminal Law stipulates that whoever intentionally injures the body of another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release.

Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, causing serious injury, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years; Whoever causes death or seriously injures a person by especially cruel means, causing serious disability, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment, or death. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

Article 43 of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law: Whoever assaults another person, or intentionally harms another person's body, is to be detained for not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days, and is also fined between 200 and 500 RMB; where the circumstances are more minor, they are to be detained for up to 5 days or fined up to 500 RMB.

1) Gang up to beat or injure others;

2) Beating or injuring persons with disabilities, pregnant women, persons under the age of 14, or persons over the age of 60;

3) Repeatedly beating or injuring others, or beating or injuring multiple people at a time.

There was a quarrel with a barbershop, but he did it first, how to solve it.

You need to look at the details to determine the responsibility! In principle, those who intentionally injure the body of others shall bear administrative and criminal responsibility in the following different circumstances: 1. Those who cause minor injuries shall be sentenced to public security detention and fines;

2. Whoever causes minor injuries shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release;

3. Whoever causes serious injury shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years;

Unless justified defense.

It is necessary to distinguish whether it is a slight injury or a minor injury, and it depends on the source of the quarrel, the witness, and then compensation or something, maybe it is not your fault, but it does hurt the other party, and there is definitely no problem if it is slightly injured.

I'm just defending myself.

Of course, you have to do it first.

You should try to follow her whenever you come, so that she feels bai

You have her feelings in your heart, as for her quarreling with others, try to help her dao, don't fight with others at every turn, otherwise she will think that you like to fight very much, unless it is true. Why do such couples still want to be together, two people fall in love, not to torture each other, tear each other apart, love is to understand each other, support each other, give each other the best care, should be a good process to enjoy,

You, as her boyfriend, shouldn't watch her do her hands and say goodbye.

Zhi people, as a bystander, should be persuaded to fight, after figuring out the cause and effect of the pre-commission, and then subordinate to the conclusion who is right and who is wrong, two people together, one party has something wrong, the other party should put forward it for him to correct, instead of doing nothing, since we are together, we must have mistakes and correct together, and make progress together and run in with each other, so that it is good for everyone.

You can whisper and scold him while others don't hear it, but you must not do it, try to anger him, if he wants to do it, you will be justified, you can tell others that the old man will do it first.

In any case, working with the elderly will lower your personality, so the best way to meet an unreasonable elderly person is to stay away. Even if he finds a move, you should meet a madman, don't care, don't fight to win, if you don't fight, you win, it's character that wins.

Yes, if there is a disturbance from the family, they can sue them for obstructing official business. Remember the whole family.

The Nine Confucians only spoke for the elderly.

It is recommended not to fight back, call the police directly, rely on your flexibility to minimize the damage to yourself, go further, let the old man chase you, and then in the process, he falls, the fall has nothing to do with you, and after calling the police, you can ask for an apology, moral compensation, and may get compensation for lost work, the police will detain and fine. Summary: Reduce your own losses, cause greater losses to the other party, and do not do loss-making transactions.

What's the matter, your grandfather can't do it.

At that age, the stranger has avoided the main, and everyone will think that he is a high-quality young man.

Now, no matter what kind of person you meet, you're not the first to meet and you're not going to be the last. You can smash everything you have without hitting anyone and run away. If he's angry, you're just paying for money, not a criminal offense.

It's an act of self-defense, you deserve to die, don't lose money, I've never been cowardly when I fought.

No, although our country has a law on legitimate defense, it is not fully implemented in accordance with the law when it is actually implemented, and secondly, the elderly as a vulnerable group are easy to arouse the sympathy of others, so if you hit the elderly, it will be very troublesome, and it is recommended that you walk away immediately.

There are indeed a lot of people who are disrespectful to the old now, so you should endure it again and again, and hurry up and stay away from these potential porcelain players.

No, he won't go back when he kills you, as long as you shoot down, it's all your fault, no matter if you were right or wrong before, you are wrong when you do it.

No, he's also an old man.

Absolutely not, if you do it, you're in trouble!

That's self-defense, and the compensation is also the cost of your medicine when you go to the hospital.

You do it first, and you accompany it.