Under the new situation, what are the perplexities and problems in doing a good job in village level

First of all, the members of the party group are unable to play a leading role, and in practice, many people are arbitrary and arbitrary, and cannot guide the masses well and let the villagers participate in rural governance, and the exemplary guidance is not in place.

The second is that many village cadres are relatively old, and they are not innovative enough in daily management and handling problems, and they are prone to rely on experience to solve relevant problems, which is not advisable. In addition, there is a shortage of village cadres who have a relatively short idea of the rule of law, and now the social structure of the villages has undergone great changes, and they cannot effectively use the knowledge of the law, but prefer to take some extreme measures.

Finally, the village cadres are not enough to control the economic ability and avoid risks, the village economy is mainly led by the village cadres, and the rural areas lack the village cadres who really understand the professional knowledge of economic organization and management and modern enterprise operation, and even some village cadres are still thinking in the era of planned economy.

At this stage, there is a large gap in the economic and social development of rural areas in China, and the difficult problems faced by different regions are not the same, but in general, there are the following five difficult problems in rural governance in China.

One is that the population of the village is "empty". With the continuous development of urbanization and economic society, China's population distribution has shown a trend of further agglomeration to economically developed regions and towns. With the migration of rural people to the cities in large numbers, the rural structure has undergone major changes, and the new "part-time work and half-farming" model represented by the "intergenerational division of labor" and "gender division of labor" has quickly become the main livelihood structure in rural areas (i.e., the livelihood model in which the young and strong labor force of rural households, mainly men, goes out to obtain income, while women, the elderly and children in the family work at home to obtain agricultural income).

Different from the previous model of leaving the land without leaving the hometown, under the new "part-time work and half-farming", the young and strong labor force has left the land and left the hometown, which has brought about the problem of rural hollowing. Second, the rural society is "scattered". Since the reform and opening up, the simplification of the functions of village-level organizations and the adjustment of production relations have reduced the interaction between peasant households and village-level organizations and between peasant households.

On the one hand, the comprehensive implementation of the household responsibility system and the continuous progress of agricultural science and technology have made the highly decentralized business model with individual households as the main body become the mainstream of agricultural production, and then gradually opened up the originally intimate production and life relationship in rural areas. On the other hand, due to the impact of the market economy, the weakening of the functions of grass-roots organizations, the reduction of social and cultural life in the villages, the acceleration of the flow of people, and the miniaturization of rural families, the villages in some places lack cohesion and centripetal force, and the leadership, leadership, and appeal of village-level organizations are insufficient, and they fall into the embarrassing situation of "no one listens to what they say and no one follows them". The above factors are superimposed on the "hollowing" of rural areas and the weak village collective economy, so that some villages have obvious characteristics of "scattered ideas, scattered resources, and scattered funds", and individual peasant households have no ability or idea to organize and manage the huge and disorderly resources within the village, and the good wish of "turning lucid waters and lush mountains into gold and silver mountains" often corresponds to the cruel reality of "good mountains, good waters, and good desolation".

Third, the work burden is "heavy". Since the beginning of the new century, the state's major policies have been adjusted to industry to feed agriculture and cities to support rural areas, and the state's investment in agriculture and rural areas has continued to increase. While the factor resources continue to sink into the countryside, the corresponding work tasks, standard requirements, supervision and inspection are also accompanied by the sinking of the countryside, making the operation mode of the village "two committees" more and more like a first-level administration, and the degree of "professionalism" of village cadres is increasing day by day.

In the face of a large number of tasks assigned by townships and towns, village cadres have in fact become the "best people" in the townships, and they rarely have time to "discuss the situation of the village" with the local people and carry out villager self-government. In particular, under the circumstance that the mountains and rivers are overwhelmed with assessments and inspections, the pressure on the village-level organizations is huge, the operation is disorderly, and they are tired of coping, and the village cadres have become "cousins" and "cousins", and their energy is focused on holding meeting reports to check in and meet the inspection, squeezing the time for providing high-quality services for the peasant masses and grasping rural governance.

1.Problems and dilemmas in rural governance: lack of governance talents, low literacy, lack of financial guarantee for rural grassroots social governance, and low enthusiasm of some people to participate in grassroots governance.

2.Rural governance countermeasures: strengthen the cultivation of grassroots talents, transform talent training into the main force of governance, increase capital investment, provide financial guarantee for grassroots governance, and fully mobilize the participation of social organizations and the masses.

Summary: Rural governance includes improving the institutional mechanism of village party organizations leading rural governance, strengthening the construction of safe villages, promoting the construction of rural areas under the rule of law, and supporting the participation of multiple subjects in rural governance.

Rural governance still faces many problems. First, rural autonomy is still imperfect, grassroots democracy is a mere formality, peasants lack the dominant position, and peasants have few opportunities and great difficulties in participating in the management and supervision of village affairs. Second, the power and legitimacy of grassroots political power and organizations, as well as the financial power and foundation of grassroots political power and organizations, have not been fundamentally solved, resulting in poor rural financial conditions, resulting in the reduction of the public welfare of rural governance, the enhancement of operation, predation, and coercion, the transformation of rural governance into rural management, the transformation of rural public services into the possession of rural resources, and the deterioration of rural order.

Third, the main way for the state to transfer resources is the direct distribution of subsidies and the "project system", and the top-down resource input is often out of touch with the bottom-up needs of farmers. Fourth, there is a problem of corruption among village cadres, and it is difficult for village cadres and villagers to form a cooperative relationship in rural governance, but more of a game of interests, and the conflict between cadres and the masses is on the rise. In the face of the new contradictions in rural society and the new challenges of rural governance, it is necessary to further deepen the reform of the rural governance system and mechanism, improve the rural governance system and promote the realization of good rural governance.

The main problems of rural governance are: first, the low level of autonomy, second, the traditional governance mode does not meet the development needs of the new era, third, the "hollowing" is serious, and the main body of governance is missing, etc., and the above three points are the main problems of rural governance.

To be honest, the main problem of rural self-separation is the lack of talent. Now talented and capable people are in the city and don't want to be in the countryside.

The development of the rural economy has been restricted, and the permanent population of rural areas has decreased.

How to do the work of villager representatives, further improve the village-level governance system, talk about experience and practices, problems and deficiencies and opinions.

As a villager representative, in order to better promote the improvement of the village-level governance system, it is necessary to do the following things: 1. Implement the village-level democratic management system, elect outstanding village cadres, and carry out various tasks according to the job responsibilities of the villagers' committee. At the same time, it is necessary to establish institutions such as villagers' councils, villagers' representative councils, and villagers' supervisory committees to promote the implementation of systems such as villagers' financial disclosure, village affairs disclosure, and decision-making disclosure, so as to ensure the democratization and transparency of decision-making.

Through these measures, villagers can better participate in the management of village affairs. 2. Actively carry out village-level cultural constructionThrough actively carrying out village-level cultural construction, we should strengthen the improvement of villagers' spiritual and cultural quality. A series of activities, such as theatrical performances, cultural lectures, calligraphy and painting competitions, etc., can be carried out to meet the spiritual and cultural needs of the villagers, and at the same time, it can also provide more public services for the villagers.

3. Promote the construction of village-level infrastructure, uphold the concept of "people-oriented", and continuously strengthen the construction of village-level infrastructure. We should build roads, water supply, power supply, communications and other infrastructure in the villages, improve the production and quality of life of the villagers, and let the villagers have a better living guarantee. 4. Strengthen the development of village-level enterprises and develop the village-level economy by actively introducing and cultivating small and micro enterprises.

At the same time, build a good rural tourism industry, attract tourists from the outside world, increase the income of villagers, and improve the vitality of the countryside. The above four points are what I think needs to be focused on in the work of villager representatives. At the same time, there are also some problems, such as the lack of enthusiasm of some villagers to actively participate in the affairs of the villagers, and the fact that some villagers' representatives are more utilitarian and have serious individualistic thinking, which affects the democratic governance of the village at the deficit level.

I think it is necessary to strengthen the training of villagers and increase the enthusiasm of villagers to participate in the affairs of villagers in the state. Strengthen supervision and evaluation of the work of villagers' representatives, strictly implement the principles of morality, discipline, and law, and ensure the fairness and pragmatism of democratic governance at the village level. At the same time, it is also necessary to further improve the village-level governance system, implement the legal system, and realize the continuous and in-depth development of village-level democratic governance.

Legal Analysis: Questions:

1. Weak organizational capacity.

2. The improvement of the human settlement environment is insufficient.

3. Feudal superstition and historical dregs are overflowing, constantly eroding the foundation of rural civilization construction.

4. Lack of the concept of the rule of law.

5. The awareness of mass participation in governance is not there.

Countermeasures: 1. It is necessary to give full play to the leading core role of the party organization.

2. It is necessary to improve the living environment in rural areas.

3. It is necessary to deepen the construction of rural civilization.

4. Pay attention to the participation of the masses in rural social governance.

Legal basis: Law of the People's Republic of China on the Promotion of Rural Revitalization

Article 2: This Law applies to the full implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, the development of activities such as promoting the revitalization of rural industries, talents, culture, ecology, and organizations, and promoting the integrated development of urban and rural areas.

"Villages" as used in this Law refers to regional complexes outside urban built-up areas that have natural, social, and economic characteristics and multiple functions such as production, life, ecology, and culture, including townships, towns, villages, and so forth.

Article 3: The promotion of rural revitalization shall, in accordance with the general requirements of thriving industries, livable ecology, civilized rural customs, effective governance, and affluent life, make overall plans to promote rural economic, political, cultural, social, and ecological civilization construction, and Party building, and give full play to the unique functions of villages in ensuring the supply of agricultural products and food security, protecting the ecological environment, and inheriting and developing the excellent traditional culture of the Chinese nation.

Article 5: The State consolidates and improves the two-tier management system based on household contract management and combining centralized and decentralized management, and develops and strengthens the rural collective ownership economy.

Article 6: The State establishes and completes institutional mechanisms and policy systems for the integrated development of urban and rural areas, promotes the orderly flow of urban and rural elements, equal exchange, and balanced allocation of public resources, persists in supplementing agriculture with industry and using cities to lead rural areas, and promotes the formation of a new type of urban-rural relationship between industry and agriculture, in which industry and agriculture promote each other, urban and rural areas complement each other, develop in a coordinated manner, and prosper together.