Guan Weidong is being accused, does anyone know the details?

Well, is it the student who sued him, I heard that he was not a human being.

Recently, Bosen and the Graduate Management Admission Committee (GMAC) of the United States have reached a settlement under the mediation of the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court on the case of "GMAT test question infringement". According to the presiding judge, this is the first case in which the plaintiff and the defendant reached a settlement in many intellectual property disputes between China and the United States without entering formal litigation proceedings since China joined the Berne Convention in 1992.

The GMAC is still unfamiliar to the general Chinese public, but when it comes to the GMAT exams it administers, it affects all applicants around the world who want to enter the world's top business schools for MBAs and other business master's programs. As of '09, the GMAT exam has been adopted as an entrance exam by 1,500 business schools and 1,800 business administration study programs around the world. In addition, the GMAT score also directly determines the amount of scholarship that the applicant will receive.

The origin of the intersection between GMAC and Bosson is the GMAT test.

Bosen focuses on GMAT, TOEFL, SAT, LSAT and other Chinese language test training, in 08 China has 11287 people to take the GMAT exam, according to the data provided by Bosen, in 08 more than 70 Bosen GMAT students got the top 20 business schools in the United States. The sharing of learning materials on the Internet by Bosen students caught the attention of the GMAC, which led to a lawsuit.

At the beginning of the infringement case, as the defendant, the senior management of Bosen happily admitted the tort liability at the first hearing of the court, but said that the infringement was even more out of helplessness, because at that time, even now in China, there was no official channel to directly obtain GMAT preparation materials. The sincerity of acknowledging mistakes became the direct reason for the settlement of this transnational intellectual property dispute.

The evidence of GMAC's lawsuit against Bosen for infringement is the "GWD" set of questions. Bosen executives said, "The so-called'Illegal' access to test questions is a last resort. "At present, Bosen is actively communicating with the GMAC, hoping to obtain the legal copyright authorization of the preparation materials from the GMAC, and gradually open up the official communication channels between Chinese training institutions and the GMAC.

I took his class in 2011, and it basically didn't have any real effect, but I was able to have a comprehensive understanding of the whole exam. After taking his class, the first exam was only 630, and then it took him two months to read the exam preparation materials on Chasedream word by word, and the second exam was 710

The curriculum of Guan Weidong Bozhi Education is relatively systematic, from the preliminary preview to face-to-face teaching, and then to the later preparation for the exam, a comprehensive course.

Personally, I think that Bozhi's teaching method is completely incomparable with other companies, and Mr. Guan focuses on ability and gives you the most advanced thinking method.

You can take a look at Bozhi's **, the introduction is very detailed.

The training course is just like that, the key is to rely on yourself.

I went to school a few years ago, and I feel that the main role is to be with test friends, to be able to force myself to study for a while, and to learn and play alone, hehe.

If self-control is strong enough, there is no need to go to a tutorial class, and logical thinking is not something that Mr. Guan can meet.

It's better to do more LSAC questions by yourself, do them on time, and do them several times.

Guan Weidong's Bozhi LSAT course is indeed very expensive, but this year I seem to have heard that the enrollment situation of their LSAT class is quite good, which shows that everyone is still going to Lao Guan, I think Lao Guan is authoritative, you can go to understand the content of Teacher Guan's class in detail.

It is recommended that you call Polydige** for personal consultation, after all, others do not know much about this information.

Why do you have to listen to her class, Bosen's Huang Daxian sedan chair, Wang Dada, Teacher Li An, and Teacher Fei Fei, aren't they all very good? Is Guan Weidong's closed cave so good? Don't just listen to fame, in the Internet age, there is nothing to brag about.

The strength of Bosen lies not in the face-to-face teaching, but in the pre-class preview plan and the Q&A and learning groups after the face-to-face class. It is recommended that you go to Bosen.

Tell you, Bosen can still blow!

Bosson is not bad now

There are also Yingji, Tang Jin, Wang Wenjing, Sun Juan, He Mengze, and Lu Rui.

Guan Weidong is definitely the originator in the field of thinking tests in North America, and was the first to put forward the internal evaluation criteria of thinking tests and the thinking skills that students need to have. Therefore, the question type of the exam is only an external form, and the internal thinking standards and abilities, as well as the ability to solve problems, are what really need to be improved and learned through the exam. At present, there are too few teachers who can teach GMAT and LSAT, and can thoroughly explain the intrinsic ability and external question types of these two tests, and he seems to be the only one in the industry.

What is there to fight The eyes of the masses are clear.

No matter what** a place with a teacher is a good place.

The GMAT of the old manager is the cow Bozhi's GMAT winter vacation class, brothers hurry up and report The number of places is limited.

On the top floor add two points:

His LSAT is definitely not GMAT bullish.

The only one who can teach the LSAT in China is Bosen.