Headphones UM1 EX90 EX500 Listen to pop Which one is better to buy

um1The low frequency is very weak.,A bit of an old iron style.,But there's no sound coloration.,It's good to listen to a female voice.,But it's not popular.,And the appearance and workmanship of Weston can't keep up with the sound quality.,So in the low-end moving iron,UM1It's my personal least favorite one.。

EX90,The low frequency is a bit excessive,Similar to the style of EX082,The overall sound control is not good enough,A little scattered,Especially the low frequency,Listen to the head for a long time,But Sony's plug has always been competent to be popular,I have a friend,Removed the membrane of the EX90 unit by itself,The sound becomes good。

EX500,It's a notch higher than EX90.,The analysis is better.,But it's far worse than EX700.,But I think EX500 is better.,Because after listening to EX700,I feel that all the tooth sound pure tone and ventilation sound are obvious.,It's a torture for listening to songs.。。。 So EX500 is a good choice.

In fact, what plug to buy still depends on the front end of the LZ, Sony's machine is suitable for its own plug, and the others should also be matched with the plug according to the characteristics of the front end.

I recommend it againsf3,The low-end moving iron can be said to be the best one,It is said that the sound of the low-end moving iron is cold,No feelings,But after buying sf3I think,SF3 completely subverts this point of view,Can't say it's warm,But I personally think it's just right,The performance of the three frequencies is also extraordinary,Especially satisfied with the low frequency,Deep diving,But it won't drag mud and water,The overall sound density is large,There is power。

Hope that helps

If there is an EX90 and it is fidelity, it will be EX90. However, there are a lot of fakes of EX90 now, so I don't recommend EX90

It is recommended that the landlord go to EX500, the degree of separation is relatively high, and the quality is still competitive at this price, but it takes a long time to cook, and it feels like the landlord can accept it if there are more teeth. It is said that Sony's plug (I haven't tried it myself, the landlord tried it) and Sony's machine is very compatible, and the building is mainly on the EX500 machine with Sony in hand.

I haven't heard of UM1 personally, so I can only provide some opinions. Specifically, it is comfortable to wear, the sound field is not large, the high and low frequencies are reduced, and it is more balanced (allow me to say so). I have read many people's opinions, but everyone has different opinions, and most of them reflect that um1 is bland and is a good stopper for fever.

I prefer EX500, but mine has been used badly, the production of headphones in order to save costs is a bit of a tragedy, EX90 compared to EX500, it is almost less bass, there is less bass, and there is a problem of sound insulation and sound leakage, compared with EX90 and EX500, naturally or EX500, EX500 is transparent, high frequency is good, low frequency has strength, the middle frequency is improvised, the sound field is small, UM1, it is more stuffy。。。 The high frequency is not good enough, that's it.,The overall quality is poor, the difference is still good.,It's just that if you listen to EX500 to listen to UM1, you may not be able to accept it.,UM1 is not bad in the case of no comparisonUM1 and EX500, you can choose to see the things on the sense of hearing, or listen to it yourself.,10 mouths, 10 kinds of sounds, but at the same price, I still think it's about the same.,There is a lack of Qing grinding points, and there are advantages。

I think Sennheiser's headphones are just fine.

I've heard it all, and I've been listening to it for a long time in 90 (I bought it when it first came out, '05 or '06).

Officially, the units used for the two plugs are all the same, so they should be the same according to the data, but EX500 is an upgraded version of EX90, with a more reasonable shape and lighter weight, and ** is not a grade in terms of just being listed, EX500 is more affordable.

But if I have to say it, I still think the EX90 is better (after all, after using it for a long time, the EX500 listens to it).

The characteristics of these two stoppers are balanced, not much, not much, unlike those high-end stoppers that are a bit extreme.

Right now I'm playing TF10 SE530 IE8 ESW9 and so on, and there's a custom UE11 that I can tell you if you want to hear it.

Definitely EX90 is good, no need to compare. The ex90 sound is shocking, absolutely cool. You can just look at the reviews on the Internet by the way.

The two are a grade in price, but the EX500 is a relatively new model! In terms of technology, the EX500 is more advanced!

EX500 listens to the human voice better, except for the classical handicap, other ** types can be competent. The ex90 is very average, and the sound is soft and powerless.

However, the evaluation of headphones is very subjective, and the differences between things in the same grade are very subtle, so it is recommended that you actually listen to it and choose the one you like.

The UM1 sound is crisp and clean, with almost stretch at both ends of the high and low frequencies.

K319 is a good stopper, and the quality is very good when wearing a sponge sleeve.

The EX500 is a nice thing, but the tooth sound can kill.

R04 tuning is reasonable, and other domestic gods should retreat.

Don't choose moving iron headphones below 600, very much. You can choose VSONIC R04 Collector's Edition, Zombie's PR200, Senhai's MX90VC, Dendon's C252, Bya's DTX100, and Goethe's IGI.

I recommend EX500, I've heard, omnivorous headphones, 600 at this price EX500 is more invincible, the bass is very good, as for the tooth sound problem, it can be much better after boiling, and it looks great.

That's the Iron Triangle ES7, ES7 high frequency is bright and transparent, the resolution is very high, the low frequency volume is just right, the dive is very good, the mid-frequency vocals are thinner, and the sound field is very large. Basic and A816 are more complementary. The licensed goods ** are 950, and the Hong Kong bank is less than 900.

If the sound field is good, then the headphones are 850 m1 more than 600 for ES7 water, and more than 600 for SR80.

Bose on Ear is not good to push 816 5MW thrust is really bad to push earbuds because 816 bass is a bit too much, choose a single unit moving iron complementary combination is goodUM1 E2C SE210?er6i, er6, sf3, etc.

Sony with Sony's headphones can give full play to Sony's sound characteristics. The EX500 EX300 EX90 is perfect for listening to rock and roll, and the sound effect of the 816 is absolutely shocking, which is a very good entry headphone.

Agree that the upstairs My 815 is also Audio-Technica's ES7

All have used the highest comprehensive quality ex90, on the whole.

However, in this case, the characteristics of the EX90 appear to be more bleak.

The SF3's low frequencies feel very good, and the parsing is okay.

The sound and wearing of UM1 are very comfortable and coincidental with sails.

SF3 is worth a hailstorm, and it's not very expensive.

EX90 is relatively good at this price, UM1 is average, UESF3 has not been used, so it is not good to evaluate.

It is recommended that the landlord listen to the sound by himself, and others can only be used as a reference

Sony EX500, this one is better-looking, and Gauss's so-called seckill EX90 is also better-looking, forget the model.

The landlord can take a look at the Audio-Technica's ckm70 and AKG K340 models!! The CMK70 has a strong metallic feel, and the K340 is available in champagne and licorice colors, and it is controlled by wire!

If 500 is a little too much, you can consider Sony EX500. There are also two models, black and white! It's not bad to go out on the street!!