How to train yourself to be a good attacker and debater?

To participate in the debate, the key is to have your own ideas, to have your own huge knowledge reserves, you can't wait for the other party to say a topic and say a point of view, your mind is blank at this time, at this time remembered, you should go to the Internet to check the information, then it is too late, you must accumulate a vast amount of information in ordinary times, understand all aspects of things, the wider your knowledge, the more topics you can talk about when you debate, You must remember that you can't lead the other party in your thinking, you have to have your own debate ideas, you blindly refute the other party, your thinking has already followed the other party, follow the other party's path, you will never run as fast as the other party.

Before the defense, you must think clearly about the questions raised by the other party and how you want to reply, as the saying goes, "don't fight unprepared battles", and the same is true for defense, I remember when I used to participate in the defense, I listed the questions that the other party felt was beneficial to them, and then simulated them in my mind, which also helped me to attack, but if you want to become a really good defender, you still need to go through the "actual combat" training.

If you want to become a good debater, first of all, you need to do some exercises regularly, and you must often go to the Internet to find some relevant knowledge and theories, and constantly enrich and improve yourself, so that you will have this skill. You can also go online and look at other people's debates and learn some experience.

I think that in order to become a good debater, you must first have a certain amount of talent. When the other party asks a question, the brain can make corresponding responses in time. And be articulate.

Be clear. The main thing is to be agile. I think that's the most important characteristic of being an attacker and debater.

If you want to become an excellent debater, you must first be articulate, have a broad range of knowledge, be calm and calm when encountering any problems, and be able to quickly come up with coping strategies and remarks in your mind, and you must be constant. Exposure to new things and understanding new social phenomena can better improve one's resilience.

Carefully writing a verbatim transcript of a speech is a prerequisite for success. Write the content according to the theme of the speech, and you can use the structure of pointing out the theme + telling the story + explaining the sublimation. At the beginning, you clarify your own theme, then share your own stories or those around you, and finally analyze the stories to draw the audience back to their own themes.

If you want to let yourself play freely in the debate, you must let yourself master a lot of knowledge, no matter what you debate, you can refute it, a good debater is very comprehensive in knowledge, or there is no way to comment with the other party, you can't go anyway, the other party is wrong.

I think you can look at what other people's arguments are like. In this way, you can give you your own accumulated experience, and see what kind of momentum and language we should use to attack our opponents when we face these arguments again, which is very conducive to our learning.

The way to become the best debater:

1. You need to have good self-quality and understand that debate is not the same as quarrelling; Grinding shed.

2. Have a cool head and be calm when the situation is unfavorable;

3. Be good at listening and find loopholes in the opponent's debate;

4. You need to be ruthless, and you don't allow your subordinates to show mercy in debate;

5. You should know that the topic of the debate is just a topic, and does not represent a personal outlook on life, so don't be confused.

Leverage your strength. There is a trick in martial arts, called"Leverage your strength. "It means that a person with deep internal strength can use the power of the opponent's attack to counterattack the opponent. This method can also be applied to debate.

For example, in About"It's easier said than done"There was such a round in the debate. Positive: That's right!

Those people knew the power of the law precisely because they were on the ground of execution and were on the verge of death. The dignity of the law can be described as such"Knowing the difficulty"Where, the other party distinguishes friends! (Warm applause) when the other party to"It's easy to know the law, but it's hard to obey the law"The example is easier said than done", the positive side immediately turned into a follow:

It's not easy to know the law"strengthens one's own point of view and gives the other party a powerful response. Reversing the passive situation, the reason why the positive side was able to use the example of the opposing side to deal with it was because he had a strong backing up from a series of theories that did not express themselves verbally and reinterpreted the words: in the debate"Know", not only"Know"of"Know"It should be based on human rationality"Know"；It is not difficult to abide by the law, and as a process of conduct, it is not difficult to kill people, but it is difficult to know how to maintain human rationality and restrain the vicious desire to kill in the heart.

In this way, the square is broad, and the high position is defined"Knowing the difficulty"with"Easy to do"Narrowly and lowly defined by the opposing party"Zhiyi"with"It's hard to do....The power of the attack effectively hits back at the opponent, so that the opponent builds in"Know"with"OK"The superficial framework of argument has collapsed.

The change of tone can guide the development of the debate topic and also reflect the debater's mastery of the debate. If you can be imposing, it is suitable for the second debate question and free debate session. At that time, don't argue with the other party, just throw out one question after another, soften your own shortcomings, strengthen the other party's shortcomings, and take advantage of his illness to kill him, so that the other party cannot refute it.

If you are gentle and soft-spoken, it is suitable to strengthen reasoning, based on facts, supported by examples, and always on the topic of debate.

Need to be calm, sharp thinking, not humble or arrogant, in general, you can send some rhetorical questions, let the other party talk more, you can secretly change the concept, secretly replace the concept so that others subconsciously feel that what you said before and after is the same thing. It can be "proved" from some special angles that his argument is in the service of his own point of view, and in terms of tone and manner, it is best to write a series of articles and drink them in one go, so that it is easy to suppress the other party in momentum. As soon as the audience applauds, they will be more or less stressed.

In about"Poverty is more important than ignorance"In the debate, there is such a statement on the positive side:"…If the opponent weighs the importance of the argument by urgency, then I will tell you that I am very hungry now, and I am in need of food to satisfy my hunger, but I still have to argue, because I realize that argument is more important than hunger. "As soon as the words fell, applause erupted.

At this time, the opposing side calmly argued:"Friend of the other side, I think that 'there is no food to eat' and 'there is no food to eat' are two different things..."The opponent's reply provoked even warmer applause. square"I don't eat if I have food"to argue that poverty is not enough to fear and the relative importance of curing ignorance, the opposing side immediately generalizes from their own point of view"There is no food to eat"The purpose of the two is clearly compared with the essential difference between the two, and effectively stifles the tendency of the other party to secretly change concepts.

Organized, clear looking, easy to use. With the collection of the previous information, first of all, a simple list of items to prove several points of view of your own debate (generally three best), comparison of positive and negative sides, your own shortcomings (there is no absolute right and wrong in the debate competition), the advantages of the other party, that is, the views that the other party can demonstrate, simple conjectures, convenient for group discussion to come up with coping strategies, and the opponent's argument can be attacked. Second, try to find a quote or example at the end of each column.

Although you must never judge people by their appearance, a reasonable dress will not only make you more confident, but also let the audience and judges see that you are serious. For official competitions, regular suits are generally rented, and the momentum is added instantly, and if there are no rental conditions, try to choose clothes with black, white, gray and dark colors and simple without too many hanging decorations.

Laziness is an extremely expensive luxury. Before the debate competition, a large number of materials related to the debate topic, poems, famous sayings, aphorisms, etc. are collected. It is not only necessary to do a good job of the information that should be mastered by the opponent's debate, but also to fully understand the pros and cons of the opponent's debate.

Only by overcoming laziness and understanding the topic of debate in its entirety can we have something to say in the debate.

According to the debate competitions I have participated in recently, for the four debaters they must have the qualities of being calm and calm, united and cooperative, complementing each other, full of confidence, bold and careful, and for the first debate, they must have the quality of summarizing and summarizing, the second and third debates must have the qualities of being vigilant, careful, and humorous, and the fourth debate must have momentum and domineering.

A confident person can exude infinite charm. The ultimate goal of a debate is to convince the other person to admit your point of view. A strong mentality can be used as a support to play better.

For those who are not confident, you can practice more tongue twisters, recipes, etc., to make the speed of speech faster and increase your confidence, and you can adjust the speed of speech in debates.

A good debater who knows how to control his gestures and language. In the debate competition, it can be funny, you can talk endlessly, and the most taboo is to point at people with a single finger or a pen or paper, slap the table with your palm, dirty work and other impolite behaviors, which are very deductible.

In his position, seek his government. In the general debate competition, there will be.

1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th debaters, four debaters. Different positions have corresponding responsibilities, first of all, you must be clear about the basic responsibilities that each debater should have.