How can monkeys be fairly compared to humans?

Don't try to treat the monkey as an evolutionary low-level person, treat him as another species to study it, so that it is fairest, always with a comparative attitude of superiority and inferiority, it will not be fair in any way.

There is no fairness to men, only people will compare these, there are more than 560 species of primates, each with its own evolutionary history and habits. Every life on Earth is unique.

Human beings obtain satisfaction in life through their hard work and wisdom. The monkeys still live in the forest and still maintain the original group life of the monkeys without any changes.

Monkeys also have very smart minds, humans also have very smart minds, monkeys have limbs similar to humans, so the comparison is fair, monkeys also use their hands to hold things the same as humans.

Monkeys and humans are actually close relatives. But after all, the human being, who is the master of the earth, is still above the monkey. Therefore, it is fairer to compare monkeys and humans only by going back to the same period.

Biological and physiological differences: Although both monkeys and humans belong to the primate order, there are many biological and physiological differences. For example, monkeys differ from humans in terms of body structure, hand dexterity, intelligence, and social behavior.

These differences affect monkeys' performance and efficiency at work, making it difficult for them to complete complex tasks as efficiently as humans. For example, precise steps such as manipulation, assembly, and inspection are required on an assembly line, which may be beyond the capabilities of monkeys.

Limitations in language and cognitive abilities: In addition to biological and physiological differences, monkeys have very limited language and cognitive abilities compared to humans. Monkeys are unable to engage in complex communication and thinking activities like humans, which makes it difficult for them to understand complex workflows and instructions.

For example, there are steps such as coordination, communication, and feedback with other workers or machines, which may require advanced language and cognitive skills.

The Law and Ethics Problem: Even if monkeys are capable of assembly line work, large-scale training of monkeys as assembly line workers may cause legal and ethical controversy. Because it can involve issues such as exploitation, abuse, deprivation of liberty of monkeys, which can violate the principles of animal rights and welfare.

There are essential differences between humans and animals, including cognitive abilities, ways of thinking, and behavioral performance. While animals such as monkeys have some intelligence and learning ability, it is not realistic and challenging to train them on a large scale in a complex work environment and make them into assembly-line workers-like roles compared to humans. First of all, monkeys have relatively limited intelligence and learning abilities.

Although monkeys can exhibit high levels of intelligence on certain tasks, their cognitive edge and learning ability are still limited. Complex assembly line work often involves multiple skills and complex decision-making processes, requiring a high degree of flexibility and adaptability, which is difficult for monkeys to do. Second, monkeys have challenges in behavioral control and coordination.

Assembly line work usually requires workers to have fine hand-eye coordination and accurate movement control. Although the monkeys have more dexterous hand manipulation ability, training them into skilled assembly line workers requires long-term training and fine guidance, and the behavior control of monkeys is difficult to reach the level of humans. In addition, ethical and moral considerations should not be overlooked.

Large-scale training of monkeys to become assembly line workers can raise animal welfare and ethical concerns. Monkeys are creatures with emotional and social needs, and placing them in a mechanized work environment can adversely affect their welfare and health. On top of that, humans have more advanced technology and creativity.

We are able to improve productivity and the quality of work through the development and innovation of science and technology, rather than relying solely on animal labor. Rather than training monkeys to become assembly line workers on a large scale, we should pay more attention to cultivating human skills and abilities, improving human creativity and thinking ability, and promoting scientific and technological progress and social development. To sum up, although monkeys have a certain amount of good intelligence and learning ability, in reality, it is not realistic to train monkeys to become large-scale assembly line workers.

We should pay more attention to human capacity building and scientific and technological innovation to meet the work needs and challenges of modern society. At the same time, we should also protect and respect the rights and welfare of animals, and avoid unnecessary exploitation and harm to them.

Ability to distinguish colors; Binocular eyes are similar to humans, long in front of the head, with a "double vision" function, can accurately judge the distance; The upper and lower jaws are short, the brain cavities are large, the brain is well developed, and the intelligence is high. The limbs are long and have a clear division of labor, the joints are flexible and can be used freely, the thumb can be held with the other four fingers, and the hands have a certain operating function.

Monkey is a general term for mammalian primates, omnivorous, fruit-based, and does not let go of readily available meat, and is a member of three species of ape primates.

Humans and monkeys are close relatives and share genetic similarities between the two. Therefore, one cannot help but wonder: since the monkeys have a certain intelligence and flexibility, why not train them on a large scale to become assembly line workers?

This issue involves many aspects such as ethics, morality, science and society. This article will look at this issue from different angles. Anterior focal source.

1. Ethical and moral aspects.

Ethics and morality are the cornerstones of human society, and they determine our code of conduct and values. Despite their similarities to humans, monkeys are still animals that do not have the same self-awareness and moral judgment as we do. Training monkeys to be assembly line workers involves a violation of their freedom and dignity.

We should not see animals as tools, but respect their nature and right to live.

Second, the scientific level.

Although monkeys have some intelligence and flexibility, there is still a gap compared to humans. Monkeys have different brain structures and functions than humans, and their ability to adapt is also different. When training monkeys to become assembly line workers, we need to take into account their physical and mental health.

The monkeys' body structure and abilities limit their performance on specific tasks. At the same time, training monkeys takes a lot of time and resources, and the results are not necessarily at the level of human workers.

Third, the social dimension.

Introducing a large number of monkeys trained as assembly line workers in society can cause a series of problems. First of all, it will lead to the unemployment of a large number of human workers, arguing that it will bring serious economic and social problems to society. Secondly, as an animal, the monkey is unable to adapt to the complex social environment and workplace culture.

Compared to humans, monkeys have limited communication and cooperation skills, making it difficult for them to handle complex work tasks. Above all, there is an insurmountable difference between humans and monkeys, and humans remain irreplaceable, both in their ability to work and in their social interactions.

In summary, despite the similarities between monkeys and humans, the large-scale training of monkeys as assembly line workers is problematic on both ethical, scientific, and social levels. We should respect the rights and dignity of animals, while developing and upgrading our own skills and abilities to adapt to the changing needs of society.

First, the suborder is different:

1. Man: Subclass of True Beasts.

The subclass euhatrian is the most complex group of vertebrates with the most complex body structure, function and behavior (the brain structure has corpus callosum).

2. Monkeys: apes suborder.

Anthropoid: A suborder of primates. That is, the higher primates, including various monkeys, apes and humans, have developed intelligence, fingertips with nails, are mostly active during the day, and their faces are more or less human-like.

<> Second, the subfamilies are different:

1. People: Humans.

Homogeneidae, refers to apes. There are some other species of Homo members in prehistory, which can generally be divided into two subfamilies, namely the early Australopithecus subfamily and the later Homo subfamily.

2. Monkeys: Monkey subfamily.

The forelimbs are slightly longer than the hind limbs, the tail is short, and the face is bare. It includes about 50 species in 8 genera. They are short-limbed monkeys, pygmy long-tailed monkeys, red monkeys, green monkeys, long-tailed monkeys, macaques, white-faced monkeys, baboons, lion-tailed monkeys, white-browed monkeys, and mandrills.

3. Kinds of differences:

1. Human: Homo sapiens is the only human race in existence in the world. Biologically, the human race in the world is only one species, belonging to the class of mammals-primates-hominida-e-homo sapiens.

2. Monkey: Monkey is a general term. There are many animals in the primate family that we call monkeys.

Primates are one order of mammals, the highest group of the animal kingdom, with a well-developed brain; orbits facing anteriorly, orbital spacing narrow; The toes (fingers) of the hands and feet are separated, and the thumbs are flexible, and most of them can be held opposite to the other toes (fingers). He is also one of the 12 Chinese zodiac signs.

While monkeys have excellent intelligence and athletic abilities in some ways, there are several reasons why they are still not suitable for mass training as assembly line workers:

First of all, although monkeys have more developed intelligence than some other animals, they still have a large gap compared to human intelligence. For example, monkeys are far inferior to humans in both thinking and language. This means that monkeys can't understand complex production processes and workflows like humans, and they can't work as a team and communicate as humans.

Secondly, the monkey's body structure and abilities are also not suitable for working as an assembly line worker. Although the monkeys have excellent dexterity and agility in their hands and feet, they are not large enough or strong enough to do most of the repetitive movements and heavy loads that are required of the repetitive movements. In addition, the size and ability of monkeys cannot be adapted to the requirements for the physical health and safety of workers in modern industrial production.

Finally, the monkey is a highly intelligent and affectionate early animal. Large-scale training and use of them as assembly line workers not only causes physical and psychological harm to them, but also raises questions about animal protection and ethics.

In summary, while the monkeys have some excellent intellectual and athletic abilities, they are still not suitable for training and use as large-scale assembly line workers. In contrast, humans have a clear advantage in terms of intellectual and physical abilities and play an important role in modern industrial production.

1. Differences in the nature of species.

Monkeys are a population of the kingdom Primates; Humans are humans, and humans are of the human race.

2. Different living habits.

The vast majority of primates live in different forms of arboreal or semi-arboreal life; Human beings can use language, have a variety of complex mutualistic social organizations, and like to develop complex technologies.

3. The characteristics are different.

Monkeys have tails and long hairs on their bodies; Humans do not have tails and do not have long hairs on them.

Five monkeys were put in a cage with a bunch of bananas on top of it, and the experimenters installed an automatic device that would spray water into the cage if a monkey was detected to get a banana, and the five monkeys would immediately get wet. First of all, one monkey wanted to get a banana, and immediately the water sprayed out, and every monkey got wet, and every monkey tried it and found that it was the same, so the monkeys came to a consensus: don't go to get the banana, because the water will squirt out.

Later, the experimenter replaced one of the monkeys and replaced them with a new monkey (called a monkey), and put them in a cage, and the A monkey saw the banana and immediately wanted to get it, but was beaten by the other four old monkeys, because the other four monkeys thought that the new monkey would cause them to be drenched in water, so they stopped the new monkey from getting the banana, and the new monkey tried several times, but was beaten all over the head, but still did not get the banana, and of course the five monkeys were not sprayed by the water. Later, the experimenter replaced an old monkey with a new monkey (called Monkey B), and put it in a cage, and this Monkey B saw the banana, of course, he was going to get it immediately, but the result was also beaten by the other four monkeys, and the Monkey A hit particularly hard, (This is called the old bird bullying the rookie, hehe!) The B monkey tried several times and was always beaten badly, so he had to give up.

Later, one by one, all the old monkeys were replaced by new monkeys, and everyone didn't dare to touch the banana, but they didn't know why, they only knew that if they moved the banana, they would be beaten by Haibian After reading it, I thought, how can human beings not be affected by nature's play, continuous natural disasters, let us talk about its color change. Retribution.

Remember to adopt it.

Gecko is a vertebrate reptile that can only survive by catching small insects such as mosquitoes and flies, which shows that the IQ is relatively low. However, when it was in danger, it preferred to cut off its tail and give it to the predators who pursued it, but he himself took the opportunity to escape, and I heard that many other animals have such skills. Monkeys are primates and have a much higher IQ than geckos, etc.

Generally not easy to catch. However, in some places in the south, this method is often used to catch monkeys: monkeys love to eat apples, so the monkey catcher will cut a hole in a large southern paw that is the same size as an apple, take out the inside of the claw, and then stuff the apple into it, and put the southern paw in the place where the monkeys often haunt, but people hide in a hidden place and secretly watch.

The monkey found that there was an apple in the south paw, so he reached into the paw to dig it out, and then the monkey catcher could come out, and the monkey knew that the man was here to catch it, but he had already caught the apple, but he refused to let go, and always wanted to take out the apple and run again, and the final result was that he was caught. However, this method did not work the second time. Compared to geckos, monkeys must have a much higher IQ, but geckos can escape, but monkeys fall into human hands.

A few days ago, chatting with my colleagues, I learned that a director of the people's congress of a certain city had been arrested by the public security department again. The so-called "again" word is because he was arrested once five years ago, and later he was dismissed due to lack of evidence. But there are also legends that the director of the National People's Congress is very personable.

This time, I heard that the evidence is conclusive, and it is a new problem in recent years. Whether there will be another lucky star on the head to shine this time is not within this topic. And as far as these three things are concerned, it is an indisputable fact that monkeys are greater than geckos and humans are greater than monkeys in terms of IQ.

But the gecko is not caught, the monkey is caught, and the man is caught for the second time, I'm afraid everyone understands the reason, right? It doesn't matter how high the IQ is! Is that right?