Buy a camera connoisseur to help

Canon A590 can meet your shooting requirements, as well as electronic viewfinder and electronic grid, so that if you are not convenient to use the display screen, you can use the electronic viewfinder, **It is not expensive about 1300 yuan shopping mall**.

The Sony has a sleeker profile, but the lenses are not as good as those of the Panasonic and Nikon. If you have a small card machine, you can buy a more than 7 million phase elements. If the price point of Panasonic and Nikon is too high, Canon and Samsung can too. However, Samsung's anti-repair rate is relatively high.

Canon bar. There are a lot of them, so take a closer look.

1.Fashion can be cheap - Sony S650

As an entry-level machine, Sony did not pick the door on the CCD, and the S650 uses a 7.2 million pixel product, which belongs to the leading level in the same class. The Carl Zeiss lettering does not appear on the 3x optical zoom lens, which is believed to be due to cost control considerations. The LCD on the back of the fuselage is wrapped in black edges, which looks like a large area, but it is actually only inches, but we should not have too high requirements for an entry-level machine.

Sony S650

The number of effective pixels is 7.1 million.

Optical zoom multiplier times.

Sensor size 1

Focal length (equivalent to a 35mm camera) 35-105mm, macro focus range: 5-35cm

Maximum aperture range -

Shutter speed Mechatronic shutter seconds.

Sensitivity range Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1000 LCD screen size inches.

Memory card type Memory Stick Duo, Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro Duo (High Speed).

Image size --

Power supply: 2 x 5 AA batteries.

Dimensions 91 61 27mm

Weight 178g

Sony S650 [Reference**] 1050 yuan.

2.Canon A470: The biggest brand of cheap cameras.

Basic hardware configuration: 7 million pixels, double optical zoom Canon lens, inch 10,000 pixel LCD

The landlord can consider the Samsung Blues i8, I use this now, it is very durable, the camera has not had any quality problems for two years, the imaging is very clear, the color reproduction is also very real, and there is ultra-macro, and various scene modes are also very useful. The operation is relatively easy to use, the anti-shake effect is good, the battery life is also very good, and it is a cost-effective model!

Panasonic LX5, the picture quality is average, the handling is good, and it is the most portable.

Canon G12, the picture quality is average, the maneuverability is better, the flipping screen is very convenient, and it is not very portable.

Panasonic GF2, good image quality, touch focus is interesting, maneuverability is good, body size is average.

Sony nex5c, the picture quality is very good, the maneuverability is average, the flip screen is also very good, and it is more portable.

In terms of image quality, Sony NEX5 is the first two spikes, and the advantages over Panasonic GF2 are also obvious.

The sensor area is the most important factor in determining the image quality, the sensor area of the NEX5 is 365 square millimeters, the GF2 is 225 square millimeters, the LX5 is about 47 square millimeters, and the G12 is about 43 square millimeters.

There is a big gap in image quality,NEX5The image quality can be said to be the same level as any fuselage** SLR below 15,000。 And being able to change the lens can improve the image quality.

No matter how good the card machine (such as G12, LX5) is still a card machine.

Even if it is the most portable Panasonic LX5, it can't be easily put in your pocket and you have to carry a bag, in that way, the portable advantages of LX5 are really not much, not to mention that the NEX5 will not be very large.

Now there is really not much reason to spend more than 3,000 yuan on the kind of "high-end card machine" that is not very portable.

100% Sony NEX-5C this is good, it is a single motor, SLR sensor, G12 is only a little larger than the sensor of the general card machine, but it is much worse than the single electric ratio, smaller than the sensor of Panasonic LX5, G12 is not a camera, it is a press! It's really not worth buying a card machine at a price of nearly 4000, since you have taken Sony as a candidate, then buy Sony.

Sony NEX-5C

The quality of the SLR, the appearance of the card.

Absolute value.

Relatively speaking, the Sony NEX-5C is better, because the effective pixel is higher, the aperture is the maximum, and the ISO is also very large.

Canon is better, Canon specializes in making cameras, SLR and digital DC sales in China are far ahead of other brands, high configuration, good quality, **acceptable. Look at Canon's latest ixus and powershot Boxiu series The configuration is good, ** is only in the early 1000s, it's really cost-effective The landlord went to the official website to take a look