What lens is good for Nikon D7000

vr 70-300mm f/ if-ed。Economical and biased towards the telephoto end. The 35 is one of Nikon's few fairly generous entry-level lenses and offers great value for money; The 70-300mmVR lens is known as the "poor man's bull head", nicknamed "little donkey cannon", and more users like to call it XLP (little wife).

The VR II's vibration absorption function can meet the needs of handheld shooting for most of the time, and the image quality of the 70-200mm interfocal length is not inferior to that of the medium telephoto zoom head in any of Nikon's gold-ring lenses. The only drawback is that the aperture is a little smaller, otherwise there would be no reason for the existence of the Nikon small steel cannon.

or 50 dx 12-24 F 4g if-ed. It focuses on the wide-angle end configuration, and the cost is also higher. The 50 is also one of Nikon's most generous entry-level lenses, and it is great for indoor close-ups and outdoor bust portraits on APS-C format cameras. The 12-24 F4G lens is Nikon's first DX lens, and it is the absolute choice on DX, the biggest advantage is the super anamorphic control ability, the sharpness of the imaging center and the edge is relatively average, maybe only the 14-24mm Bull wide angle can be comparable to her, the color reproduction ability is the same as the 17-55mm DX mirror, and the disadvantage is that it can only be used on APS-C format cameras.

It basically covers the commonly used focal lengths, and the cost is high. The AF-S 70-200mm F 4G ED VR lens is Nikon's latest lens, and it is said that the image quality is not inferior to that of the 70-200 except for the smaller aperture.

4.The 16-85 is not recommended and the biggest flaw with this lens is the two-section barrel design, which is less durable. The 17-55 has almost no shortcomings except for its high level and can only be used with APS-C format cameras, making it the best APS-C format lens and the worst cost-effective lens.

Can it solve your problem?

Fixed Focus, Zoom, Wide Angle, Macro, etc. Depending on your needs, the best lens is the sleeve.

Every shot is good, depending on your use and budget.

It mainly depends on your photography habits, which focal length is commonly used, then focus on that focal length.

At your price point, 50 in the fixed angle head is worth considering. A wide aperture is used for people, and a small aperture is used for landscapes. If you buy 50, you can also consider buying a 28 with the rest of the money, which is dedicated to taking pictures.

The fixed focus head is a professional head, and it will not be outdated after buying, and it is worth saving.

When I first entered the Nikon field, due to financial reasons, the lenses were bought one by one: 50, 28, 85, etc., and it took nearly ten years to buy the prime head.

If you have just entered the world of SLR and are not very clear about your focal length habits, it is recommended that you buy an 18-200, shoot for a year or two, and then analyze the ** you shoot, see the proportion of each focal length, and then buy a quasi-professional or even professional lens with that focal length, which can save a large number of lens purchase costs in the future.

The wide-angle end is perfect for shooting scenes, while the telephoto segment is perfect for portraits.

For example, the usage rate of the three lenses that I currently use is for your reference:

14-24, the usage rate is less than 5%;

24-70, the usage rate is more than 80%;

70-200, the usage rate is about 15%.