What is the performance of the following two CPUs?

Updated on number 2024-04-08
20 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Of course, athlon is a lot!

    L1 and L2 should be larger, and the instruction set should be larger.

    Practical words athlon

    Affordable words flash dragon.

    Let's not talk about the problem of matching the motherboard here, because these 2 are also products that are facing elimination.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The difference is that one is 64-bit and the other is 32-bit, and the 64-bit CPU can run a 64-bit operating system.

    If you choose between these two, of course, it's athlon64

    The main K8-T800 series is OK.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The former, of course! Sempemp is the AM bottom end series, which is equivalent to the previous Intel's Celeron It is recommended to use the previous model!

    As for the organizers, there are no special requirements or choose ATI690G, the product is mature, **cheap!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Of course it's a 64, SP doesn't have to

    The difference is big, A is equivalent to Intel's P4, and SP is equivalent to CD

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    AMD Athlon64 3000+ AM2 (Box) Good.

    It supports 64-bit computing technology, and the L2 cache is also much higher than the AMD Sempron 3000+ AM2 (box).

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Needless to say. AMD Athlon64 3000+ AM2 (Case).

    This is good, I use this one!

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    In terms of parameters, it should be Intel's quad-core, 4M cache, and it is a 45nm process;

    AMD's is a 65nm process, dual-core, and shares 1M L2 cache;

    Looking at the ranking, Q8400 is one place below the Yilong 940 (quad-core), which means that this Q8400 is much stronger than the Athlon5400;

    If you change Intel's CPU motherboard, you must change it, and you don't need to change the others, and if the power supply is enough, you don't need to change it; However, the CPU and motherboard have been replaced, which is equivalent to a big blood change, and it will cost a lot of silver, hehe.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    AMD Athlon64 x2 5400+ Frequency AM2 Platform Dual-core processor, L2 cache 1m Production process 65nm External frequency 200 market price 280 pieces.

    Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ Pseudo Quad-Core Processor Frequency LGA775 Platform L2 Cache 4m Production Process 45nm External Frequency 333 Market Price 680

    Comprehensively, it can be seen that both the core, the L2 cache and the process are Intel Q8400 strong. Although AMD's clock speed is slightly higher, its operating efficiency cannot be compared with that of the Q8400. ** There are obvious gaps.

    Compared to the Intel Q8400, it is generally the AMD Pterodactyl series.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    AMD is always chasing others behind, in addition to the best advantage, it is an indisputable fact that it is technically behind Intel.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The Q8400 outperforms 64x2 5400+ by more than two times.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Apparently Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ This is the ultra-high-end existence of a few years ago.

    AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+, this is the same product as the Q8400, but it is a representative of the low-to-mid-range.

    The 2 are completely incomparable, Q8400 kills 5400+ in seconds.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    I can tell you for sure that Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ can kill AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ in seconds. Don't say a few years ago, just take it now, it's a high-end CPU!

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    In terms of CPU performance alone, this i5-4570 is four-core and four-threaded, while E3-1230 V3 is four-core and eight-threaded, with similar main speeds and the same turbo frequency function.

    The CPU performance of the E3-1230 V3 is 30 - 35% higher than that of the i5, which is basically the level of the i7-4770 that cannot be overclocked, which is more suitable for professional design and games.

    However, the E3-1230 V3 boxed ** is very expensive about 1999 yuan, and the i5-4570 boxed ** is about 1350 yuan, this price difference is too powerful, and the performance advantage of E3-1230 V3 is not enough to make up for its price difference.

    So if you buy E3-1230 V3, you usually go to the computer city to buy a loose CPU,**Generally around 1399 yuan,And then just match a better radiator。 Pretty good value for money.

    However, it should be noted that the E3-1230 V3 cannot use SSD+HDD to form a hybrid hard drive.

    The i5 i7 works with the H87 Z87 motherboard, which allows you to use a hybrid hard drive, which means that a portion of the capacity of the SSD is used as a buffer area for the HDD, which is a great benefit for improving the overall performance.

    Therefore, for higher-budget hosts, there is usually an additional SSD solid state drive, which can be turned on for more than ten seconds. If you have an SSD, if you can't use hybrid hard drive technology, it's a bit of a loss.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Model score.

    Intel Core i5-4570 @ 7069Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 @ 9617 For the configuration to bring a discrete graphics card, I think E3 definitely wins.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    QQ Speed, DNF, CF, LOL - HD4600 can play with medium and high special effects!!

    Recommendation i5 4570-

    e3 1230 v3 i5 4570 300 or so Price difference At present, e3 1230 v3 is not cost-effective !!

    CPU performance mainstream common application i5 4570 is sufficient, there is no need to spend more than 300 with e3 1230 v3

    Many people think that e3 1230v3 is very cost-effective, and they ignore that they should buy based on their own needs!!

    No matter what, the hard disk will also cost 1TB of 5 0 60 price difference, the capacity will be doubled, and the cache will be quadrupled! It's a must!!

    Memory ADATA is suitable, although now ADATA also has a lot of fakes, it is still more reassuring than Kingston !!

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    I personally recommend i5 4570, the reason is that e3 1230v3 can only be bought from **, i5 4570 has too many channels; The second is that the advantage of E3 1230V3 is hyper-threading,This function is almost useless for games and daily operations,If you don't often want to transcode,It is recommended to buy i5 4570 (the game performance of these two CPUs has been tested,Some even i5 is still high,If you have to wait a few years for the program to optimize the 8 cores,Choose 8 cores)

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    E3 Completes 4570. In particular, multi-threaded task processing. Drawing Rendering of the first category.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    e6600>g620>g530。The performance ratio is approximately 5:3:2.

    Additional answer: I still don't think g620>e6600. The reason is that although E6600 is a 775 architecture, in fact, E6600 almost exerts the peak performance of the 775 architecture, if you use professional performance testing software, you will be able to find that its competency completely exceeds G620 and G530.

    It is approximately equivalent to the original 775 architecture of the Quad Q8300. Although the G620 and G530 use a new architecture and instruction set, it is a pity that it is too injured and cannot be overclocked in any form. Especially when it comes to running games, you'll find that the E6600 is much smoother than the G620.

    There is not much difference between L2 and L3 caches, mainly because the E6600 technology is quite mature, the operation is very stable, and the main frequency is high, and the speed will be significantly improved.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    g620 g530 e6600

    Electronic products must choose a new architecture,My cool E6300 was bought for 1200 yuan and now I can't even fight X2 240,And 240 and G530 are not high or low。

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    G620 G530 E6600 and G620 G530 are new cores with 1155 pins and E6600 are 775 pins and i5 i7 are all 1155 pins Now the new technologies are all 1155 E6600 is considered the old core Generally not used E6600 can be said to be the best in 775. However, it is also positioned that there is no room for CPU upgrades on the motherboard. G620 G530 and then 1155 needles are counted as the low end.

    But leaves room for future upgrades. No matter how economical it is, it can be upgraded to i5 i7 but not e6600. If you want to play games, I still recommend using the AMD series.

    The instantaneous speed is fast, but it is not as stable as intle.

Related questions
7 answers2024-04-08

720!Is there a difference? 425 is cost-effective! 720 is expensive! But playing the game is definitely 720! Tell you about it! Now 3 cores are not as good as 2 cores to play games! Change it to 550! Definitely stronger than 720

5 answers2024-04-08

You're a laptop graphics card, and it's not the same as a desktop one, but you can probably compare it to a desktop graphics card, and you're the lowest level 4 in the HD6000 series. >>>More

6 answers2024-04-08

First of all, I am a post-80s generation, whether it looks good or not, it has to be divided into crowds, young people, and the aesthetics of the elderly are different, and my personal opinion is that the coffee table with solid wood round legs is good-looking. Obviously, this TV and coffee table are painted, and the edges and corners everywhere are also very well processed and in place. The light-colored color, which looks bright and comfortable, is versatile in all kinds of rooms, and is the favorite color of young people born in the 80s. >>>More

8 answers2024-04-08

The main difference is in the L2 cache: 94 for 6mb 86 for 3mb, if not for large-scale calculations, 86 is enough, and 7,003 is not expensive, you can ask me.

16 answers2024-04-08

I just bought a Logitech X230,The sound quality is really good,Especially low frequency,If the landlord likes low frequency,Logitech X230The low frequency can definitely meet your requirements,Even if the bass gain is adjusted to the minimum,You can still feel its abundant power,It doesn't feel very loose,It's more elastic,Collect faster。 The medium and high frequencies are slightly insufficient, but they can still meet the needs of ordinary users, not to mention the effect of watching movies. In general, Logitech X230 is still relatively good, and it is an all-round speaker. >>>More