Do you support the complete abolition of off campus training classes and interest classes to reduce

This proposal actually confuses the logical relationship, you must know that the burden of parents and children is so heavy, not because there are too many extracurricular training classes, but because the pressure of competition is too great now, parents have to choose extracurricular training classes and interest classes in order not to let their children lose at the starting line. There are two sides to the existence of everything, and it is wise to use the good side and minimize the bad side.

In recent years, a variety of training courses emerge in endlessly, from kindergarten to university, no matter what age, as long as you want to enroll in classes, you can have training that suits you, students in addition to learning the knowledge in the books, after school and holidays also have to participate in training courses, to participate in training courses has basically become a compulsory course for students now. Even though the Ministry of Education has ordered a rectification of the phenomenon of after-school classes, it has not really solved the problem. In our country, key middle schools are scarce resources, and in order to be admitted to key middle schools, parents have to enroll their children in various training classes in order to meet the requirements of being one step ahead.

Influenced by cultural traditions, Chinese parents attach great importance to their children's education, and most of them have extremely high expectations, so the burden is bound to be heavy.

Personally, I think that there is a market demand for primary school training courses such as tutoring classes such as English and mathematics. Some children can't keep up with the curriculum, and their parents don't have time to tutor, so they can only add extra time to study in tutoring institutions, so if the tutoring institutions are canceled, it is difficult for parents of this group of children to agree.

Now the off-campus training institutions do need to be rectified, but it does not mean that they should be abolished. What needs to be rectified is the atmosphere of unhealthy competition between industries and the fraudulent behavior of charging sky-high fees, after all, there will be a market when there is demand. In the case of China's educational background and test-taking system unchanged for a long time, off-campus training institutions are inevitable, after all, no parent wants their children to lose at the starting line.

Providence! Providence! Providence! Strongly support!!

Confucius has been running a school for thousands of years, and I have never heard of any bad impact on the society, and now it is all charged, don't go if you don't want to go, and it is not all parents who shout to cancel every day, but those who have passive interests!

If you don't support it, you blindly pursue happy learning, so why do you need exams and diplomas for work?

The examination system has not changed, cancel the off-campus training class, they will change the way to continue, because the school has reduced the burden, smart parents will find tutors to tutor, so the tutoring class is not banned, some people don't need it, but most parents need it, they don't want their children to move bricks after the college entrance examination, because people's fate is in the college entrance examination that one chance.

People who do not have the money and the ability to provide for their children to attend training courses should cancel the training institutions.

I can take my children to take a good look at this great river and mountain, not to ask how good the child's knowledge is, but to ask the child to have a Chinese heart. Don't learn from those unvirtuous people!!

I don't support it, it's a pity to think back to when we were children who didn't have the conditions and no place to study.

If it is canceled, middle and poor students will not be able to learn well, because there is no place to make up for the knowledge that they can't keep up with in school, and the teacher will not take care of it. I do not support the cancellation of off-campus training.

Support the cancellation, return the happiness to the child, the child should have a happy childhood,

I support that the current out-of-school training has made children and parents too tired, and the economic and ideological pressure is very great, and it is indeed necessary to reduce the burden on parents and children.

No, it won't. Because I think these programs are conducive to the healthy development of children's physical and mental health. There is also a certain necessity.

support, children should have a happy childhood, instead of all kinds of interest classes, all kinds of pressure, there is no happiness at all, and there is pressure to bear when they grow up, so it is good to cancel training classes and interest classes.

I do not support the complete abolition of off-campus training classes and interest classes. Doing so will deprive children who really want to learn and will not be fair.

I don't support the total cancellation, if only the part of the cancellation is okay, because there are some children who attend the class interest class voluntarily, not that the parents force them to go, they have this interest, if it is canceled, then where do they go to class, to study.

Why are off-campus tutoring classes being cancelled? What are the pros and cons of off-campus tutoring classes? Do you agree to cancel?

For off-campus tutoring classes, in fact, many people are very disdainful, but we have to admit that many children actually have a lot of homework left behind in school, and at this time they need the existence of cram schools, and every extracurricular or off-campus tutoring class needs a certain amount of tutoring ability.

For many of our parents, it is a very normal thing for children to enroll in cram schools, so I personally think that extracurricular cram schools should not be banned, although they should be stopped, but for these cram schools, it is a matter of your will, if parents do not need it, they can not report it at all, there is no need to ban these classes. Every parent attaches great importance to their children's learning, so when the child does not study well, there may be a certain amount of pressure, and even a certain emotion for the child.

Extracurricular tutoring classes have become a matter that many parents consider, but in fact, as children, they can't understand some of the content in the class, because they don't pay attention in the class, or they just get distracted by what the teacher says, so they don't accept the class. If this class is not accepted, the next class may be left behind, so over time there will be a big lag behind these courses. Therefore, parents will use many ways to improve their children's grades.

Obviously, extracurricular tutoring classes are indeed useful, because the purpose of our parents to enroll their children in classes is to improve their children's grades, and after we really signed up for cram schools, we did find that children's grades have improved, and this is the final effect we have achieved, so extracurricular cram schools should not be banned. Although it cannot be said that it is fully supported, there is nothing wrong with their existence for these classes.

The disadvantage of the off-campus tutoring class is that it deprives the child of his spare time, and the advantage is that he can improve the child's academic performance, and I agree to cancel such a tutoring class.

The advantage of extracurricular tutoring classes is that they can improve children's grades, and then they can also learn some knowledge that children have not learned in the classroom, and the disadvantage is that the child may not study hard in the classroom, because he thinks that the extracurricular tutoring class is the same, so he will not listen carefully in the classroom, I don't agree with the cancellation, Because some children do need extracurricular tutoring classes to learn and be better.

Because for the sake of educational equity. Out-of-school tutoring benefits: It can improve some children's grades and allow them to study more courses.

Disadvantages: Some teachers do not teach in school, and they charge for tutoring outside the school, which breaks the principle of fairness, openness and fairness in education. I support the abolition of off-campus tutorial classes.

It's not canceled, it's all in progress.

The state implements a double reduction policy, but this does not completely abolish off-campus training institutions and cram schools.

Of course, the state has introduced such a policy to alleviate the dual pressure of parents and children. Too many cram schools are very financially stressful for parents, and for children, the day's learning tasks are already very heavy. After school, you have to face heavy tuition, and the pressure is also unacceptable.

In order to let the child return to the childhood state that he once had, as well as reduce the pressure of children's schoolwork, with the release of the double reduction policy issued by the state, but after the release of the double reduction policy, it has played a good effect in a short period of time.

For this phenomenon, many parents are also happy to see it, after all, for many parents, they can not help their children's homework, training classes and cram schools have become the best choice, and even some parents have no way to pick up their children on time, cram schools can also replace parents to pick up their children from school, play the role of trusteeship, is a double thing. It's just that the double reduction policy is more of a blow to the possibility of teachers in the school to open after-school training and tutoring institutions outside the school, so that teachers can educate children more seriously.

Therefore, if you want to completely abolish off-campus training institutions and cram schools, it is impossible and not suitable for you. Nowadays, off-campus training institutions and cram schools have become much more formalized, and at the same time solve the time and tutoring problems of many families, which still have a non-negligible role in children's learning and growth, so even if there is a double reduction policy, there will still be. Formal training and tuition institutions can stand tall and continue to engage in these professions.

Of course, I also think that one size fits all is not in line with today's national conditions, after all, the habit that has lasted for many years is canceled, and everyone is very uncomfortable.

Of course, it can be canceled, but the current education situation is very good, and the teacher is especially responsible when he lectures. The children are also very serious and can cancel a lot of cram schools and training institutions, and there is no need to spend money in vain.

Now and in the future, off-campus training institutions will not be canceled, not to mention thoroughly, even this kind of policy will not exist. The introduction of social capital to run education is the trend of the future, and training courses, as a way of social capital to run education, will only be strengthened, not weakened, let alone abolished.

It is not possible to completely abolish off-campus training institutions and cram schools, although the state has now introduced an education policy, but the children's learning pressure is still very large, and there are still a lot of off-campus training cram schools.

It is impossible, completely impossible to completely cancel, which is to blame for the general climate of the whole society

Can you cancel what you said, the root is demand, without demand it will naturally die, and if there is demand, it will always exist!

Society will only move forward, not regress, and if you want to cancel it, you can't do it unless you close yourself off

There is a demand, now the children are making up classes to study, children are the flowers of the motherland, and they must make up classes to study!

Ignorance of education sprays education indiscriminately, creates panic and anxiety, and destroys education.

Cancel a fart, cancel a shovel?

1. Let the teacher lose his "job".

We all know that off-campus tutoring classes are mainly for the purpose of profit, and off-campus tutoring classes can only maintain their business and produce economic benefits only by recruiting a certain number of students, and if all off-campus tutoring classes are banned and these off-campus tutoring classes are closed, then the teachers in the off-campus tutoring classes will lose their jobs and jobs, so from this perspective, the practice of banning all off-campus tutoring classes is not realistic, and laughter cannot maintain social stability.

2. It makes students lose the opportunity to receive better educational resources.

The reason why some parents enroll their children in off-campus tutorial classes is because they value that off-campus tutoring classes can provide more educational resources, and the content of their children's in-school learning is effective, and by enrolling in off-campus tutoring classes, their children can have the opportunity to learn more knowledge, so as to improve their academic performance. Especially for those students with poor grades, enrolling in off-campus tutorial classes can make up for their poor grades in subjects and strive for higher scores in exams.

The issue of abolishing all off-campus cultural classes and returning education to school is a complex education policy issue that involves many considerations. Here are some possible points for your reference:

Proponents' views may include:

1.Reducing students' academic burden: Abolishing off-campus cultural classes can reduce students' additional academic burden, allowing them to spend more time in on-campus curricula and extracurricular activities, which can help them achieve all-round development.

2.Promoting educational equity: Extracurricular remedial classes often require additional fees, which may result in students from poor families not having access to the same educational opportunities. The return of education to school can reduce the impact of economic disparities on educational equity.

3.Improve the quality of school education: Centralizing educational resources within the school can better monitor and manage the quality of teaching. Schools can strengthen the construction of teachers, provide better educational services, and improve students' learning outcomes.

Opponents' views may include:

1.Filling the gaps in schooling: Some people believe that schooling is deficient in some areas, and that extracurricular classes can provide additional learning resources and opportunities to help students fill in the gaps in schooling.

2.Respect for individual differences and interest development: Every student has different interests, strengths, and learning styles. Off-campus cultural classes can meet the individual needs of students and provide a more diverse educational experience.

3.Parents' right to choose: The ban on off-campus cultural classes may limit parents' right to choose their children's education methods, and some parents may think that off-campus tutoring classes are conducive to the development of children's comprehensive quality, and hope to continue to choose this type of education.