Are quality and income proportional to a certain extent?

Quality is the natural performance of a person, and income and quality I think there is no relationship, your income and your quality is not necessarily proportional, some people are very high-quality, but the income may be very low.

Well, I feel that it is proportional to a certain extent, because I think that the higher his quality, the higher his income, because the high quality can reflect some of his achievements as a person.

Yes, to a certain extent. Because the two go hand in hand. If the quality is high, the ability to make money may not be bad. When you have the ability to make money, you will want to improve your quality even more.

In general, the two are directly proportional, but there are exceptions. If a person of quality is too high-minded, he will not get the job he wants all at once.

It cannot be absolute, because the relationship between quality and income is not very large, and a person's good quality does not mean that his income is high, so they cannot become proportional to each other.

Indeed, to a certain extent, the level of quality does affect the level of income, and people with good quality can do better in interacting with people and working, and their income will be higher.

This is not necessarily the case, although some people are beggars and vagrants, but they are indeed very qualified, and they want to do their part when they see others suffering, but some high-income people do not have quality.

I don't think there is necessarily a direct proportion between quality and income, some people are very rich but their quality is really very poor, it depends on his education.

Most of the cases are like this, although there are a very few counter-examples, special circumstances, but from the perspective of probability, most of the rich people I know are highly educated, high-quality, responsible, tolerant, cautious, self-disciplined, and introverted.

This is certain, but not absolute. There is a certain truth in people's poor ambitions, and the different environments and circumstances will sometimes determine a person's world view, which will affect the quality. Remember that there is a saying, improve the quality of the population and do a good job in education for all.

Quality and education are directly proportional, but income and educational quality are not related.

Relatively speaking, the higher the education, the higher the quality of all aspects. However, it is not excluded that there are some people who have relatively high educational qualifications and poor quality. Because no matter what kind of group, there are special people.

There is a certain relationship, and the key reason is that the increase in wisdom will improve the quality.

A person's quality may have something to do with his income, but it is not absolute. People who are high in hail may also have lower qualities, and vice versa. A person's quality is related to his educational background, interpersonal relationships, professional skills, moral cultivation and other factors, which determine a person's development and performance in the workplace or society.

In addition, a person's income may also be affected by external factors, such as the industry, position, economic development, etc. Therefore, it is not possible to simply link a person's quality with income, but to conduct a comprehensive assessment from multiple aspects.

The quality of a person is directly related to money. I work as a bank credit card overdue collector, and 90% of the debtors I contact every day are of relatively low quality. When their credit card is overdue, they don't even think about paying it back.

After giving them a good idea, their attitude was also very bad. We are all hostile to the banks. Of course, they must also be a trustworthy person before they are overdue.

But after the deadline, they have no money to pay back, and they evade collection, and even deliberately make it difficult for the collectors, and their quality has become quite low.

It is natural to borrow money to repay debts, but this sentence came out of Jane's mouth, and it seemed so pale and weak.

Some people are overdue for three or five years, and they haven't gone a penny, and they are all empty numbers. The amount of overdue money they have is large and small, ranging from thousands of dollars to tens of thousands of dollars. Even if you still pay one or two thousand a month, it will be almost the same in a few years.

However, there are very few people who can take the initiative to repay, and the people we can contact who have the intention to repay have repeatedly promised, but in the end they have not fulfilled them. Some people are even more arrogant, asking why we call them **, why they borrowed money based on their own ability, and why they have to pay it back. People who say such things are born with such low quality, definitely not, or they have no money, and the money in their pockets determines a person's mentality and conduct.

From the people I know, most of the cases are like this. Although there are very few counter-examples and special circumstances, from the perspective of probability, most of the rich people I know are highly educated, high-quality, responsible, tolerant, cautious and self-disciplined, and introverted. Most of the poor are low-educated, retaliate against society, shirk responsibility, arrogant, narrow-minded, lack of public morality and some basic moral outlook on right and wrong.

Especially in the face of doubts, frustrations, pressures, or things that you don't understand, your moral outlook, IQ, and EQ will immediately go to zero. I myself belong to a middle-income family from the extreme poverty through schooling. It is indeed arrogant, selfish, narrow-minded, and extreme.

These shortcomings really helped me move from the destitute class to the class I am now. But it also prevented me from entering the affluent class. A lot of friends are also helping me change.

I've also been learning from some of my family and friends about their strengths.

Hongyun Education:

First of all, family background is certainly not proportional to personal quality. For example, he is a profligate, unlearned, lazy person, even if his family background is good, he does not accept quality education at all, or does not understand the truth of being a man at all, then he is not a high-quality person, whether it is in terms of moral character or comprehensive ability.

Secondly, the level of education and personal quality are certainly not directly proportional. In recent years, there have been frequent incidents of campus violence in some colleges and universities in China. Can you be considered a person who poisons his classmates because of some trivial things? The answer is all no.

However, I do not deny that there is a relationship between family background and education level and personal quality, and there is a positive correlation in many cases, although there are many examples of the opposite.

There is definitely a relationship between personal qualities and the level of education, but it is not necessarily proportional.