Which picture quality is better, Sony s HX850 or Sharp s LX840A? Are all Sony s screens made by Sams

HX850 is a Samsung screen, HX920 and HX850 have the same screen, HX920 has 800x speed and intelligent area backlight, HX850 has natural skin tone adjustment, 3D super resolution technology. Theoretically, Sharp's four-color screen is better,In fact, it feels about the same,HX850The picture quality is good,The picture is transparent,High contrast。 If you really want to talk about picture quality,PanasonicST50The color is better than SonyHX850 and SharpLX840A,The picture processing is softer,**It is not as dazzling as the high-sharpness and high-brightness picture of LCD,The dynamic effect is also better than LCD。

Seeing it with your own eyes, even if words can't describe it, you can immediately feel the difference in image quality.

Sony's HX850 is one of Sony's flagship models in 2012, with a "natural" exterior design, using a gorgeous obsidian LCD panel, in 2012, Sony fully upgraded the X-Reality X-Reality Pro Sharp image processing engine, as well as a thin LED backlight, MotionFlow XR 800 quadruple speed drive 800, and other high-end configurations. The effect can be thought of as if it should not be very bad. As for SharpLX840Although it is also a high-end TV this year, in addition to 4-color panel, Duba audio, support WIFI network TV function, etc.

The rest is the same as the usual Sharp design, nothing new, and the consistent handling of chips. The TV picture is really poor. Sharp、Sony、Although Panasonic still has some core TV technologies,But in the face of the rapid development of China's color TV and South Korean color TV brands, it is now sunset。

There is also a note to buy Sharp,The profit of Sharp TV is the highest in the color TV industry,Nearly 20%More than rebates,So many channels are mainly promoting it。 Moreover, Sharp has the highest repair rate, the most dead pixels, the fewest interfaces, the worst functions, and the remote control is difficult to operate. Sony's screens are not all produced by Samsung,There used to be a S-LCD and Samsung's joint venture screen factory,Now Sony has divested due to long-term losses,The screens on the market are mainly AUO、And other Taiwanese companies, as well as a small number of Samsung and LGD screens。

Sony's screen is produced by Samsung and assembled in Hon Hai Foxconn, and Sharp's screen is produced by itself and assembled in Hon Hai Foxconn (because Sharp's largest shareholder is Hon Hai Foxconn).

So it is recommended to buy Samsung, domestic is also OK, affordable.

Sharp is about to go bankrupt, just waiting for Terry Gou to buy it, not to mention anything else, it is estimated that the after-sales will be a problem after buying, Sony is also losing huge losses every year, big layoffs, there is only a bunch of water army left, Sony's high-end screen is bought from Samsung, the low-end screen is bought from Taiwan's Chimeidian, that is, Terry Gou's factory, enough garbage, Sony's movement is bought from Toshiba or TSMC, just an OEM, why bother to buy Sony around the bend?

I think it's Samsung, Sony is not a professional screen, it can be said that it is a layman of liquid crystal, it is compared to Sharp and Samsung, but now Sharp's loss is very strong, many technologies are many years ago, and there has been no innovation for a long time, and Samsung is still ahead of the curve in terms of innovation, not to mention that some time ago, Samsung has acquired some shares of Sharp, it is said that the new technologies researched by Sharp in the future must be used by Samsung before other brands can be discussed, so let me choose I choose Samsung.

All LCD panel core technologies are in Sharp's hands. But the panels in South Korea and mainland Taiwan have great advantages. And Sanxingdui has done a good job in grasping the Chinese market.

Only in the Chinese market can there be people who compare Korean products with Japanese products. In fact, South Korea's grade is similar to China's. Some people just can't hold their heads up.

What do you want to do so clearly, you can see it clearly, Japanese and Korean manufacturers are not reliable, Samsung is now doing everything, and it can't do anything well.

Among the three, Sharp and Samsung do the best, followed by Sony. If you want to choose, it is recommended to choose Samsung, and if you choose Sharp, you may be punished as a traitor. Hehe...

I have a good impression of Sharp, and the screen has been doing very well. But now it's true that Samsung is doing better. Sony is not good at this.

Last year, I went to the home appliance city to watch TV,They all said that Sharp's is good,I bought Sharp's LCD-40LX440A,I just bought it at home, I can't turn it on,Change one,The plastic smell of this TV is very strong,It's been a few months,That's not to say,Every time I want to watch a TV series,Press the switch of the plug row,There is no problem with the power supply of the TV set-top box,This"Uncle"There is no electricity, and you have to unplug the power plug and plug it in again a few times to be easy to use, at first I thought it was a problem with the plug row, and I changed a few or so, and the after-sales personnel looked at it, there was still a quality problem, and it had passed the replacement period, and it could not be replaced but repaired.

Who doesn't say their stuff is good? Many domestic hard screens that use LG Philips joint venture brand IPS Of course, they say that their own things are good, but they are international manufacturers, including Philips LG itself, have not said that the soft screen is good, the hard screen is good.

Because IPS hard screen is LG's technology.

Top? No, it's not all Taiwan, it's not all its own screen.

The hard screen has a higher refresh rate than the soft screen, so it can get better dynamic image quality than the soft screen LCD. But compared with plasma, hard-screen LCD technology is still not worth mentioning.

Sony's screens are all Samsung's, and the movements are all TSMC or Fujifilm's, anyway, there is nothing to produce by itself, so I know to deceive consumers, and now I can't deceive it, Sony loses a lot every year.

Sony's screens are not made by themselves,The panel business is losing to death,10,000 layoffs this year,Half of which are screen cuts。

Sony's screen is made by Samsung, and Sharp's largest shareholder is Terry Gou, what do you say.

These two, half a catty and eight taels.

If you want to check the data of the response time, it is that the LCD has a drag, it depends on whether you are used to it or not.

Sony's panel must have been made by someone else, as for whether it is made in Taiwan or Korea, it is not clear.

Sharp's panel is four primary colors,The color is more saturated and gorgeous,It's hard to say whether the panel is doing it yourself,Now60Inches or more are basically Sharp's own,The following can be said uncertainly。

Both of these are 3D TVs, Sony's shutter type, the effect is good, but the glasses are very expensive, and it hurts to look at it for a long time; Sharp is polarized, that is, it is not flashing, and it comes with several pairs of glasses, and the effect is okay.

The interfaces are pretty much the same, with a little more messy features from Sony.

Finally, Sony's cheap, Sharp's more expensive 2000

In fact, if you want to buy LCD, Samsung is a good choice, LG is OK, Sony is really average now, especially my goods here, the quality is just like that. Sharp is relatively better.

If you want to barely see the trail, it's better to buy plasma, after all, you have about 10,000 yuan. Panasonic, almost. Of course, there are also Samsung's, but Panasonic is still recommended.

Only Changhong does domestic production, and I don't know much about it. However, plasma burn-in is a troublesome point, don't fix it on a motionless screen for too long for a long time.

Hehe, the first floor must be a Sony fan. I'm also a Sony fan, but I tell the landlord objectively: the display technology of the high-end TV brand Sharp is the best.

Take these two TVs separately as a comparison,SonyKDL-46HX850Win in LED screen and cost performance。 Sharp LCD-46LX840 wins in Gui Lilong four-color screen technology.

Let me tell you briefly, the LED screen is the mainstream today, compared with the Sharp LCD screen, in terms of brightness, side angle visibility, and power saving, it is not a little bit more than LCD. Sony's KDL-46HX850 uses an LED screen, which is much more cost-effective than Sharp. However, Sony uses the classic three-color technology, which makes it inferior to the LCD-46LX840 of Sharp, which uses Gui Lilong's four-color technology, in terms of sharpness and sharpness.

At the same time, in terms of dynamic fluency, Sharp's LCD-46LX840 is also much more stable than Sony's KDL-46HX850.

Both TVs are high-end, and it mainly depends on which aspect you prefer. If you have any other questions, please feel free to continue the exchange.

LCD,LED,Plasma has its own advantages and disadvantages,What I can tell you is that the so-called various drag problems you really play almost can't notice or can't see at all,All kinds of entanglements in advance don't matter,And then the performance of this generation of consoles is like that,Do you think you can play anything more with the best TV。

If you have a budget of less than 10,000 yuan, don't think about Samsung or something. The grade is too low. And it's a country flagship. If you want to play games, Sony. The chip is the world's top. But only for pure gaming. All things considered, Sharp 640A.

Samsung 46es6100 is good, Samsung is now the world's No. 1 sales, and it speaks with strength. Sharp is about to go bankrupt, waiting for Guo Taiming to buy it, and then the after-sales will be a problem, I don't dare to buy it, I only believe in the market. As for Sony?

Forget it, Sony's high-end screen is still bought from Samsung, and the low-end model is bought from Taiwan's Chimei Electric, which is Terry Gou's company, which is enough garbage!

Also buy Japanese goods???

Liquid crystal tailing is unavoidable!!

But compared to Sharp, you should choose Sony, after all, people make their own games.

If you have this budget, you should still prefer plasma, Panasonic.

Different brands, configurations, design concepts, suitable groups, etc. are also different, each has its own advantages, it is recommended to choose the right model according to needs and preferences. For detailed model information of Samsung products, please log on to the official website - click on the magnifying glass icon in the upper right corner to enter the model query.

Samsung is good, cost-effective, good picture quality, Sharp and Sony have lost the power of innovation, and technology is declining, especially Sony, which has suffered big losses for four consecutive years. Sharp used to be the father of liquid crystals, but now it is surpassed by its apprentices, mainly because there are too many quality problems. Sony has no technical research at all, the movement is TSMC and Samsung's, the screen is Samsung's, what to buy a Sony picture?

Product performance score display.

Samsung UA55D8000 450 points.

Sharp LED - 52X50A 420 points.

Sony KDL-55HX920 350 points.

Samsung is the best, Sony is the second.

Samsung has already generated trillions ($20 billion) in revenue in 2011. Samsung, the world's No. 1 company, is Apple's main supplier of smartphones, tablets and other device parts, such as the OEM production of Retina displays and A5X processors for Apple's new iPad.

Sony's screen was bought from Samsung, and then Foxconn OEM, you say it can be like this, except for some people blowing Sony on the Internet, what else can it be.

Personally, I don't think these are as good as Skyworth,Skyworth TV is very good,You three are generally better than Sony,Japanese brand,The effect should be okay。

Isn't it just TV, buy domestic products, it's not bad.