The military is better at keeping the peace than diplomacy, please, and let me know tonight

The Korean War, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Indo-Pakistani war, these examples show that war is more effective in maintaining peace?

If there is to be peace, there will be real peace only when the strength of both sides is equal.

Get along in harmony, there is a saying that "home and everything is prosperous"!

Although it is a period of peace, other countries are more advanced than our country, and their construction is better than ours, and if our country does not catch up with them quickly, it will end up like the Qing Dynasty.

The first is to defend against the threat of force from major powers (such as the United States), and the second is to prevent the arrogance and provocation of small and belligerent countries (such as Vietnam).

China's surrounding security environment is still facing a huge threat

1. The reunification of the motherland is facing a complicated situation (Taiwan, Xinjiang).

2. The United States poses a comprehensive threat to China's security (political, military, and the Taiwan issue) 3. Japan's actual and potential threats to China (military threat, the Taiwan issue, maritime and island disputes) 4. The Sino-Indian border issue remains unresolved.

5. Disputes over the ownership of islands with Southeast Asian countries.

6. The fight against terrorism faces both opportunities and challenges.

1. In order to occupy a favorable position in the multipolar strategic pattern, China must strive to enhance its comprehensive national strength, including economy, science and technology, and national defense. Strengthening national defense and army building is an important measure to enhance international competitiveness, resist hegemonism and power political pressure, and safeguard national independence and sovereignty. This is also the need to safeguard the country's ever-expanding strategic interests.

2. Without the support of a strong national defense, the various rights and interests of the country will not be reliably safeguarded. In the international struggle, we can only allow the forces of power to run unbridled with impunity, not to mention become an influential pole in the international strategic structure.

There is no real peace. The present peace is only a break between the next war and the last. The army is now being developed so that the next time the war comes, it will be able to repel the aggressor at the minimum cost.

When the army is strong, other countries will not dare to invade, just imagine, between people, who will take the initiative to provoke people with very strong fighting strength! Right.

Is it really peaceful? Why can't you see that the situation around China is so turbulent, can the North Korean issue, the East China Sea issue, the South China Sea issue, and the Taiwan Strait issue be solved with a single mouth?

World peace depends on fists and mouths, there is no real peaceful world, the peace we see now is only caused by the constraints of forces in all aspects, the most powerful indication is that at the beginning of the last century, all countries came to carve up China, and China became a colony, that is, it should be China's weak national strength at that time, and there was no strong force to make every country want to come to China to occupy some wealth, and now China is no longer the China at that time, and the country's surroundings are also peaceful, what does it rely on? It's the force, who dares to provoke the powerful China now, the mouth is also supported by force, there is no strong backstage, what are you going to quarrel with others, when others are unhappy and threaten each other, you say be careful I throw a nuclear bomb to you, if your country's armed forces are not strong, there is no nuclear bomb, what are you threatening others? Therefore, the peace of the world depends on the balance of force and strong diplomatic capabilities in various places, and humanistic care is pure nonsense, and human beings are not so noble.

For the time being, it depends on the balance of military power. If aliens attack Earth, humanity itself will be at peace.

Rely on the lovely Chinese people, endure and endure

Yes, there should be no idea of peace in the eyes of the soldiers, the existence of the soldiers is to defend the country, prevent aggression, and always be prepared for war, just like a captain of SAS said: we never want the negotiations to be successful, because if every negotiation can solve the problem, there is no meaning for our existence!

A soldier is born for war, and only in war can the value of a soldier be experienced. Any country has soldiers who are always ready to start a war or to stop it. The so-called peace in the eyes of the military is nothing more than the time required to prepare for war.

The concept of peace of military personnel is different from that of ordinary people, and military personnel have to use military means to stop and end the war in exchange for peace.

For servicemen, there are only times of war and preparation for war.

Yes, the military is the biggest victim of war. They very much want peace, but it is up to them to maintain it, and they are always ready for war.