Which is better, business editor or central enterprise? It is better for central enterprises or publ

The business editor and the central enterprise are all good, and in general, they have their own merits.

First of all, let's look at the establishment of public institutions, which generally refers to the establishment of public institutions.

For example, in many public institutions, the real establishment of the career may only be the leaders of a few units, and most of the others are full-time contract workers.

In addition, at present, public institutions are undergoing preliminary reforms, and some public welfare categories.

In the future, public institutions will be directly converted into administrative units.

Some competitive institutions may embark on the road of becoming subsidiaries of state-owned enterprises after being acquired and merged by central enterprises or state-owned enterprises, so if you go to public institutions at this time and have a establishment, there is a high probability that the way out in the future is these two ways:

Either directly transfer to the administrative unit, or become an employee of a state-owned enterprise or a central enterprise.

Let's talk about central enterprises, generally speaking, when people refer to central enterprises, they mainly refer to the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission.

In fact, in addition to the 96 central enterprises responsible for supervision and management, there are also some ministerial-level central enterprises, such as the railway corporation.

There are also some central enterprises under the jurisdiction of state ministries and commissions, such as several large state-owned banks.

Wait. <>

Generally speaking, because of the state-owned background and special status of central enterprises, although the central enterprises themselves belong to enterprises, they can actually be regarded as within the system in a broad sense.

For example, although many office workers of central enterprises and state-owned enterprises do not have an establishment, the leadership team and formal employees of central enterprises and state-owned enterprises must formally report to the higher-level organizational department.

Therefore, if you go to work in a central enterprise, the work itself will be more stable like that of civil servants, especially the headquarters of central enterprises or the headquarters of subordinate secondary units, which are very good, and there is an advantage, that is, after all, central enterprises participate in market competition, and employee salaries tend to be market-orientedSo the employees of central enterprisesSalaryTreatment, often higher than civil servants and public institution personnel

That's my opinion on this issue, I hope it will be helpful to you.

It should be that the central enterprises are better, the welfare of the central enterprises is very good, and the income and treatment of the headquarters and secondary units of the central enterprises are much higher than the establishment of the business.

The career editor, whether it is society or family, has a very high degree of recognition, and it is an iron rice bowl with relatively stable development.

Summary. Hello dear, compared with the same level, the overall public institutions are better than state-owned enterprises. The advantage of public institutions lies in their establishment, ensuring income in droughts and floods, and basically not having the risk of being laid off and unemployed.

The disadvantage is that it is too stable, the salary standard is basically the same, there is no obvious gap between each other's income, there is no distinction between each other in promotion, and the advantages are not obvious. The state-owned enterprises are different, the income comes from the operation, there is no financial support, the good and bad treatment of the operation is very different, some are so rich that they are oily, some are on the verge of bankruptcy and cannot pay their wages, the drought is drought, the waterlogging is dead, and the gap between them is relatively large. Compared with the same level, the average level of public institutions is higher than that of state-owned enterprises in terms of income, stability, and social status.

Hello dear, I'm happy to answer for you, the work of the public institution is stable, the welfare is good, the retirement salary is also high, and the work is done step by step day day after day; The development space of the enterprise unit is large, the competitiveness is strong, and the self-improvement is strong, but the welfare treatment is relatively low. You should know how to choose, right?

Hello dear, compared with the same level, the overall public institutions are better than state-owned enterprises. The advantage of the industrial units in the state lies in the establishment of the situation, the guarantee of income in drought and flood, and the fact that there is basically no risk of being laid off and unemployed. The disadvantage is that it is too stable, the salary is basically the same, there is no obvious gap between each other's income, there is no distinction between each other in promotion, and the advantages are not obvious.

The state-owned enterprises are different, the income comes from the operation, there is no financial support, the good and bad treatment of the operation is very different, some are so rich that they are oily, some are on the verge of bankruptcy and cannot pay their wages, the drought is drought, the waterlogging is dead, and the gap between them is relatively large. Compared with the same level, the average level of public institutions is higher than that of state-owned enterprises in terms of income, stability, and social status.

Public institutions and central enterprises are better than central enterprises.

From the perspective of salary, the salary and treatment of working in central enterprises are higher than those of general institutions. From the perspective of future development prospects, the development prospects of central enterprises are better than those of public institutions.

The difference between a state-owned enterprise and a shanty unit:

1. The type of preparation is different.

Public institutions uniformly use the establishment of undertakings, but they are divided into three positions: management, technical and service.

State-owned enterprises do not have a establishment, but in fact they are managed by an administrative model, and like civil servants, they are also reported to the competent department at a higher level or the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) in accordance with the ranks. Personnel of state-owned enterprises who have reached a certain level can be directly transferred to administrative institutions if they are compared with the deputy department, and they are not restricted by the status of enterprise personnel and do not need to take examinations.

2. Different ways of financial support.

Public institutions are divided into administrative, public welfare, and production and operation.

The administrative category is the same as the civil servant, it is fully funded by the government, and this round of institutional reform has been cancelled, and most of them have been changed to the public welfare category: the public welfare category is divided into the first, second and third categories of public welfare, the first category is all fully funded by the government, the second category is the difference, and the third category is part of the difference, and part of the self-support. Production and operation are generally self-supporting in nature, and the state does not invest funds, and all of them are operated by units or retained by fees to maintain operation.

The state has clearly required that the reform be completed by the end of 2020 and all of them will be transferred to the market.

As for state-owned enterprises, as the name suggests, they are enterprises, and the state does not invest funds to bear the operation of the units, and all of them are raised and supported by the enterprises themselves.

3. The nature of the institution is different.

Public institutions are a supplement to administrative agencies, mainly replacing the public welfare service functions such as science, education, culture and health. To put it bluntly, state-owned enterprises are enterprises, but in order to control or facilitate the management of some industries that involve the national economy and people's livelihood and are closely related to the interests of the people, Wang Sen's state realizes the dominance of enterprises through state-owned capital holding or shareholding. <>

of central enterprises. Central enterprises are generally placed by the personnel departments of provincial and municipal enterprises, and electricity, banks, tobacco companies, and resources are all relatively good enterprises. Enterprises implement contract management, according to the position to determine the personal status of treatment, only in the ability is strong, the overall quality is high, there is no restriction on development, is a better employment choice.

Wholly state-owned company.

Fully funded by ** and subject to the Companies Act.

Specification. This type of enterprise focuses on social and public goals, and economic goals are secondary. Such enterprises are mainly typical natural monopolies and resource enterprises, such as railways, tap water, natural gas, electricity, airports, etc.

From an economic point of view, the products or services of such enterprises should be based on marginal cost.

or average cost pricing to achieve social welfare.

Summary. Glad your question was <>

If it's both formal, it's actually good for both, but if you're more inclined to be stable and relaxed, then the first choice is a public institution. After all, public institutions are organized, although the salary is not higher than that of state-owned enterprises, but the welfare is also good, in addition, the work pressure is not great, and the cost performance of the work is higher. In addition, in terms of gender, women are more likely to choose public institutions, and men are more likely to choose state-owned enterprises.

Which is better, state-owned enterprises or public institutions?

Glad your question Zen Mask kissed <>

If it's both formal, it's actually good for both, but if you're more inclined to be stable and relaxed, then the first choice is a public institution. After all, public institutions are organized, although the salary is not higher than that of state-owned enterprises, but the welfare of He Ruhao is also good, in addition, the work pressure is not great, and the cost performance of the work is higher. In addition, in terms of sex bench travel, women are more recommended to choose public institutions, and men are more recommended to choose state-owned enterprises.

In terms of wage income, the wage income of state-owned enterprises that generate good income is generally higher than that of public institutions. The group of state-owned enterprises is very large, some are so rich, and some can't open the pot, after all, state-owned enterprises pay their own salaries, and generate more income, and the corresponding income, year-end bonuses and the like will go up; But if you don't generate enough income, your income will also go down. However, in general, the income of most state-owned enterprises is still higher than that of public institutions.

In terms of work intensity, the work intensity of public institutions is generally lower than that of state-owned enterprises. Compared with state-owned enterprises, the work content and work pressure of public institutions are much smaller, after all, there are no business indicators, especially public welfare institutions, the saturation of work is very average, generally 9 to 5, and there is very little overtime; After all, the second-class public institutions are the difference in financial allocation, and it is normal to work overtime, but the strength of the sail sales is not too big; In fact, overtime in state-owned enterprises is very common, a partner graduated and worked in a central enterprise, working overtime almost every day, and also working overtime on weekends, although he earns a lot, but he is also very tired.

In terms of stabilizing the hail of Zheng demolition, the stability of public institutions is stronger. Although the regular workers of state-owned enterprises are also very stable, they are still inferior to those of having an establishment. In terms of the development of the industry, the two are similar.

Whether it is a public institution or a state-owned enterprise, promotion is not a simple matter, nor does it mean that you work very hard, you will be able to become a leader, this not only depends on the individual's ability to work and sail, interpersonal communication ability, and the ability to deal with things are equally important.

Summary. Hello, the differences between the business editor and the central state-owned enterprises are: first, the purpose of the establishment of state-owned enterprises is different, and the purpose of state-owned enterprises is to pursue the preservation and appreciation of state-owned assets; **Enterprises are an important pillar of China's national economy; Public institutions refer to those established by the state for the purpose of social welfare.

2. The investment founders are different state-owned enterprises invested or controlled by the first state or the federal government, including both the first enterprise and the enterprise controlled by the local government. An enterprise is a state-owned enterprise supervised and managed by the company.

Hello, the differences between the business editor and the central state-owned enterprises are: first, the purpose of the establishment of state-owned enterprises is different, and the purpose of state-owned enterprises is to pursue the preservation and appreciation of state-owned assets; **Enterprises are an important pillar of China's national economy; Public institutions are founded by the state for the purpose of social welfare. The two empty clans and the founders of the investment are different state-owned enterprises invested or controlled by the first or the first state of the state, including the first enterprises, and the enterprises that are invested and controlled by the local government.

An enterprise is a state-owned enterprise supervised and managed by the company.

What is the difference between these two and the impact on personal life and production?

There is no impact.