Could you objectively evaluate the merits and faults of Satler? Was Sitler a great man?

Objectively speaking, his credit may be to promote the development of science and technology (a large number of advanced technologies are used in the army); Other than that, it doesn't seem to take much credit Don't tell me any nonsense about World War II promoting human reflection or something, it's not a credit at all).

His mistakes have created a nightmare for mankind, destroyed countless families, brought several countries to the brink of collapse, almost destroyed a nation, created and propagated the Nazi ideology of endless disasters, cultivated a group of madmen and murderers, and brought the ugly and indifferent side of human nature to the extreme.

He's a very powerful man, but he's definitely not going to be a great man.

Human society is not a tropical jungle, here we have to follow not only the law of the jungle, but also human nature--- respect for and protect the right of other life to live. So he was only a sinner, not a great man. Although he influenced the 20th century and continues to do so today.

Personally, I think he's a madman with quite a serious mental illness and most likely a certain childhood shadow and growth defects.

I strongly support Hitler, if a person does not adapt to the challenges and choices of nature or society, then he should disappear and give the saved means of living to people who can adapt to society better, so that the overall level of human society can continue to develop, people are also animals, Darwin has long said that things are natural selection, survival of the fittest, if this person does not adapt to society, does not adapt to nature, then why should we let him occupy limited living resources to make those who adapt to better survival, Of course, I can't agree with Hitler's method of judging inferior people, I can't judge it only by blood and genes, I believe that the Germanic nation has those who can't adapt to society, and the Jews also have elites, and they can't generalize, of course, I also oppose Hitler's radical policy of national destruction, and now in our country due to the system or history and the gap between urban and rural areas, the disadvantage of the disadvantaged groups is not caused by their own reasons, but in the future, when the society such as the compulsory education system and other systems are perfect, Those who are unable to gain a foothold in society are entirely their own fault, and I am categorically opposed to giving them any subsidies and leaving them to fend for themselves. Sorry, I digress.

Hitler's main merit was to develop the blitzkrieg, a very effective tactical means for future wars, and his devilish eloquence, leadership skills, and outstanding personality are worth learning from future generations, as well as the world war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Europe caused by his radical and self-righteous policies.

Regarding his merits and demerits, Wu Fengjing has already talked about it.

What I want to say is that every famous historical figure has the significance of its existence, that is, the role of promoting the development of history. But according to people's concepts, they will still be given a good and bad one. Hitler undoubtedly belonged to a villain, a sinner.

Of course, great men can't talk about it, that's praise. But it's called a hero, and it's still deserved.

Personally, I think he can be called a great man, no matter how extreme his thoughts and actions are, but he.

He has done what we can't, and I agree with him.

The ...... of great men produced during that period—

Great men, of course.

The credit free Germans commented--- they were really good.

Agree with Wu Fengjing's opinion. The reason why some people in China liked Hitler was because Germany was a rising star in Europe, but it defeated the old empires of Britain and France. They also fantasize that one day they too will be able to emulate Germany.

But times are different, and gone are the days when modern wars alone relied on war to conquer other countries. Modern politicians like to use democracy, human rights, and anti-terrorism as a pretext to not seek military occupation of a country, but only to establish a pro-own regime in that country, or to build a military base. The goal can be achieved by using political, economic, and military deterrence, and the United States is a strong player in this regard.

Wouldn't it be more effective to dress yourself up as a world policeman than the sheer force of Germany.

Be. One day, there will be such a figure in China, and I will be the first to support him.

It is a martyr's sacrifice for human progress!

Historically, yes, after all, how many disasters did World War II bring to the people of the world? But for his own country, there are good and bad, because after all, he is the one who has survived the country, and Germany is already on the verge of economic collapse. For the sake of the country, they are all poor people.

But the poor must have something to hate, and they should not transfer their suffering to others, how many homes have been shattered, how many cities have been destroyed, how many civilizations have been destroyed, artillery fire has been rampant, and fascism is rampant. Therefore, from the perspective of world history, there is no doubt that he can be called a historical sinner.

In World War I, the Austro-Hungarian Crown Prince went to newly annexed Bosnia to review military exercises with Serbia as an imaginary enemy, and on June 28, 1914, he was assassinated in Sarajevo by members of Serbian nationalist organizations, which became known as the Sarajevo Incident. This event was the trigger for the First World War.

World War II, on September 1, 1939, the German army launched a blitzkrieg against Poland, and on September 3, Britain and France declared war on Germany, and World War II broke out. The German army summed up the lessons of World War I, developed a blitzkrieg method of concentrated use of air power and armored clusters to carry out a large-depth assault, and exerted its power in Poland, the Polish army was divided and surrounded before it had time to gather troops, the planes did not have time to take off, and the artillery was destroyed before it had time, the German army successfully broke into Poland, and after Britain and France declared war, they stood still and sat back and watched Poland perish, which was called the "sit-down war", and on September 28, Warsaw fell, and Poland fell.

the Sarajevo events during World War I; During World War II, Hitler fought in Poland, which really opened the curtain of World War II.

I don't know how it really is, but World War II was indeed caused by him.