Debate Tournament The reputation of a college depends on whether the teacher or the student is prese

Updated on amusement 2024-04-19
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Of course, if there are no good students, colleges and universities will not pull out good teachers, and if you put Bill Gates in China, he is not necessarily awesome. Why, because of the different ways of education and the surrounding environment, under the influence of China's thousands of years of feudal society, our teachers are different from foreign countries, even if Bill Gates, let us Chinese education, he can't be so awesome. You talk about whether there is a person like Bill Gates in China. Obviously, no, moreover, if there is no student's own qualifications, I think no matter how good a teacher is, he is only in **. The reason why colleges and universities are colleges and universities is because they have good students, so the reason why we discuss the origin of colleges and universities is that of course we will not use the poor students of each school to evaluate whether he is a college or not, it is meaningless, right, so in the end, it is because good students have higher IQ ability than poor students, and the same teacher is handed over to have different students, which can only show that the creation is in the individual, and it can only show that colleges and universities have a high reputation because of the existence of students.

    Claw machine Mar word for the best.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Doha, you see one year a college student at Peking University splashed a bear in the zoo with sulfuric acid, this is a typical example!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    If the student's own conditions are not good, no matter how good the teacher is, it will be in vain to teach according to his aptitude. However, students and teachers should be connected, and the idea of this debate topic is to let students and teachers understand it, so it, dear, you can pick it up, and the final result should be that both of you win.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Positively, the teacher is more important.

    1.The so-called university is not only a building, but also a master.

    Maxima often has, but Bole does not often have.

    What is the misguided child?

    Teachers are important.

    There are no good teachers.

    No matter how good a seedling is, it can't grow into a big tree.

    3.If a teacher does not know how to use some methods to make students memorize problems deeply, then potential students will not be able to read well.

    4. If there is no teacher, then your knowledge is the best to come, although the student is the main one, but the teacher is also an important force that can not be ignored.

    On the other hand, students are more important.

    1.I believe that students are the gems of talent. And the teacher is the open-minded one who excavates this gem.

    I do the opposite. Students can volunteer for school. And the teacher can't teach the air to put 2

    If a student encounters the education of a good teacher, but he himself does not work hard and is not good at writing.

    3.Because it is the student himself and not the teacher who wants to learn, the teacher only assists him and gives him a room for improvement.

    In other words, the teacher is just a staircase, and the student is stepping on his neck!

    It's up to the students. How can a lazy student study well? Have you ever studied dedication and work? Confucius said that the most difficult thing to teach is lazy students.

    What's more, the knowledge learned is the student's own. How can it not be up to students to learn well?

    You can also view the aspect. The average person's IQ is 100, and the left socks are stupid and right. Why do the same teachers teach so many students with different grades?

    It's the student's problem. It's not the teacher's problem.

    You can give more examples, or you can use stories from the ancients or famous quotes.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    1 In the classroom, in terms of the proportion of the number of students, there are always fewer teachers and more students. Teachers play a leading role in the classroom.

    2 Judging from the number of speeches in class, there is also a teacher who is much more than many students. In the classroom of college students, even the professor speaks and speaks.

    Looking at the level of teachers, it affects the learning effect of students.

    1 Because of human differences, students taught by high-level teachers are generally higher than those taught by low-level teachers. In a university classroom, a good lecturer is able to maximize students' attention and devote as much time as possible to effective teaching. According to the characteristics of college students, reasonable arrangement, the content of the narration is thought-provoking, fascinating, and unconsciously enlightening.

    2 There is also the attitude of teachers towards students, which also has a profound impact on students. If the professor praises or positive hints, college students are encouraged, their self-confidence is enhanced, and the purpose of learning is clearer, and the effect is remarkable. The purpose of learning for college students is more clear than that of primary and secondary school students, and their self-control is also greatly enhanced compared with that of primary and secondary school students.

    The attitude towards learning is even higher than ever. Teachers give few or even organized lectures. The state of the students tends to be stable, and the temporary situation in the classroom is reduced to a minimum.

    The teacher's main focus is on lecturing.

    It follows that the role of the teacher is very important in the world of students.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The counter-argument of speculation is that honor depends primarily on others.

    First of all, let's analyze the debate, honor, that is, the reputation and honor that is widely spread because of achievements and status, mainly depends on oneself, that is, plays more of a role for oneself. So it's a comparative debate. The point of contention in this debate is whether one's own (and not others') honor is produced or obtained primarily by oneself or by others.

    First of all, it should be pointed out that the disadvantage is that honor is indeed given by others, and what is generated by oneself is a sense of honor, and honor is a social and historical category. Different societies or different classes praise and disapprove the same behavior differently or even the opposite, for example, historically, for manual labor, the exploiting class is ashamed of labor, and laborers are proud of hard work. In other words, to obtain honor, it is inseparable from the general environment.

    It must be admitted that both oneself and others (in fact, in this case, the group) are indispensable for the generation of honor.

    Let's take a look at the individual's sexuality.

    1.You must have the same values as the masses, otherwise no matter how good you are, you will not be recognized, not to mention honor. (There are many examples, and the one above is one.) (necessity).

    2.On the premise of the former, there must be more outstanding performance, that is, to do better than others, in order to get honor. (more primary).

    3. Personal honor is the embodiment and component of collective honor, and collective honor is the foundation and destination of individual honor. Once again, it is proved that the acquisition of one's honor depends on one's willingness to contribute to the collective, and the collective will cannot be changed by individual changes, so individual cooperation and efforts are more important. That is, the honor depends mainly on oneself.

    Resources.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    From the teacher's point of view, a good teacher should not only give lectures, but also be good at enlivening the classroom atmosphere and making students interested in the subject, so as to ensure the quality of the class.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Students don't learn well mainly because of the teacher's problem.

    It should be noted that this refers to the main reason, not that it is all up to the teacher to decide whether the learning is bad, first exclude the teacher's ability theory, and then return to the main topic for discussion; - Psychologists have experimented: Divide students into two groups: Group A: The teacher tells you that your IQ is not low, and you will definitely be able to work hard in the future!

    As long as you are diligent and studious, you will definitely have academic results! And the class training meeting of Group B will be revealed: No!

    I think the students are too stupid and have low emotions! And both groups of subjects are taught by the same teacher! After a year of experimentation, the results were:

    The results of Class A are all excellent, and there are only a few top students in the group with good grades! Some of the grades are average, and a small number of students fail! This proves the suggestion and the criterion effect of stillness.

    In addition, the teacher's magic heart is professional, and the flexible and effective teaching methods also play an obvious role! You can also use the method of teaching students according to their aptitude, encourage backward students to follow up, and draw him to establish the quantity and confidence to overcome difficulties and achieve results!

    In my spare time, I check and fill in the gaps for junior students, so that the knowledge can be filled in and filled, and I can walk with my classmates quickly! For individual outstanding students, we also give light nutrition to eat small stoves! What do you listen to?

    Broaden your knowledge! As a result, all of his students were admitted to Tsinghua University, and none of the students fell behind, and the worst was also admitted to the junior college! These facts fully prove that teachers are mainly responsible for students' poor learning!

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Whether the quality of students' learning is high or not depends mainly on whether the teacher teaches well.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Educational methods and methods: guided education, teaching students according to their aptitude. It should not be a scripted textbook and a forced indoctrination of culture.

    Teacher morality: impatient, only concerned and cared for the so-called obedient and good academic performance. Labeling indiscriminately, thinking that mud doesn't make it up to the wall. Elm wood cannot be carved.

    In terms of teachers: artificial class, good grades are divided into a class, and short teaching qualifications or interns are arranged to teach. No attention is paid to its development.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Rotten wood cannot be carved. I hope it can help you, if you like it, you can adopt it, thank you!

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    1. Define the debate topic, and it is recommended to argue from the perspective of inclusion rather than equality (the person who gets the scholarship does not necessarily mean that he is capable, but only contains), which is conducive to you attacking the other party, and the other party is not conducive to attacking you. This thesis is not good, there are many loopholes, as long as the opponent is not seriously wrong and the on-site performance is not weak, it will definitely win.

    Second, you first list the conditions for your school to evaluate the scholarship, and then find an argument for each condition. The conditions of the scholarship are nothing more than good grades or poor families, and each keyword and clause is defined and explained, and the ability is distinguished as much as possible, or even opposed.

    3. Define and classify the capabilities. At the same time, it shows that the key conditions and abilities of the scholarship evaluation are not linked.

    Fourth, if you argue, such as Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and others, they are not excellent people with both character and learning, and outstanding people from all walks of life in society are not all people who get scholarships. You can just search for celebrities and their biographies.

    That's it, the stage of mutual attack between the two sides is the most exciting! I miss the debate tournament in college, hehe!

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    From the perspective of ability, the evaluation of scholarships is usually based on test scores, which can only reflect the mastery of a student's learning in a semester. And ability is multifaceted, and this is a loophole in China's education model.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    First of all, what does it mean for students to be highly capable? its concept. Receiving a scholarship refers to grades. The two are not the same.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    The debate itself is problematic, the views of the pros and cons are all questionable, the argument is the argument, and if you question it yourself, you will be in trouble!

    It should be: Positive: High school teachers should take care of students above the level of excitement; Opposite: High school teachers should take care of students below the level.

    After all, a debate is a debate, so I personally think that the opposite side should prevail only on the topic of debate, in addition to making people a person, another purpose of education itself is to teach a person skills, so that the weak become strong, regardless of reason, below the level, should be taken care of, in this case, why should we consider taking care of the students above the level? In addition, the positive side may also argue from a class or a grade, a school's admission rate, take care of the students above the level, and ensure the promotion rate, which is inevitable! However, as I said, this is just a debate, then the opposite side should start from the aspect of ethics and morality, the teacher is a teacher, should not pay attention to the grades (although the reality is very indifferent), should pay attention to the weak, respect the weak, treat every student equally, if a person's grades are not good, but also should give spiritual care, anyone has the possibility of success, these people search for a lot of examples, all of them are celebrities (search for yourself, I point to the end, The debate itself is also a training for the team members to gather information)!

    And so on and so forth......I don't know which side you are talking about, so I'm going to say this in general terms! But if you can participate, that's enough! The key is not only to know what you want to say, but also to try to find the weaknesses of your own arguments, and then break them one by one, and then consider the possible arguments of others, analyze them thoroughly, the so-called:

    Know yourself and know your opponent, and you will not be defeated in a hundred battles!

    A few words, I hope it helps you!

Related questions
3 answers2024-04-19

Never giving up is a belief.

When the flowers are gone, there will be a time for them to bloom again, and when the sun will set and rise again, but when people's faith has collapsed, there will be no time to rebuild. Once you give it up, there's never a second time to have it. >>>More

2 answers2024-04-19

The point that comes to my mind:

1 Human cloning can ** many terminal and chronic diseases, including leukemia, it is not necessary to breed a complete human and then deprive the organs, human cloning represents the same technology as cloning organs. >>>More

5 answers2024-04-19

Debate competitions, also known as debate competitions, debate meetings, etc., are generally conducted in the form of multi-person teams, and the form is a competition activity in which both sides participate in the debate on a certain issue, and in essence, it is a related knowledge competition around the debate issue. The debate competition not only tests the thinking ability, reaction ability, expression ability, etc., but also tests the team's cooperation ability and comprehensive ability. >>>More

7 answers2024-04-19

A white lie is beautiful, and this lie is not deception or ill-intentioned. When we tell a small lie in moderation for the sake of the happiness and hope of others, the lie becomes understanding, respect, and tolerance, and even a sea change for the other person! It has a magical power and there is no impurity. >>>More

9 answers2024-04-19

If you limit the answer to "yes" or "no", then as long as you have a brain, you will definitely not follow your wishes. Otherwise, what else are you arguing about? For example, you ask your opponent, "Have you been released from prison?" >>>More