Legal Debate Tournament? Urgent!!! Asking for a debate question about the law?

If you limit the answer to "yes" or "no", then as long as you have a brain, you will definitely not follow your wishes. Otherwise, what else are you arguing about? For example, you ask your opponent, "Have you been released from prison?"

What do you think will happen to the other person? Don't take others for fools, as soon as this kind of stupid question comes out, you will be directly deducted points if you meet an experienced judge. Because it's a means of sophistry.

On this issue, your point of view is advantageous. Find a little more cases of conflict between love and law (there are a lot of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign countries), and then combine the background of our country to build a society under the rule of law --- make some elaborations. The commanding heights were won.

If the other party wants to break it, it is nothing more than "the law is derived from the law, and the love is derived" and the like. The key to victory or defeat lies in the positioning of "love". You should position "love" in general family affection, love, and friendship (narrow sense).

Avoid expanding "feelings" to the level of "legal principles".

Hehe, it's too hard. I think it's a good idea for me to ask, but it doesn't seem to quite match your requirements. Please smile ......

Positive (a): Does the law pursue absolute fairness or relative fairness?

Counter (b): Relatively fair.

A: We know that the law is divided into substantive fairness and procedural fairness, do you agree that procedural fairness is fairness?

B: Agreed. A: Since it is procedural fairness, relative fairness, not absolute fairness, substantive fairness, how can the law be merciful in the face of rules and procedures? Please explain it to the opposing party.

b：……

Summary. If the lease is created before the mortgage, the lease takes precedence over the mortgage. When the lease contract is first established and the lessor subsequently creates a mortgage on the leased property, the lease relationship continues to be valid, and the mortgagee may not organize the realization of the lease right.

If the mortgage is created before the leasehold, the mortgage takes precedence. If the mortgagor leases out the mortgaged property, the lease contract shall not be binding on the transferee after the mortgage is realized.

Asking for a debate question about the law?

Hello, consult a lawyer at your service.

You can argue whether the right of extinction of the mortgage has penetrating effect as a corporate legal person.

If the lease is created before the mortgage, the lease takes precedence over the mortgage. When the lease contract is first established and the lessor subsequently creates a mortgage on the leased property, the lease relationship continues to be valid, and the mortgagee may not organize the realization of the lease right. If the mortgage is created before the leasehold, the mortgage takes precedence.

If the mortgagor leases out the mortgaged property, the lease contract shall not be binding on the transferee after the mortgage is realized.

Article 205 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: This Part regulates civil relations arising from the ownership and use of things. Article 234:Where a dispute arises over the ownership or content of a real right, the interested parties may request confirmation of the right.

People often complain about the stinginess of fate because of what they lack, but they ignore the much that others have generously given us.

If you know how to cherish, you will find that you gain more and more; If you keep pursuing, you'll find that you're disgusted with the liquid going faster and faster.

If you don't bother yourself, others will never be able to bother you. Because of your own heart, you can't let go.

When we complain that life and society do not give us good luck, it is actually we who have slacked off in our lives and neglected some small things or certain links.

In fact, our face is a mirror of others, and the ice and frost that emerges on our faces are naturally indifferent on the faces of others; A bright smile appeared on our faces, and the enthusiasm in front of us was certainly the same.

Human activities are harmful to nature, such as mobile phones: they destroy personal space and privacy, and many people, especially young people and children, are at risk of vision and nerve damage.

If you want to defeat your opponents, you must emphasize the perspective of development and recognize the convenience and progress that science and technology have brought to people. For example, pacemakers, transplants, a long time ago, people had to wait for ...... to dieIt's different now. For the most part, you can only limit yourself to the "advantage" of technology.

Topic: Science and technology lead a new fashion in life.

I've always loved debating and have been the captain of the debate team, so let me share my opinion.

The argument link is four minutes, the estimated time is a bit long, the argument is a discussion, there is no interruption, there is no stop, and the general preparation will read through fluently, so you can read three pieces of paper in four minutes, and I rarely see so much time for the argument, generally 2 and a half minutes or three minutes.

The second link, the opposing side asks a debate, this is very special, it needs a debate to fully understand the argument, and after asking, it will be very miserable, so that the argument will be very miserable, I feel that the whole gravity is pressing on the first argument, and he needs to express himself fluently and decently. So this link is demanding. There is nothing special about the subsequent links, and it is generally like this.

Therefore, this format is very demanding for the first debate.

I was the champion of the collegiate debate in my sophomore year, and I still love to debate.

I feel like your rules are almost precise. But I'd like to make some suggestions when it comes to timing.

In the attack and defense session, the contestants open their mouths to start the timer and close their mouths to stop, with a cumulative time of 2 minutes. Generally, the questioner is only allowed to ask, and the answerer is only allowed to answer. The question is timed, but the question is not timely. The questioner is not allowed to explain his point of view (and if he does, stop wasting time).

In the free debate session, stand up and timer, sit down and stop the timer, with a cumulative time of 5 minutes, alternate between the two sides, and one side is not allowed to be consecutive. (So if you need to ask, sit down quickly, and stand stunned to delay time).

Finally, I wish you a successful conclusion to the debate.

Isn't it similar to a college debate competition, which is good, but the requirements for the debaters on the court are relatively high. If it is not a high-level competition, it is recommended to make a simple argument, a second debate, a third debate, a free debate, and a summary of the fourth debate.

You are a debater, and your argument should be the core point of your entire team, and this is not something that someone else can replace you. As a veteran debater, give you some debating experience.

1. Excessive emotion and lack of etiquette.

2. Too nervous, the language loses its logic, and the slips of the tongue are frequent.

3. Deviating from the core debate, entangled in small points, and ignoring the main line.

The above are low-level mistakes, and the following are high-level strategic mistakes.

4. The offensive is too strong and domineering, which makes the judges resistant.

5. Just targeted each other everywhere and said that the other party had no words, but did not convince the judges and the audience. (The core task of the debate is to convince the judges).

6. The language is gorgeous enough but the logic is insufficient, and many logical errors are singled out7. The logic is too thorough, so that the audience and the judges cannot figure out your logic in a limited time8. The free debate time arrangement is unreasonable, leaving the other party a long time to refute freely9. During the debate, you only face the other party and do not face the audience and the judges.