Debate Competition, Bole Horse Hunt and Horse Hunt Bole

Examples: Jiang Ziya and Zhou Wenwang (positive example) Han Xin and Xiang Yu Xiang Liang Liu Bang (negative example).

Jiang Ziya uses a straight hook to fish by the stream, and the person who wishes to take the bait is actually looking for the person who can appreciate his talent. If it weren't for King Wen of Zhou, what could Jiang Ziya do even if he was full of talent, he was just an ordinary old man, just like Maxima in the text, he could only do ordinary work and be blind. So Jiang Ziya was waiting, looking for the Bole who could appreciate him, so he had a straight hook to fish, found a King Zhou Wen, and had the opportunity to display his talents in the future.

Han Shin's talent is believed to be needless to say. But he went to Xiang Liang (Xiang Yu's uncle) with great expectations, but he was unknown. After Xiang Liang died, Xiang Yu took power, and this time Xiang Yu asked him to be Langzhong.

Han Xin offered advice to Xiang Yu many times, but Xiang Yu refused. After Liu Bang entered Shu, Han Xin left Chu and returned to Han, and he was still unknown as a petty official who managed the warehouse. Later, Han Xin sat on the law and beheaded, and it was Han Xin's turn, and he said to Teng Gong Xiahou Ying:

Doesn't King Han plan to win the world? Why kill the strong man? Xiahou Ying said Liu Bang, but Liu Bang still ignored it.

In the end, thanks to Xiao He, otherwise Han Xin would have been buried like this. Han Xin repeatedly looked for Bole who could appreciate him, and finally met him, which made Han Xin in the future.

You have an absolute advantage, don't ask, everything is inflation now, supply exceeds demand, and advertising is overwhelming.

First find the gap in the refutation from what the other party said, "there must be a thousand miles of horses to become Bole in search of thousands of horses" This sentence itself is wrong, horses are livestock and cannot express thoughts, but Bole can express thoughts. As a simple example, a good driver can drive a good car, and a person who can play basketball will know more about basketball...

Maxima matters. Hole ruler.

Maxima does not have Bole, it is also a horse, even if it goes to pull the cart, it is still a horse, and everyone will not think that it is a donkey. Everyone knows the role of the horse, and without Bole, it also has the opportunity to chase the wind and become a thousand-mile horse.

And Bole left Maxima, he is nothing, has no effect, and there will be no word Bole, Bole leaves Maxima, there is no chance to become Bole, so Bole is a product of parasitic Maxima.

Maxima's relationship with Bole:

The relationship between Maxima and Bole is one of interdependence. Maxima needs the discovery and cultivation of Bole, and Bole also needs the existence of Maxima to prove its ability and value. The relationship between Maxima and Bole also reflects the importance of talent discovery and training.

Maxima refers to talents with outstanding abilities and potential, while Bole refers to leaders and managers who can identify and nurture these talents. Only through correct exploration and cultivation can Maxima give full play to its potential and make greater contributions to the organization and society. <>

Maxima doesn't necessarily need Bole.

Everything is relative, and without Bole you probably wouldn't have discovered Maxima. However, if there is no Maxima**, do you still need Bole?

It's gold, and it's always shining.

In today's society, many "Maxima" are formed by their own efforts in the later period.

Like the first person in Chinese English, Li Yang. In his college career, basically all subjects were hung with red lights, and no one found out that he had anything outstanding in any aspect, and was even scolded and looked down upon by the teacher.

However, for the sake of his own dignity, he desperately began to learn English, went to the rooftop every morning to read words and texts aloud, and constantly listened to British and American news, and finally succeeded through his disdainful efforts. If it's just ** communication, no one can hear that this is English spoken by a Chinese.

In Li Yang's body, it was all the result of his own efforts, without the guidance of a master, and no one helped him find out that he had talent in this area.

As long as it is through its own disdainful efforts, Maxima can also do without Bole!

Outside: I think you can cite many, many examples of people who have just started to do nothing, or even very poor, and finally fought for heaven and earth through their own efforts! And those inventors.

For example, Marie Curie, who and her husband found radium in their own small room, did not succeed without Bole's guidance and excavation. There are many examples of this.

The answers to the questions of the benevolent and the wise are naturally different; The positions are different, the views are different, so it is certainly right to say that you need Bole, and you will naturally succeed if you don't need Bole.

Positive: There is Bole first, and only by making the best use of things can the value be reflected. If a person who is good at meticulous work is asked to carry heavy loads, he will never be able to do a good job, and how depressed he is to let a strong man do meticulous work.

If there is no Bole to excavate, just blindly let the strong man do the meticulous work, and let the ingenious person resist the heavy objects, then Maxima.

It will never be. If you want to become a Maxima, you must have the existence of Bole. So there is Bole first.

Against: There are Maxima first: Maxima is Maxima, Maxima's ability is to travel thousands of miles a day, and this ability always exists, and it does not change due to changes in the outside world.

When Maxima runs, everyone can see it, so they admire it and realize that this is Maxima. Gold is shining without a first respect, and Maxima is a Maxima. Before Bole recognized Maxima, it already existed, and it was the emergence of Maxima that created Bole.

Positive: Gold will always shine, so only the existing Maxima can have Bole to discover him, even if there is no Bole, as long as Maxima has it, there will be Zhang Le Li Le.

of the Go to discover the Celery Ridge Horse.

Opposite: As the original text says, Maxima often exists and Bole does not exist, first there is Bole, if there is no Bole, even if Maxima is everywhere, it is just like an ordinary horse, if there is no Bole, there is no concept of Maxima. So first there is Bole and then there is Maxima.

1.Although the development of a country needs a large number of "people of insight", because they can discover and cultivate talents, so that some talented people can be useful. 2.

But (the tone is strong, the conversation changes) Is it impossible to perform without Bole? No, those who have better quality conditions can fully (completely and in a heavy tone) display their talents, and strive to find, seize, and make good use of that precious opportunity! 2.

At the same time, you can also do amazing things to impress others! (The classic example can use the idiom story Blockbuster and Mao Sui self-recommendation) Maxima is more important! Bole is the one who discovers Maxima.

But how can he unearth Maxima? Is Maxima inseparable from Bole? Good wine is not afraid of deep alleys.

It's gold that always shines! The talents needed in today's world are not only able to "reach thousands of miles", but also to be good at discovering opportunities and creating opportunities.

If you want to wait for Bole. How can there be so many Bole? If because of this, Maxima can't show his talents.

How can this Maxima cope with the fierce competition in today's world? It's hard to adapt to being discovered.,It's not a real Maxima.。

Today's Bole is no longer as important as it used to be, and its importance can only be regarded as the savior of some Maxima who cannot create opportunities.

Therefore, the current Maxima can no longer wait for Bole to discover, but must take the initiative to meet the challenge and embark on a journey.

Opportunities can only be obtained in competition!

Bole or Maxima first?

Some people say that of course they are together, and the two are unrelated individuals. It's just that Bole is the one who digs up the Maxima, and even if Bole doesn't find it, it's still a Maxima.

That's right. However, you must know that a horse is called a Maxima because it is found to have the ability of a Maxima, so it can be called a Maxima; If it is not found to have the ability to be a horse, it is just an ordinary horse.

Therefore, it can be said that Maxima is an "effect" and not a "cause". It is because of Bole's sharp eyes that he turned an ordinary horse into a "thousand miles horse". By extension, before Maxima, there was Bole.

Learning, school, students, how can it be!

If you are not good at learning, you think that your own factors such as talent or hard work are not as good as others, and that the reason why you are not good at learning is because students are not a "thousand miles horse", and they blame all the responsibility on the students, and they entrust all the tasks to the students, and completely forget themselves.

In fact, how could he understand that the root cause of this result mainly lies in himself, in his low level of education, in his sense of responsibility is not strong enough, in his eyes are not sharp enough, in his "not the way to do it", and because he is not a Bole ......

First there was Bole, and then there was Maxima.

There is Bole in the world, and then there are Maxima, Maxima often has, and Bole is not often, even if there is Maxima, no one knows, it will only do nothing, but if there is no Maxima, even if there is Bole, you can't find Maxima, so the focus of the opposing side will be on the latter, and as the positive side, you must insist on the former, and focus the debate on "there is Bole that there is a Maxima, and there is no Maxima without Bole".

Hehe, it's up to you to do it, you have to read this story several times to feel the relationship between the two.

How nice it would be if there were Bole and Maxima in the world!

One, can the stars themselves control their own destiny? No, someone has to use them, for example, all the Mou girls are famous because of Zhang Yimou's enablement, Gong Li, Zhang Ziyi... There are also star girls, such as Huang Shengyi in kung fu, etc., all of whom have succeeded because of the use of famous directors to play good roles in good films.

Second, good wine is also afraid of deep alleys. Someone is a Maxima, but he doesn't know that he is a Maxima, and after several times of not being appreciated, he may sink and eventually become a mediocre person. Confidence often does not come from oneself, but from the evaluation of others, a person always says that he is a thousand miles, but no one appreciates, how long do you think his self-confidence can be maintained, and what is the use of his self-confidence in successful people?

Therefore, the ancients said that Maxima often exists and Bole does not often have, so our society is not lacking Maxima, but lacking Bole with discerning eyes, and it is precisely because of this that you will find that there are many art colleges with crowds of admissions sites, because many of them are Maxima, and there are only a few real examiners, that is to say, Bole is very few... First there is Bole and then there is Maxima!If there is no Bole, it is impossible for Maxima to identify it!

If there are Maxima at all!It's still an "ordinary" horse!It can be reflected from "Maxima often has, but Bole does not often have"!