Which is better, 100M shared or 2M exclusive?

Of course 100 good points to share.

There are 100 computers and 100 people.

and two TVs for two people.

I would choose the one of 100.

Because 100 people don't have people at the same time.

That's when I was able to use multiple computers.

First, the stability is different

mShared DU fiber: Shared fiber network speed.

Zhi depends on the number of people using the network, and the more people in it, the slower the speed.

m Exclusive: The network speed is constant.

Second, the advantages and disadvantages are different.

m Shared optical fiber: Different from the shared optical fiber access method of the community, if there are too many users in the community, or some of them are extremely large, it may slow down your speed.

m Dedicated: You can use the bandwidth freely to ensure speed and network quality. The downside is that it's expensive.

Third, the characteristics are different.

M Shared optical fiber: a more common broadband access method, network operators usually use optical fiber access, that is, FTTx+LAN, to provide shared bandwidth for the whole building or community.

In the use of bandwidth, even if it is 10M exclusive, it is more reliable than 100M sharing in terms of speed and stability, and the domestic telecom broadband version.

Because of the monopoly nature of rights, all ** is high, and foreign countries are open markets, so there is no such high price as in China.

Our server-side network connection usually shows a connection speed of 100m, which doesn't really make much sense, and here it shows the speed of the switch. It is said that exclusive bandwidth is expensive, but to what extent is it expensive, and why are there such big differences between different service providers and the ** provided. Take the 100m exclusive ** of domestic telecom as an example, up to 20w or more a month!

Don't doubt it, and it's calculated on a monthly basis, this kind of 100M exclusive bandwidth in the real sense is directly connected from the core switch in the computer room, and is completely unaffected by other factors, no matter whether you run the 100M or not, it is only on standby for you, ready to go.

There is a big difference, for example, the same source road.

Enjoy is to walk bai100 people at the same time. du

Exclusive means that you go alone, so there is no speed in it.

DAO has obstacles, the bandwidth is always 10M, and the sharing of 100M is equivalent to 100 people walking on the same road, the bandwidth will be small, and the network speed will be slow.

1. The upload rate is not the same.

2. Sharing, as the name suggests, everyone uses it together.

3. Exclusive ownership is personal ownership.

100m shared fiber copy.

Differences with 10M Dedicated Fiber:

The cost is different, 100M shared optical fiber is more expensive than 10M exclusive optical fiber.

The equipment is different. Not only are the layers of DAO different, but the stability and throughput of the devices themselves are also very different. Dedicated 10m fiber is usually trustworthy.

The network stability is different, with 100 Mbit/s shared fiber being unstable and 10 Mbit/s exclusive fiber being stable.

The main reasons are:

1. The exclusive and shared schemes are different. Exclusive sharing can achieve a 1:1 ratio within the metropolitan area network, and there will be a coefficient for sharing. (Second-tier operators usually do not have a fixed coefficient, and the bandwidth will never be expanded if the traffic is not satisfied).

2. The level of exclusive devices is higher than that of shared devices. In the tree structure of a metro network, the level of dedicated devices is always higher than that of shared devices. For each higher level and each reduced hop, the stability is increasing in progression, and the failure rate is also increasing in progression.

3. The failure rate of shared 100m optical fiber is high, and some users will experience high latency and packet loss.

100m sharing means that this 100m is used with others, see how many people are used together, and 10 exclusive is used by this line itself.

One, literal understanding:

Sharing, that is, multiple people working together.

Home fiber is exclusive, that is, used alone, only.

There is a room for others to use.

Second, the difference between sharing and exclusivity.

The exclusive one is definitely more expensive. Shared ones are relatively cheaper.

In terms of bandwidth, the shared in-Internet summit card, which everyone uses, makes the total bandwidth smaller.

The shared data transmission is prone to vulnerabilities, interception by others, or the spread of viruses.

If 100m is shared, if the copy is not restricted, whoever has good equipment performance will grab more, and whoever has bad equipment performance will grab less. In extreme cases, 100w is all robbed by one person, and the rest of the people can't grab it at all. It shows that some people's Internet is extremely fast, and some people can't access the Internet at all.

It would be a different matter if it were to be restricted.

If you have 10m exclusively, no one will rob you of it. You can use up to 10m, you don't need it, and the 10m is also put there for nothing.

If you are confident that your equipment is powerful enough, you can use 100M to share, and you may grab far more than 10M. If your equipment is not good, just use the exclusive 10m, and there is no grabbing with you.

zhi1m per second, not affected by others; dao

The 100m shared optical fiber depends on the special width used at that time.

Sharing, that is, multiple people working together. Home fiber is generally exclusive and only for one's own use.

In terms of bandwidth, the shared peak card for surfing the Internet,

If the host rents BAI, it is preferred to enjoy 10M exclusively.

DU 100 Gigabit shared optical fiber.

A 10-metre-wide road that you can walk on your own is exclusive.

A 100-meter-wide road The operator arranges for a lot of people to walk That's what it means (a good operator will arrange the right people to go with you, and some small operators will arrange a large number of people to walk with you in order to save costs, resulting in you having no way out.) ）

This depends on the money, and when the money is in place, it is exclusive, like more than 1,000 yuan 100m, it must be shared.

Usually not a private line, the kind in the community, generally several companies share a switch together, and the switch is definitely not exclusive.

IP is not important, in the application, it is the bandwidth that matters. It seems that you don't have a house number at home, and you write *** road ** next door, and you can still receive things. This is known as an IP address.

Independent bandwidth, like you live in a single room, 50 square meters, and others live in a collective dormitory, 500 square meters, which one do you want to live in, it must be 50 square meters.

Therefore, exclusive 5M is definitely better than shared 100M.

There is another possibility, because you have not explained whether 5M is enough for you to use your specific business application. In addition, this 100m of sharing, how much has been used so far, how much is free, you didn't say.

If your business has a bandwidth usage that fluctuates more or less during the day, or less during the day, it may be 6 trillion during the day and 2 trillion at night. Then you may use the appropriate one to share. Also, if you share 100m, and there is no one in the 100m at present, you will occupy it alone, and new customers may come in and occupy it again in the future, then you will also make money in vain.

For example, if you rent a single room, but the house is a three-bedroom house, and there are only you in it, and there are still 2 rooms that have not been rented out, you are equivalent to living in a three-bedroom apartment alone.

I helped you with the question, but your question was too broad and too unspecific.

Standalone IPs are relatively safer than shared IPs. Shared IPs may be blocked due to the influence of other IPs under the same IP. Therefore, if you don't have any special needs for broadband, it is recommended to choose a dedicated IP

The bigger the better, even if it is shared, the suddenness of network data transmission is very obvious, unless everyone uses the service that occupies a high bandwidth at the same time, it is very helpless to enjoy 5M exclusively when you want to next a large file.

It depends on how many people share, 100m is shared by ten people, and each person is 10m, and 2 people are 50m. It is recommended to use 20M dedicated broadband, because the shared one will be congested during the peak bandwidth, which is the card. Exclusive ones have separate bandwidth protection.

There are certain conditions for comparing the bandwidth of these two types of bandwidth together.

1. If the Internet café basically occupies the bandwidth, simply compare the bandwidth of the home equipment, of course, the 100m Internet café is much faster.

2. If there are more people using the Internet café, there are more applications that basically play games and occupy high bandwidth, so sometimes it will feel that it is not as fast as 20m broadband for one person.

3. From a technical point of view, most of the Internet cafes use IP dedicated lines, which are fiber optic cables from the convergence switch in the computer room to the Internet café, which is different from the PON technology used by ordinary families; PON technology uses an optical port to go through multi-level light splitting, and there will be a delay in the middle (although it is negligible), but because the device passes through more paths than IP private lines, the same bandwidth of 100M is also an IP private line (here refers to Internet cafes) is faster and more stable.

20m exclusive, 100m shared by more people, it must be slow.

It depends on how many people share it, if 1000 people share 100M bandwidth, then no one can only get the bandwidth, which is definitely not as fast as 1M exclusive. Moreover, if it is a shared broadband, many people will use software to grab bandwidth, resulting in serious uneven bandwidth distribution, and there will be many user cards that cannot even open web pages.

There is another question, the bus 100m is not a stable 100m, for this shared type of 100m, it is likely that only in the middle of the night or in the daytime can reach the bandwidth of 100m, in the peak period of the Internet at night, it is good to reach the bandwidth of 10m, at this time, let many users share the nominal 100m, open the web page is very stuck, many users directly disconnect.

Therefore, it is difficult to judge which fast in one sentence, it depends on the specific situation. If 100M really has 100M bandwidth, the number of shared users is less than 100, and no one uses BT or other bandwidth-occupying software, which is faster than 1M exclusive; Otherwise, it is slower than 1M dedicated broadband.

For example, exclusive 1 trillion, exclusive 10 trillion, and exclusive 100 trillion means that your server can exclusively enjoy this bandwidth and will not be interfered by other people's servers, which is more expensive; Customers in the large and medium-sized server hosting business have higher requirements for bandwidth, and the content and nature of the company determine that only the use of independent bandwidth resources can meet the needs of quality, and this kind of bandwidth resources that are only used by individual customers are called exclusive bandwidth. The charging method of exclusive bandwidth is different from that of shared bandwidth, which is a combination of two types, the first is the rack space occupied by the server, and the second is the exclusive bandwidth fee, which is divided into computer bit fees and bandwidth fees. If you use dedicated bandwidth, you are charged based on the maximum value of the dedicated bandwidth, not the actual usage of the customer.

For example, if a customer packages a rack and adds 100M of exclusive bandwidth, even if only one server is placed in the rack of the customer's package, and the server only uses 1M of bandwidth, the customer must still pay the full amount of the rack seat fee and the bandwidth fee of 100M exclusive bandwidth.