Which is better Call of Duty or Battlefield Kings?

Call of Duty outperforms Battlefield Kings in every way.

It doesn't matter if it's online or standalone.

Call of Duty servers are mostly abroad, and the ping often fluctuates between 200-300.

However, some Chinese people set up Call of Duty servers, but it is still very troublesome.

A stand-alone machine, an online game, compared to what?

Go without saying! Players who have played Mission 6 and those who have played King of the Battlefield will know it at a glance! Battlefield Kings plagiarized Mission 6 in some ways!

Call of Duty is a super popular game published in the United States with high quality and high quality! The gap between them is at least 100 years!

Not a level. Turnip and cabbage have their own loves, but there are more people who gnaw on the call of duty turnip.

Call of Duty is a must, and the only one that can tie with Call of Duty is Battlefield (Battlefield Kings have nothing to do with Battlefield).

Call of Duty, the two can't be compared!

There is no comparison. Stick's second-rate online game and Sam's first-class stand-alone.

I personally feel that Call of Duty is good, and I have played all the Duty series, all of which are very good.

The number one in the world has always been Call of Duty.

Don't even think about it, absolute cod

Is your mom pretty or your dad handsome? (For example, bear with me.)

It can only be said that COD sales are large. These two are not the same idea, how to compare horizontally?

There are 9 games in the Call of Duty series, which are: Call of Duty, Call of Duty 2, Call of Duty 3, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, Call of Duty:

World at War, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, Call of Duty: Black Ops, Call of Duty:

Modern Warfare 3, Call of Duty: Black Ops 2

There are 14 games in the Battlefield series, namely: "Battlefield: play4free", "Battlefield:".

Heroes, Battlefield 2: Modern Warfare, Battlefield: Hardfight, Battlefield 4, Battlefield 1943, Battlefield 2142, Battlefield:

Vietnam, "Battlefield 3", "Battlefield 1942", "Battlefield: Bad Company", "Battlefield: Bad Company 2", "Battlefield 1", "Battlefield 2".

Each has its own style.

All kinds of vehicles in the Battlefield series can be opened, and the battlefield from the sky to the underground sea is large-scale, more like actual combat.

Call of Duty has a rich plot and is more like experiencing a "World War II blockbuster", which can only be used specifically with equipment set in the game.

Operationally speaking, the Battlefield series aims by pressing the right button, which is very unaccustomed, and Call of Duty is more concise to operate.

Don't talk about the plot, cod wins (buy genuine version is not recommended, no Chinese), the battlefield plot is really not good, the highlight is the picture and real ballistic design (to put it bluntly, the focus is on the genuine online, with Chinese traditional), buy the genuine version of the battlefield (battle 3 is not d version online, war 4 will not have, cod10 is no Chinese, the second is that the d version should be online, there is no need to spend money if you can wait).

What the hell is Battlefield Three? It's all on Battlefield 1, and I'm still talking about BF3. Piracy in the battlefield is novice training, and genuine online is the essence.

COD Single Player Plot Good It's mediocre, 13 is better than 12, and overall after 11 is playing online.

Seeing that netizens are complaining that the plot of the Battlefield series is not as good as Call of Duty, I personally think this is indeed the case, but after all, the two series of plots have different focuses. The main members of Unit 141 believe that most people can report their names as long as they see the shape of their personality, and the plot process is over, just like watching a whole season of war dramas, and they will sigh for the sacrifice of the main characters. As for the battlefield, the plot flow of the battlefield is shorter than the mission, but it is more like war, compared to the call of duty "two people take out the enemy and a base", you can see the division of labor of the team in the battlefield plot, and the performance in the ** feel and hit reaction is also more realistic.

That is, Call of Duty is "Hello, Legendary Warrior" and Battlefield is "Welcome to the Battlefield". In addition, when it comes to multiplayer mode, Call of Duty is a squad battle, and the outstanding performance of an individual greatly affects victory or defeat. The battlefield is a large-scale battle, and each class has different responsibilities, and success or failure depends on how much each person contributes to the team.

Call of Duty has a strong sense of substitution, especially in the plot. The battlefield is mainly a player confrontation, and the only single player plot that is better is the herald of battlefield one (Old Man Xia).

The Call of Duty story is good, the Battlefield multiplayer is good, and I personally prefer Battlefield because he is the only game that brings me the atmosphere of the battlefield, especially the Verdun map of Battlefield 1.

Saying that Call of Duty is mainly a stand-alone player who is afraid that he will die of laughter when he hears it by genuine Call of Duty players, and spend money to buy a movie? These 2 games are now online-oriented, and on console platforms have never been online-oriented, otherwise Microsoft's backward compatibility with the previous generation of Call of Duty is why, how can Modern Warfare 2 be ranked No. 2 in September '18 after backward compatibility at the end of August '18?

I firmly believe that the "Battlefield" series, whether it is "Battlefield 2", "Battlefield 3", "Battlefield 4", and "Battlefield 1", are all better works than the "Call of Duty" series, because the latter can give me a deeper, more shocking, and even a sense of combat, or a sense of substitution, which can be because of the joy of victory, the humiliation of defeating, or the refreshment of extraordinary performance.

I think the single-player plot of the "Battlefield" series is underrated, first of all, whether it is "Battlefield 3" or "Battlefield 4", in fact, the story itself cannot be said to be mediocre, especially the former, the campaign design is actually worth experiencing, but these are not important, the important thing is the multiplayer design, "Battlefield" is really excellent, this comparison, you will feel that "Call of Duty" is just a simple way to pass the time, and "Battlefield" is a real battle.

The big scene is the battlefield. The disadvantage is that there are more immortals on the PC side.

The cod15 system can't be opened after the update, and the 16 internal test can't be opened, so I didn't buy it, and I don't know why.

I remember that in 2011, Mission 8 and Battlefield 3 were listed at the same time, and the world of difference in the picture was reflected, the outdated game engine of the mission could only rely on art design to barely compete with it, speaking of which, the Battlefield series has always had a drawback, that is, in terms of small object settings, although the mission engine is less expressive, but it is very careful in the details of the scene, and the scene gives players a strong sense of substitution through some small details, and the battlefield is worse in terms of scene details.

Battlefield 1, 32vs32 To be honest, this kind of multiplayer battle felt too shocking at the time, planes, tanks, trains, stormtroopers, support, and medics.

Let's say it, in every work of the Call of Duty series, players have a feeling of being in it, just like watching a movie, making people feel the cruelty of war, the life and death between comrades-in-arms, and the courage to go to the battlefield with a mission, the plot is really exciting! The main focus of the Battlefield series is multiplayer online competition, and if you haven't experienced the online confrontation of Battlefield, then it can be said to be a pity.

The picture of the mission is gorgeous.,It's a pure FSP.,Basically every generation has been played.,Except for the last generation, there is no end to the plot.。 Battlefield, how to say it, the plot is very good, the picture is a little worse than the mission, but it will not be much worse. Battlefield has played customs clearance in the past dynasties, and it feels very good, especially Battlefield 4 (although a little sorry for the PLA).

It's sold after playing Battlefield 1 for a while.,The vehicle of the fps game turned out to be a role-playing third-person perspective.,Vomit,Maga! How can it be? Aren't all Battlefield series pure fps?

Did I buy the wrong one or did I have a problem with the game? Sell it at a loss.,I like the mission of pure fps but there's no plot.,I like the battlefield with a good plot is not pure.,It's worse than before.,It's just that the battlefield is worse than ever! To put it bluntly, there is no worst, only worse!

Call of Duty Single, Battlefield Online Call of Duty Small Battles Street Battles Encounters Battlefield is a big campaign.

Play the single-player story on Call of Duty, play multiplayer online on the battlefield, Call of Duty 15 has never been played.

To put it simply, Call of Duty is a small-scale special ops, a large-scale clan operation, and it has a completely different feel, and they're both pretty good games.

If you're just a fan of FPS first-person shooters, Call of Duty may be more suitable, but if you're a bit of a military fan, it may be difficult to decide which one is better, because it's full of secondary two youth. The Battlefield 3 aircraft affects the balance too much, and often a big god opens the fixed wing, and the opposite vehicle doesn't have to think about going out.

There's nothing like it, Call of Duty was the first plot FPS I came into contact with. Is the plot mediocre? No, until now, I still shed tears when I see the death of Xiaoqiang's ghost and soap.

So is the plot shocking? It's not there yet; The battlefield was only contacted a few years ago (the computer can bring it up),The battlefield is mainly multiplayer-based.,The plot is also a novice tutorial interspersed with the story of the protagonist.,The plot is not outstanding.,And almost every generation after four generations is infiltrated.。 But is the plot really useless?

To be clear, no. The scene of a generation of British and German infantry meeting and putting down ** is really shocking, and the dog tag also gave me a Christmas truce (of course, this is a multi-person). If you like street fighting or skirmishes, I recommend Call of Duty; If you like to be massive and unpredictable on the battlefield, then I recommend Battlefield.

Have you ever played the COD series and the Battlefield series?