-
If you want to talk about playability, it is still Sony's SLR fun, sweeping the panorama, in-camera HDR, handheld night scene, these fun functions Nikon Canon does not have. Of course, the powdered wires said: We don't need this. No way, hehe.
Off topic. The A560 and A33 use the same CMOS sensor, the difference is that the reflector is movable and immovable.
The A560 focuses on still painting, without 30% light loss, the A560's imaging quality and shooting parameters are much better than the A33.
The A33 focuses on animation photography, and the A33 and A55 can be compared to a camera crammed into a DSLR, at the cost of the image quality of still pictures and the reduction of shooting parameters.
Because you're struggling with value for money, you shouldn't be the type of person who is particularly rich, hehe, I guess.
In this case, it is impossible for you to choose a high-end Zeiss head for your lens, so the image quality loss caused by translucency is still considerable. Since you don't have high requirements for **, it's better to choose A560.
Because A560**Although it is more expensive than A33, you must know that playing SLR, the investment in the body can only be pediatric compared to the lens, hehe. There is no need to choose a body that you are not very satisfied with for the price difference of a few hundred dollars.
Then the lens, Sony's APS-C king lens Carl Zeiss DT1680 with A560 or A580, is the first choice for entry-level high-end cameras.
Although it is a bit expensive, buy it with all your heart.
Two years ago, I thought 1680ZA was very expensive.,Tangled for more than half a month.,Bought DT16105.,Now I'm the one who regrets it.。。。
The above is my own suggestion, because of the personal prejudice of how many people are not the same evaluation, the landlord himself discretion.
-
Canon is advertising, Nikon is a camera, Sony is learning to be a camera! It is recommended to buy a camera to buy Nikon, and I use a Nikon SLR.
-
Both the A306 and A507 of Sopesani are the type mega source of digital cameras, and the main differences are in the following aspects:1Photoreceptor with guess piece:
The A507 uses a larger sensor than the A306, resulting in better low-light performance and a higher pixel count. 2.Operational Experience:
The A507 features more advanced fast autofocus technology to enhance the shooting experience. 3.Dimensions & Weight:
The A507 is smaller and lighter than the A306, making it easier to carry. 4.Video recording function:
The A507 has more advanced recording capabilities. To sum up, the A507's upgrade over the A306 is based on the number of pixels, low-light performance, and shooting experience, which may be a better choice if these aspects are more important to you.
-
Answer: Dear! Have you found Sony A306 vs A507?
Sony A306 and A507 are both digital cameras launched by Sony, and their main differences are as follows:1Sensors:
The A306 uses a 10-megapixel CCD sensor, while the A507 uses a 12-megapixel CCD sensor, so the A507 has higher pixels and can shoot sharper**. 2.Screen:
The screen size of the A306 is inches and the resolution is 230,000 pixels, while the screen size of the A507 is inches and the resolution is 230,000 pixels, so the screen of the A507 is larger and more suitable for **** and operating the camera. 3.Operation:
The A507 has a more stylish appearance and is made of metal, which feels better and is more durable. To sum up, compared to the A306, the A507 has improved in terms of pixels, screen, operation and appearance, so it is more convenient and efficient when shooting**. However, the A507 is also relatively higher.
Kiss! I hope my answer helps! <>
-
1. A55 pixels are 16.2 million, which is 2 million higher than A33; The A55 is 10 fps for continuous shooting, and the A33 is 7 fps for continuous shooting.
2. Sony's two machines are single-electric, and there is no reflector action when taking pictures, so the continuous shooting is very fast, and the 1.44 million EVF framing is used instead of the optical framing of the SLR; The K-X is a DSLR camera, the A55 A33 and the K-X are not a grade thing, there is no comparison! No matter from the perspective of continuous shooting and LCD, A55 A33 is much stronger, and K-X is about to be eliminated, and K-R is about to be launched!
To tell you the truth, I really think it's funny to read the answer of this guy who says others are ignorant, you think others are ignorant, then look at your answer, people want KX and Sony A33 A55 comparison, what are you doing with KX-KR comparison? KX and A33 A55 are different systems, so there is no comparison, but the sensor is the same size, since the main hardware is the same, of course, compared to other aspects such as LCD, LZ If you really take a DC and KX ratio, then of course it is another comparison! Finally, you came to me to chew on the elimination, you said that you are not ready to buy a machine if you don't have a camera, do you want to buy the latest generation or the previous generation?
I think most people will choose the latest one, but if you already have KX and KR comes out at this time, then of course there is no need to buy KR! According to what you said, LZ doesn't even need to think about SLR, you can make a good film if you buy a DC, or even get a second-hand film machine?
There's no way, ignorant people are ignorant people in their eyes, 1.44 million evf is written as 144evf, and I don't bother to say other messy copies! I can only express my admiration to you!
Even if I really can't understand your logic, do you understand what I said, if you don't understand it, take a look at it, I said that you go back to the west, according to your logic manufacturers, don't upgrade, LCD and the like? Some guys come up and criticize others, copy randomly, and ask you to see the information, there are many on the Internet, Lao Tzu is just playing casually, and he is not a master, and others have questions to say a few words casually, but at least the logical thinking is correct, and the language level can be understood. You are the master, you slowly master go!
But I've never seen a master say that he's attacking others as soon as he comes up and is ignorant! Even if you don't seem to have an enmity with someone, I really don't know who is ignorant, the cultural level is not ordinarily strong!
Too lazy to say that the more you talk, the more disgusting it becomes! I wish you a master who is getting taller and taller!
-
A390 is just an A350 with a different shell, and compared with A350, it is only a little bit better than high ISO, and ISO 800 is free to use.
There is no other place where the A390 is better than the A450, at most it is the screen that can be flipped.
Shiming cracks to tell you,A390 is Sony's product in order to consume the inventory CCD,Oh,The 14 million pixel CCD is used up,A390 will be delisted。
The A550 is the entry-level SLR with the closest performance to a mid-range machine. Compared to the Canon 500D, it is better than the 500D in all aspects except for the lack of video capability, and it also has an in-body stabilization function.
Compared with the mid-range A700, except for the handling, the brightness of the viewfinder and the durability of the body, it is not inferior to the A700 in other aspects, or even surpasses.
Sony's DSLR's popular lens source is not as easy to match as Canon's, and the mid-to-high-end head is relatively expensive, at least for now.
-
Nikon D5000 is better, Sony's is not dropped, and it is prone to data loss.
-
Let's go with a full manual telephoto! Cheaper within 2500. There's no need to change heads.
Fujifilm HS11, Canon SX30 IS, Panasonic FZ40 (2400).
Regardless of weight, the Fujifilm S205EXR (2200) is fine.
The replacement is too fast, and they are all consumer models. After practicing, buy a DSLR.
-
Canon 550D is good! But it's also the most expensive! I also use 550d18-135mm, the camera is this thing, what grade to choose, it mainly depends on your personal requirements, there is no standard!
-
The Sony A33 A55 and Canon 550D are not cameras of the same kind.
It is recommended to go on 550d
Recommend Sony's WX1
Sony WX1 has the strongest technology in the small DC at this stage, which is manifested in the function, the camera has many unique features such as handheld night scenes, rear projection sensors, etc. And in terms of ease of use, the WX1 also inherits the consistent advantages of Sony DC. Therefore, if you are a consumer who has certain requirements for camera function and image quality, but does not want to add too much travel burden to taking photos, Jumei's photography equipment network believes that Sony WX1 is a good choice. >>>More
It seems that the landlord has not yet figured out what his life needs are - which side to focus on internally and externally? So wait and see what happens.
Sony, right? There are a lot of quality problems with Samsung! There are a lot of Samsung machines in the repair shop....
I was going to buy a Sony T20 for the holidays.
But both of my classmates told me that Sony couldn't afford to let me buy a Canon >>>More
Hungry... In the eyes of Japanese manufacturers, functions cannot be added indiscriminately... Because the Japanese habit is "what should be used for something, you should not add some fancy and unsuitable things to it", I want to add *** functions to digital cameras... Japanese manufacturer thinks it's a ··· At the beginning, there was no company to do this, and then it was because in order to expand the market (like the Chinese just think that I have more than one function to strengthen you a lot of "cost performance") to add it (in fact, the number is still not much), but to the single-lens reflex professional level of digital products, because the people who can afford it are rich or professional people, for Sony such a "newcomer", adding functions indiscriminately will make some potential professional customers think that they are messing around, which will be very troublesome... Therefore, it is normal to show your "professional ethics" for SLR cameras, and disdain to add photography functions to the camera to attract the attention of some professional consumers >>>More