Why should Japan thank the Chinese Navy?

Because the Chinese Navy has helped Japan a lot, he wants to thank our Chinese Navy.

Because the Chinese Navy guarantees the security of some parts of Japan, so it will be.

Because the Chinese Navy has saved Japan many times, it must be thanks to the Chinese Navy.

Because the Chinese Navy helped Japan solve some problems, it will be grateful to the Chinese Navy.

During its visit to Japan, the Chinese Navy expressed its condolences to the victims of Typhoon Hagibis.

Because the Chinese Navy helped them a lot at sea.

Because the Chinese Navy has some help to the Japanese, that's why it's like this.

I think it was the Chinese Navy that helped them, so he thanked them.

We don't protect them for much time, so to thank us.

This is because the Chinese Navy has made a lot of contributions to the stability of Japan.

Japan's combined fleet can be said to be the world's top three navies, since the 80s of the last century, Japan's impact on the country (household appliances, electromechanical) has made Japan the object of worship of many people, at the beginning of this century (before 2010) Japan does have a relatively strong horizontal sea and air strength, so to a large extent, this kind of inertial thinking has greatly raised the strength of the Sea of Japan in the hearts of people.

In all fairness, now (2015) the comprehensive strength of the Sea of Japan is actually not in the top five, although it has a very strong aviation anti-submarine and the world's top three destroyer formations, but Japan is extremely lacking in offensive **, and the reality of no capital ships makes the strength of the Sea of Japan should not be overestimated.

A naval power cannot be created only by relying on advanced forces, it must accumulate considerable experience in maritime operations and ocean-going supply, and only those with ocean-going combat capabilities can be regarded as a maritime power.

Now let's count the countries that have had experience in ocean naval warfare with our fingers (not to mention in ancient times, those experiences have not been passed down to the present, since modern times) It seems that Britain, the United States, Japan, and Germany, then count what are the real naval powers, Britain counts one, the United States counts one, Russia (inherited the former Soviet Union) will count it as one (the Soviet Union still confronted the United States several times at sea before, and almost did it) The German navy never left the port in World War I, The same surface ships in World War II couldn't get out, so the submarines went out, so I have reservations about the combat effectiveness of the German sea ** boats, Japan still worked with the United States in the Pacific Ocean for several years in World War II, and almost wiped out the US Pacific Fleet at once (sneak attack on Pearl Harbor), this is of course a naval power.

A naval power must have the capability of ocean-going naval warfare, and China cannot be regarded as a naval power if it has aircraft carriers, so another significance of escorting ships in Somalia now is to accumulate experience in ocean-going replenishment.

**It's just a kind of equipment, the key is to look at the people, anyway, even if the Indian Navy has an aircraft carrier, so far it has only fought pirates, if you really encounter an experienced navy, the equipment will not win, but the inexperienced side is likely to follow the textbook step by step.

First of all, according to what you said, only with **, submarines, and aircraft carriers can it become a naval power, although Japan does not have an aircraft carrier in name, but the Osumi, Shimokita, including the newly launched one (that is, the super-large frigate), is no different from an aircraft carrier, and it can be used as an aircraft carrier with a little modification.

Although India has aircraft carriers, those aircraft carriers are basically unable to form combat effectiveness. An aircraft carrier formation needs the cooperation of frigates, cruisers, destroyers, submarines, and so on, and a single aircraft carrier cannot do anything.

Secondly, the pure ** fleet encountering the aircraft carrier fleet does not necessarily mean that the entire army is annihilated, not to mention, India cannot build a qualified aircraft carrier fleet.

Third, in modern warfare, the Japanese Navy far surpassed the Indian Navy in combat experience, as evidenced by the Pacific War in World War II, when the Japanese Navy was able to compete with the U.S. Navy. And the Indian Navy has little experience.

Finally, I am not biased against Japan, but if the Japanese Navy fights with the Indian Navy, India will lose a lot.

Whether it is a naval power or not is not only the content and scale of the first equipment, but also its comprehensive combat capability. For example, there is not much difference in tonnage between a cruiser and a several search and destroyers, but there is a difference in combat power. A combat ship should not only look at how advanced it is carried, but also look at its self-sufficiency, endurance, survivability, etc.

At present, Japan's 88 Fleet should have strong combat capabilities, both in terms of equipment and tactical literacy in terms of training. To say that there are many naval powers does not mean that he is a strong country, this is comparatively speaking. If you are interested, you can learn more about the problems of the 88 fleet.

I'm about the same upstairs as I want to say, I'm adding. Japan's maritime power can be said to be the first in Asia, because Japan is surrounded by seas on all sides, and he attaches great importance to the development of maritime military strength, and the world's first aircraft carrier was born in Japan. You don't have to take India seriously at all, and you don't even want to give that broken aircraft carrier to China.

The presence of aircraft carriers does not prove a country's military strength at sea, it is necessary to look at it comprehensively. India is at a standoff with China over the issue of southern Tibet.

Japan does not have an aircraft carrier because Japan estimates that it will not build it now for political reasons, there is no technical problem, India is too weak, and there is no combat power even if it has a dilapidated aircraft carrier, if India is a naval power, most countries on the planet can be a naval power. For nearly 100 years in Japan's history, it has been a powerful country in terms of naval equipment performance and combat capability.

The main reason is that our country is not as good as Japan, artillery is not as good as Japan, shells are not as good as Japan, coal is not as good as Japan, and boilers are not as good as Japan. The specific analysis is as follows:

1. The Chinese Beiyang Naval Division used bituminous coal from the Kailuan Coal Mine (and it was the worst five-trough coal), and Japan used Welsh anthracite, and the Chinese fleet was billowing with smoke, which could be seen dozens of miles away.

2. The ships of the Chinese fleet were launched earlier, which led to the overdue service of the boiler (the household department did not allocate funds to replace the boiler), resulting in the speed of our fleet being much lower than that of the combined fleet.

3. The Chinese artillery shells used black powder, and the combined fleet used Shimose gunpowder, so the power of our artillery shells was much lower than that of the other side. In addition, Shimose gunpowder can also cause fire on our ships.

4. The ships of the Chinese fleet were launched earlier, so the large-caliber naval guns were all forward, and they could only use the formation of two ships of the same type and the bow of the ship against the enemy, which led to the inflexibility of the Japanese fleet.

5. The Chinese artillery uses a rack retreat gun, and the combined fleet uses a tube retreat gun (rapid-fire gun), so our side can fire one cannon, and the enemy can fire ten cannons.

6. Our army has insufficient flowering shells, and can only use a large number of armor-piercing shells, resulting in insufficient strength.

7. The household department refused to purchase German flowering shells, and the shells made by the Tianjin Machinery Manufacturing Bureau were not powerful enough, and most of them were armor-piercing shells.

8. Ding Junmen was wounded when the battle began, the signal flag was broken, and he was unable to command the battle.

9. Deng Guandao did not listen to the command and did not push the ship's torpedo into the water according to the requirements of Admiral Ding, resulting in the torpedo on the Zhiyuan ship being destroyed and detonated by Japanese artillery, and the Zhiyuan ship sank. (In 1894, torpedoes were basically useless in naval battles, and could only hit stationary targets in harbors).

10. The square pipe belt escaped, causing the formation to be disrupted.

11. Our rapid-fire guns were 0 (some say 3), while the Japanese fleet had 97 rapid-fire guns. Beiyang reported early on to buy rapid-fire guns, but there was no news, so they could only use the old-fashioned rack guns.

12. The largest tonnage of our fleet is 7,000 tons (Dingyuan), and then 2,900 tons from Yuanyuan. The lightest is only 1,000 tons (Chaoyong).

The tonnage of the Japanese Combined Fleet is very balanced, with 3,000-4,000 tons. The three warships are 4,200 tons, and the first guerrilla fleet is 3,000 tons, and the speed also exceeds that of the Beiyang Naval Division.

13. Compared with warships of more than 3,000 tons: Beiyang Naval Division (2 ships [Ding, Zhen]) and the Combined Fleet (8 ships [four ships in one tour, three ships in Sanjing, and Fusang]) can be seen in the gap.

14. Compare warships below 3,000 tons: Beiyang Naval Division (10 ships, Zhiyuan, Jingyuan, Jingyuan, Laiyuan, Jiyuan, Guangjia, Chaoyong, Yangwei, Pingyuan, Guangbing).

Combined Fleet (2 ships, Chiyoda, Hiei).

That is to say: the Beiyang Naval Division is basically a small ship, a weak ship, and does not resist attack.