Which country in Asia has the strongest navy

Today's Japanese navy has completely broken away from the traces of defeat in World War II and has become the most powerful navy in the Asia-Pacific region other than the United States, ranking first in the world in its antisubmarine and mine-sweeping combat capabilities, and also ranking first in Asia in terms of its comprehensive combat capability in the medium and far seas.

If it's a war, it's Japan, and if it's a brag, it's us.

The ranking in history is about the same, and it started to rank without playing, and it's nonsense.

The fiasco of the war - foreign media selected the world naval rankings, and the country ranked first showed ......

Now the strongest navy in the world is recognized as the United States.

There is no doubt that China and Japan are major naval powers in Asia. Japan's potential is higher than China's.

China has 1 quasi-aircraft carrier, 2 dock landing ships, 30 tank landing ships, 47 medium landing ships, 27 destroyers (16 modernized ones), 50 frigates (29 modernized ones, including 14 Jiangwei-class ships), 120 missile boats, 130 submarine hunters, 100 gunboats, 260 landing craft, 7 ship supply ships, not to mention submarines.

Japan has 2 *** aircraft carriers, 4 tank landing ships, 8 missile destroyers, 36 destroyers, 16 submarines, South Korea has 1 *** landing ship, 4 tank landing ships, 11 destroyers, 9 frigates, 14 submarines, 100 patrol ships, India has 1 aircraft carrier, 1 dock landing ship, 9 tank landing ships, 8 destroyers, 12 frigates, 24 small frigates, 29 patrol ships (5 made in Korea), 15 conventional submarines, 1 nuclear-powered submarine.

The two countries are almost the same in strength. In terms of shipbuilding capabilities, South Korea is higher than India, and South Korea also has the ability to develop nuclear power. However, South Korea is suppressed by the United States, and military ship technology cannot be developed, which is similar to Japan.

1. Japan, advanced technology, high level of training, good quality of personnel, and many others.

2. China, high quantity, good training quality, slightly poor technical equipment.

3. India, the quantity and technology are good, the quality of personnel is mediocre, and the Indians are not born warriors.

4. South Korea has a good economy, good technology, and small comprehensive national strength.

5. Nothing else is worth mentioning!

Japan, China, South Korea, India,,, Japan have equipment, technology, and well-trained personnel. China is large-scale, well-equipped, highly localized, and has better personnel training. Although South Korea is better equipped than China, it is small in size and poorly trained in personnel.

Poor personnel training may be disagreed. That's just the way it is. If the quality of their personnel is good, their combat effectiveness will be greatly enhanced.

Last year's conflict between South Korea and North Korea, you can see that the quality of South Korea is very bad, which is proof of this. India, which spends the most money and has the least effect. The most terrible thing is that the localization is the lowest, and there is no stamina.

Foreign things are not very well mastered. In addition, the logistical support of multinational equipment is very troublesome, and there is almost no way to provide support in the event of a war.

1st place: India.

2 aircraft carriers, 2 cruisers, 38 missile destroyers, 120 frigates, 63 submarines.

2nd place: Japan.

The main battleship has 8 Kongo-class, 1 cruiser, 32 missile destroyers, 110 frigates, and 53 submarines.

3rd place: South Korea.

There are 12 modern-class missile main warships, 21 missile destroyers, 160 frigates, and 86 conventional submarines.

4th place: Vietnam.

There are 10 new missile main warships, 30 destroyers, 80 frigates, and 30 conventional submarines.

5th place: China.

There are 2 new Chinese Aegis warships, 86 missile destroyers, 78 frigates, and new capital warships.

2 units, 4 nuclear submarines, 86 conventional submarines.

The assessment of naval strength is quite difficult, and it is affected by geography, coordination of other arms, logistics, ships, operational command, and training. This can only be compared by an idealized external environment (where both sides of the war are far from their homeland, in a vast area of sea with scattered islands and reefs, and no other arms of the army to support them). Conclusion:

1st place, the United States (not explained).

Clause. Second and third Russia, Great Britain (this strength is more difficult, as a long-range attack force, Russia's "Kuz" surpasses the invincible class, but in view of its more failures, and the invincible class also performs well, the advantage of Russian aircraft carriers is not obvious. Then someone said that Russia was terrible with nuclear submarines, but the British 15 attack nuclear submarines and 4 strategic nuclear submarines were equipped with Tomahawk Tridents, which, together with their traditional anti-submarine capabilities, were about the same).

Fourth, France (the powerful Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier surpasses the first two, 12 16 nuclear submarines, the surface fleet is smaller than the first two, and the sea air supremacy and long-range strike power are impressive, and there is the potential to surpass the first two).

Fifth place, Japan (two *** aircraft carriers in active service, 6 Aegis ships + Akizuki-class Japanese shield, Takanami-class + Murayu-class modern destroyers, 24 large-tonnage conventional submarines. There are few ships in the Sea of Japan that are more than 20 years old, and 15 years are considered old. One word new, the number of capital battleships is large)

Sixth, China (a large number of conventional submarines 60 + 8 nuclear submarines (guess). The newly commissioned Chinese Aegis, the old modern class, 14 new youth, the number of modern ships is inferior to that of Japan)

Clause. 7. India Italy ...

China's total strength: 10,000, of which 2.3 million belong to the Second Artillery. The others are the Navy and the Air Force, with the Air Force 10,000 and the Navy 400,000.

Aircraft carriers are about to be launched! The number of nuclear warheads in China is 400-600. There are 6-9 nuclear submarines in service (possibly 3 "Jin" class, 1 "Xia" class, 3 "Han" class) and 4 "Jin" class ICBM nuclear submarines under construction.

The first in the Army, the third in the Navy, the second in the Air Force, and the fourth in overall strength. The United States has 1.45 million active duty, 510,000 in the Army, 10,000 in the Navy, and 10,000 in the Air Force. A total of 13 aircraft carriers have been decommissioned, 2 have been decommissioned, and two "Ford" class electromagnetic catapult aircraft carriers are under construction.

The number of nuclear submarines is 95. First of all (except for the Army): Russia has 1.2 million active personnel, 860,000 in the Army, 190,000 in the Navy, and 180,000 in the Air Force. One aircraft carrier, 2 more in the next 15 years.

Nuclear submarines 37 and above The most famous nuclear submarine of the "Typhoon" class is ICBM. France has a total strength of 430,000 troops, including 10,000 in the army, 80,000 in the navy, and 10,000 in the air force. Aircraft carrier "Charles de Gaulle" nuclear-powered aircraft carrier.

Nuclear submarine 13. India has a total strength of 1.33 million, with an army of 1.1 million, a navy of 130,000 and an air force of 100,000. 1 aircraft carrier is about to be decommissioned, 2 are under construction.

2-4 nuclear submarines. The number of nuclear warheads is about 80 pieces! Overall Standing:

China's comprehensive war strength ranks 3rd in the world (the United States, Russia, and China), its comprehensive military strength ranks 4th in the world (the United States, Russia, France, and China), its conventional military strength ranks 3rd in the world (the United States, Russia, and China), its nuclear military strength ranks 4th in the world (the United States, Russia, France, and China), its army military strength ranks 2nd in the world (Russia, China, and the United States), its air force military strength ranks 3rd in the world (the United States, Russia, and China), its naval military strength ranks 2nd in the world (the United States, China, and Russia), and its conventional naval fleet ranks 3rd in Asia (China, India, and China). Japan) ranks first in Asia in terms of naval nuclear forces (China).

First of all, it is necessary to understand that in the absence of the air force of both sides, Japan is worse than Japan.