How big is the difference between the naval strength of China and the United States?

Updated on international 2024-03-04
20 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The United States has 11 aircraft carrier strike groups, 12 expeditionary strike groups. 50 Berqueque destroyers, more than 20 Ticonderoga cruisers, capable of performing long-range strikes and anti-missiles. China has only 15 main combat ships with a displacement of more than 4,000 tons, and its combat effectiveness cannot be compared with that of the United States.

    The United States has more than 50 attack nuclear submarines, while China has only five Han-class and several Shang-class submarines. But the combat power of conventional submarines in our country is considerable. In terms of amphibious landings and replenishment at sea, we are even more incomparable.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    In terms of scale, the number of the US Navy is about 8 to 10 times that of China, and if we take into account all aspects such as equipment maintenance, military integrity, training, and morale, the gap of 100 times is more than 100 times.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    In recent years, the naval strength of China and the United States has been a hot topic. Recently, the U.S. "National Interest" published an article revealing the huge disparity in naval strength between China and the United States. Who is better?

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The Chinese frigate went out to sea, and after a turn, the deck was scooped, and you say how big the gap is, but the Chinese submarine is really good.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The gap is difficult to describe in words, and it can only be said in general terms that the gap is very large.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The number of fleets and the number of aircraft carriers are as bad as they are.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The United States has aircraft carriers, China does not, how much worse do you say?

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Because China's military power at sea was very weak in the past, but now it far exceeds that of many countries, so everyone will be impressed by China's naval strength, but what the strength is, it will definitely not be made public.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Although the Chinese Navy has ushered in a stage of vigorous development in military strength in recent years, there is still a lot of room for improvement compared with the US Navy, and it still needs to continue to work hard to catch up and surpass. Next, the author will analyze from multiple angles, what is the gap between the US Navy and the Chinese Navy? <>

    First of all, in terms of numbers, the Chinese navy does seem to have an advantage on the surface, but most of them are small and medium-sized fleets. When war actually breaks out, it is measured by combat capability rather than quantity. Secondly, in terms of scientific and technological strength, the US military is more advanced, whether it is an aircraft carrier or a flagship aircraft, their combat capability is more perfect, after all, the research and development time is too long and has accumulated a lot of experience, on the contrary, the domestic aircraft carrier is in the toddler stage and cannot be confronted.

    Finally, as far as maritime deployment is concerned, in the event of turbulence, the US military can mobilize other military bases at sea to intervene at any time. In contrast to this, China's deployment capability at sea is limited and there is no perfect military base, so even if it can crush the US military in terms of quantity, there is still a long way to explore in the future! <>

    And on the way to developing a battleship, the biggest problem is displacement! There is a lot of knowledge in this, and the so-called blood discharge is the weight that the battleship can normally discharge in the water when it is fully loaded, which is generally measured in tons. Displacement is closely related to the speed and maneuverability of the warship, although the pace of research and development has never stopped, but compared with the United States, the Chinese people urgently need to develop large-displacement warships.

    However, the Chinese people do not need to be arrogant, on the whole, the overall development momentum of the Chinese Navy is very strong, and the future is promising. It is believed that it will not be long before the strength of the navy can be greatly enhanced with the unremitting research and development of the Chinese people. And internationally, China has always played the role of a defender of peace, although we know that there is a big gap between China and the powerful countries in terms of strength, but the Chinese people have the advantage of making use of their strengths and avoiding weaknesses, and we have even had a successful war record of fighting the strong with the weak.

    So there are still many advantages, and it is completely able to defend the country!

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    There is a gap, because the United States has a lot of aircraft carriers, and China has only 3.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    There is a certain gap. But the overall gap is already very small, and I believe that we will soon catch up with each other.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    There will definitely be a clear gap, China is even better, and there are many people who are particularly strong. Everyone is an elite.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    It is not. Chinese state-owned enterprises are also vigorously developing commercial transportation, which has become the engine of naval construction on both sides. In the event of a conflict, industrial power, including commercial shipyards, could easily be diverted to military production and maintenance, increasing the continent's ability to create new military units.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    This is an exaggeration, and China's navy is still relatively weak compared to the US military, and it is particularly lacking in combat experience.

    Moreover, there is still a certain gap between various equipment, especially aircraft carriers, and the US military, but with the continuous development of the Chinese Navy, the gap is gradually decreasing.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    It's true, because the equipment and strength of China's navy and air force are very strong, and many advanced ones are in the forefront of the world, plus the overall combat capability is very powerful, so the statement is true.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    The U.S. military said: China's naval strength ranks first in the world.

    1. The strength of the Air Force ranks third! I think what they say may be true, that the Chinese navy is very strong.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    China's navy and air force are powerful, but they have been magnified by the United States, saying that China is the number one in the world, in order to make other countries target China, and the United States has bad intentions.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    1. Aircraft carriers.

    2 large aircraft carriers in China, 11 supercarriers in the United States, 1 large aircraft carrier in Russia, 2 large aircraft carriers in the United Kingdom but not in service, 2 medium aircraft carriers in India (one not in service). The Chinese aircraft carrier may be inferior in quality to the British one (the British aircraft carrier is an integrated electric propulsion), but both of the British aircraft carriers are not in service, and now the British aircraft carriers will not be equipped with F2020 carrier-based fighters until at least 35.

    Now China has at least one large aircraft carrier with combat effectiveness, second only to the United States and temporarily ranked second in the world.

    2. Aegis ships. China has 22 ships, the United States has 80 ships, Japan and the United Kingdom have 6 ships, and China ranks second. (A cloud on the slopes of the mountains of England and Japan has been blown away by the rain and wind.)

    Britain built six Type 45 shield ships with all the strength of the whole country, and even smashed pots to sell iron, while China built more than 20 Aegis ships, which is really easy. This is the gap in comprehensive national strength).

    3. Submarines, the first in the United States, more than 70 nuclear submarines, China's second, more than 70 submarines (60 conventional submarines, more than 10 nuclear submarines), the United States is all nuclear submarines, ranking first. China second.

    4. Third-generation aircraft. The United States is the first, with 2,800, China is second, with 1,300, and Russia is third, with more than 800. Japan, Britain and France are left with no more than 500 aircraft.

    China is about a quarter of the size of the United States, and is expected to reach half of the United States by 2030!

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    There is a gap of at least thirty years with the US Navy in general.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Both in terms of the number and quality of warships, the Chinese Navy still has a long way to go.

Related questions
2 answers2024-03-04

Russia is located in eastern Europe and northern Asia, across the Eurasian continent, with a maximum length of 9,000 kilometers from east to west and a maximum width of 4,000 kilometers from north to south, covering an area of more than 10,000 square kilometers, making it the largest country in the world in terms of territorial area. The terrain is low in the west and high in the east, and part of the Great Plain of Eastern Europe (also known as the Russian Plain) and the West Siberian Plain are located in its western and central parts, and the area of the plain accounts for about 1 2 of the total area of Russia. Agricultural land is flat, fertile and large-scale. >>>More

5 answers2024-03-04

It's up to you...

However, if it hurts people, it's still Koreans, Japanese machismo is stronger, and South Korea, now it's natural for men to hurt girls, and it's more romantic than Japanese. >>>More

10 answers2024-03-04

It was signed between the Northern Song Dynasty and the Liao State in 1004. Song gave Liaojuan 200,000 horses and 100,000 taels of silver every year. The Liao State invaded the Northern Song Dynasty, and the Liao army was killed by the Song army's firearms, and the Liao State proposed negotiations and signed the "Lanyuan Alliance", in fact, the Northern Song Dynasty signed it under favorable conditions, so this was an unequal treaty.

11 answers2024-03-04

The birthplace of visual kei is in Japan, and it was first proposed by hide (deceased), the lead guitarist of the original band X-Japan, and on the cover of the band's early ** called Blue Blood, the word "visual kei" was used for the first time, that is, Japanese (derived from English visual). Therefore, hide is the predecessor of all visual kei artists, encouraging the efforts and struggles of generations of visual kei talents. >>>More

7 answers2024-03-04

**Equipment is at least 30 years apart.