Why not use tank armor on cars, so that you are not afraid of crashing?

Why not use tank armor on cars? Aren't you afraid of creating? Because tank armor is a tank armored vehicle used by our country's armed forces, it cannot be used in a car, the car is not bad, not afraid of collision, we want to drive safely, we are not afraid of not colliding, we cannot put a tank on a car.

This is even more unsafe, after all, civilian cars are driving on normal roads, not on the battlefield, and if there is a collision, if the car is too hard, it is very likely to hurt people.

Use tank armor on cars, cars and cars are not afraid of colliding, and the losses are greater when they collide with other things, and can cars equipped with tank armor still run fast.

Tank armor is used in ordinary civilian vehicles, which will increase the cost of production and use. Moreover, it is not suitable for the use of ordinary civilian vehicles.

No matter what economic activity, it is necessary to consider a cost-effective price, so it is simply impossible for armor to be used in cars, and another point is that according to traffic rules or national laws, it is not allowed. Represents personal views only.

If you use tank armor in a car, although you are not afraid of installing it, its cost will rise, and it will not meet our aesthetics!

Because the steel of the tank armor is very heavy, if the tank armor is used in the car, the wheels should also be changed to chain wheels for the tank. Although I am not afraid of collisions, I can't drive on the road.

To reduce or eliminate traffic accidents, we must first improve the safety awareness and driving skills of drivers, rather than relying on the installation of tank armor on automobiles.

If you use tank armor on a car. I can't pay for the fuel every day. And nowadays, many people are concerned about aesthetics. If that's the case, no one will buy it.

This is too heavy, if it is installed in a car, the fuel consumption is very large, and the car is also very inflexible. The speed of the car will also slow down a lot.

If you use the armor of the tank on the car, the car will not have that speed, and it will drive as slowly as the tank, but the engine will also be enlarged and many places will have to be changed.

Why don't you use tank armor on cars Aren't you afraid of crashing People produce cars one is to bring inconvenience and the other is not to heavy seat belts Pay attention to safety Not to hit such a thick iron sheet of tanks and armored vehicles Not to hit the seat belts to pay attention to safety is not to put tanks and.

If tank armor is mounted on a car, on the one hand, the cost increases, and on the other hand, the weight on the road increases.

Because the tank armored car is very heavy, it is used on the car to pull the weight of the car without pulling anything else.

Consumers are more aware of the fuel consumption of family cars, and the weight of the car increases after the tank armor is installed, and the fuel consumption also increases, so that the cost of daily use will also go up, and the cost of the armor itself is also high, the above is part of the reason why the car is not equipped with armor.

Because of the high cost of tank armor and its own weight, it is very impractical to put on the body of a car.

You can't hold this idea at all, the weight of the armor of the tank is very large, and on an ordinary vehicle, this kind of fuel consumption is something you can't imagine.

Armor is used in cars, that is, the current armored personnel carriers, which are already available, see the picture below.

Patria AMV armored personnel carrier.

The first is that if it is loaded with armored vehicles, it will be heavy and fuel-consuming, and the second is the rising cost, you can look at several foreign family cars like armor!

Tank armor is very expensive, and most people can't afford to buy and use as much as they want, so they use ordinary materials.

If it is installed, the weight of the car will be heavier, the cost will be higher, and the fuel consumption will be more, so no one will buy the car.

If you use armor in a car, you have to consider how much fuel it consumes, which will bring great economic losses.

Tank armor is too extravagant, and we probably can't afford it in a car.

How much displacement can a heavy car drive to run, even if it runs with fuel consumption, no one can stand it.

Why don't you use tanks and armored vehicles on cars, aren't you afraid of mistakes? If they are used on the top of the car, it will cost a lot of money, and who can afford it?

You have a peculiar idea, do you know how much a tank weighs him? Do you know the armor of a tank, how much does it weigh? How much power do you think it takes to put the armor of a tank on a car?

Let's not say that it is not safe, how many people can afford to buy it at this cost.

Isn't that overkill? Square peg. Where and what materials.

When an armored vehicle encounters a tank, it must quickly open more tanks due to its own maneuverability, and use its own ** to counterattack.

If there is a machine gun or heavy machine gun on the armored vehicle, you can hit the weak parts of the rear of the tank, tracks, fire control systems, etc., and use the terrain to get rid of it while fighting. Or attract tanks to areas convenient for infantry and make infantry anti-tank.

If the armored car has anti-tank missiles, then it is possible to strike with anti-tank missiles.

When a tank meets an armored vehicle, it is not necessarily the armored vehicle that suffers.

In general, additional armor is bolted.

As for whether to make a 30-ton combat vehicle, it mainly depends on its use, the main purpose of armored vehicles is to transport personnel or materials, and the non-combat front-line use generally emphasizes mobility, and there is a certain amount of protection. If protection increases, mobility and passability decrease. Infantry fighting vehicles, on the other hand, are front-line combat protection, which is naturally thicker.

However, the country's engines have always been a weak point, and one of the main reasons why the export of Peruvian tanks has been blocked by Ukraine is that we use its engine technology.

The power and accuracy of the vehicle-mounted artillery are not a thing, the power is related to the design, caliber ratio, gunpowder used, and the material of the warhead. Accuracy is related to design and processing technology. Because of the radiation they contain, the depleted uranium bombs are not used by any country except the United States, because of the problems of radiation and post-war pollution.

It's not that it didn't work.

1: Generally fixed by screws.

2: The West does not build armored vehicles of more than 19t now, China is not unable to build but useless, the increase in weight affects maneuverability, and the cross-country ability directly decreases.

3: Lean oil bombs seem to be only Britain and the United States.

1. a bolt.

2. There are no 30-ton armored vehicles in the West, and the 30-ton ones are called infantry fighting vehicles. China does not yet have tanks of this type. Even if it is developed, because of the limitations of engine technology, in order to achieve a considerable power, only a larger engine can be installed, and in the end, it is like a tank, there is not much internal space, and a few soldiers cannot be built, and the result is still not able to make something with the same concept as others.

3. There is also a distance in artillery processing technology, which is certain, even if there are depleted uranium shells, on the whole, they cannot reach the level of others.

1. Screw fixing.

Second, third, the issue of cost. The army needs high-quality and low-cost equipment, and is more willing to use half of the ** to purchase equipment that reaches the level of 80% in Europe and the United States. European countries only purchase a few or a dozen vehicles a year, and we have to replace hundreds of vehicles a year, and the cost is limited.

In fact, we can also do things of the same level.

Depleted uranium bombs are nuclear ** and are expressly prohibited by the United Nations, except for a hegemonic country like the United States that dares to use them at will?