Can technology detect particles that reach the speed of light?

Yes! CERN announced on the 23rd that they have discovered that some particles may travel faster than the speed of light, and once this discovery is verified to be true, it will overturn Einstein's theory of relativity, which supports modern physics.

The theory of relativity says that the speed of light is the fastest.

On the same day, CERN released the results of a study in which researchers allowed neutrinos to travel at near-light speeds arrived 60 nanoseconds earlier than expected (1 nanosecond equals one billionth of a second), which researchers believe could mean that these neutrinos are traveling 60 nanoseconds faster than the speed of light.

According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, the speed of light is the limit of the speed of the universe, and no matter can exceed the speed of light. If the results of this study are proved to be true, it means that the foundation of modern physics will be seriously challenged.

The neutrino beam for the study originated at CERN in Geneva, and was received by the Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics near Rome, Italy. With a distance of 730 kilometers between the emitter and receiver of the beam, the researchers made the beam travel at nearly the speed of light and determined the speed of the neutrinos by the time and distance of their last travel. Neutrino beams travel through underground pipes between two places.

Motion, with almost no mass and no electric charge, is able to silently pass through the human body, through walls, the sun, the Milky Way, without being aware of it. For this reason, they are called "ghost particles".

Recent experiments have said that neutrinos are 60 nanoseconds faster than light, and whether the experiment went wrong has yet to be confirmed.

As Einstein predicted in his theory of relativity, no particle with mass can reach the speed of light, which is about 186,000 miles per second (kilometers per second). No matter how much energy is added to the mass of an object, its velocity cannot reach this limit.

In modern accelerators, particles are accelerated to speeds very close to the speed of light. For example, the main injector at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory accelerates protons to times the speed of light. As the speed of the particle gets closer and closer to the speed of light, the accelerator increases the kinetic energy of the particle more and more.

Because, as Einstein tells us, the energy of an object is equal to its mass multiplied by the square of the speed of light (e=mc2), and increasing the energy actually also increases the mass of the particle. In other words: when there are more "e", there must be more "m".

When an object has a mass close to but not at the speed of light, its effective mass grows larger.

Does faster-than-light motion really exist?

Einstein's theory of relativity does not allow the speed of light, because objects have mass, and if they move faster than the speed of light, the mass is infinite, and of course the energy required is also infinite. So the theory of relativity does not support the speed of light. However, in recent years, it has been said that a substance called neutrinos has no mass and has the potential to move faster than the speed of light.

It is impossible for mass matter to move faster than the speed of light. So if this particle has mass, then it cannot move faster than the speed of light.

Is faster-than-light possible? Does a person running on a light-speed spaceship overturn the theory of relativity?

Seriously, I also watched the show that day, but I also forgot which episode it was, and I was also shocked at the time, I don't know if it was true or not. Later, I checked something, and it felt real!

Now there is a theory that dark matter is faster than the speed of light, so we can't see it (photons can't keep up), and therefore we can't check it at the current level (it seems to be proving that some dark matter is 100,000 times faster than photons).

And it is also very likely that the "Theory of Relativity" will be overturned because of this, because the "Theory of Relativity" can also be overturned because of this, because the "Theory of Relativity" is based on light. In fact, there is nothing, after all, our understanding is very limited, don't take the theory of relativity as the absolute truth, after all, Newton's classical mechanics was also an absolute authority at that time, and it was not later proved that it was not applicable to microscopic particles.

All in all, I think that there is something faster than a photon, after all, the photon is only one of the countless particles in the vast universe, and we can't see it as a god just because we can see it!

No, there are a lot of programs that go into science that are not scientific.

I haven't heard of it, but it really shows that Einstein's theory of relativity is wrong, and a lot of things in modern objects have to be changed.