Without the Qing Dynasty, wouldn t the history of China be different?

Updated on history 2024-04-17
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    China was the world's first developed country as early as the Ming Dynasty.

    If there had been no invasion of Manchuria. Even if China does not rule the world, it will spread Chinese culture to all parts of the world, so that the people of the world can pass the fourth level of Chinese.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    But only the Western powers and the Manchus have the strength to unify China, and if there are no ethnic minorities in East Asia, I am afraid that even the problem of where this China is now!

    The most optimistic estimate is that there are at least 3 or more countries on the map of China now, of course, it is possible to develop economically, because other regimes will not inherit the Ming Dynasty's policy of closing the country at all! This was the biggest mistake of the Qing Dynasty!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    This is hard to say, after all, it is history, and history has no assumptions. If I have to assume, I think that China can smoothly transition to the industrial age, but we don't think that China exists, because the whole earth is estimated to be Chinese.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    That was a step that must be taken in the progress of the times, and even if there was no Qing Dynasty, there would have been other dynasties to complete its historical mission in its place.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    There shouldn't be such a situation, because the existence of such a dynasty also has advantages and disadvantages, so it can't be said whether it will lead to the outcome of such a thing, because there is no such an if.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    (⊙o⊙)…If there was no Qing Dynasty, wouldn't there be nothing? How can we talk about falling behind?

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The Qing Dynasty in history was not so unbearable, at least the life brought to the common people by the prosperous Kangqian era was still very good.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    This is not the case, in fact, the development of the Qing Dynasty in history is still relatively good, but it will be more unbearable in the later period.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The Qing Dynasty was still quite good, because in the dynasty of Emperor Kangxi, people lived happier and more stable.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The Qing Dynasty was still relatively bad, because after the Qing Dynasty, it seemed that we were already going to perish, and in the end, in terms of our Chinese history, it should be a good thing, because it was the Qing Dynasty that went to the end and established our People's Republic of China.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    It is a dynasty with good and bad days. It's good, it's very bad that the Qing Dynasty was in the last period.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The dynasties that hindered China's progress missed an opportunity to change the world pattern.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    To tell the truth, if China's industrial revolution developed earlier than Japan, it entered the capitalist countries. That could be a disaster for the world, because capitalists are virtuous.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Uncle Mao's evaluation of the Qing Dynasty is very far-sighted, and to this day, when he continues to preach Mongolia and Manchuria, it is very instructive to look at Uncle Mao.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    The Qing Dynasty was a unified dynasty, but it treated the Manchu and Han ethnic groups as nobles and slaves respectively.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    The Qing Dynasty is a unified dynasty, who taught you not to?

Related questions
8 answers2024-04-17

No! The original form of the boy is Cao Yin, and the prototype of the youth is Suo Etu.

3 answers2024-04-17

Nowadays, most of our understanding of the history of the Qing Dynasty is learned from TV dramas, and most of the battles between harems are involved, so many people are not clear about the battles in the early Qing Dynasty. Before the Qing Dynasty entered the customs, Huang Taiji led the Manchu bannermen to fight in the south and the north, but for various reasons, Huang Taiji never set up a prince. >>>More

9 answers2024-04-17

There is no hatred, according to the history books, there is no, if the throne is not counted >>>More

12 answers2024-04-17

Because after all, Yinyu is his own brother, so he is still relatively tolerant of him, and he did not die.

13 answers2024-04-17

The real planner should be Wu Sidao, he used the strategy of killing people with a knife, and the eighth elder brother handed over the letter secretly exchanged between the prince and others to Kangxi, Kangxi was furious and threw the letter to the prince. The prince felt that his position was not secure, so he rebelled, but he still failed and was deposed.