Which is better, Sony Mk200 or Sony V55 It s very tangled

Hello, after a personal comparison audition, the two headphones are not very comparable, in fact, V55 is also a lot cheaper than K450. In terms of the quality of the headphones, the MK200 is much better than the V55!

V55The shape may be more fashionable, the color of the wire is brighter, but the sound is very general, known as "monitor headphones", but it is not the quality of monitor headphones at all, and it also uses "heavy bass" as a selling point to attract ordinary consumers, you must know that monitor headphones require the restoration of the essence of sound, and use higher resolution to capture the details of the sound, rather than engaging in any "heavy bass" to please the ears of listeners! In fact, its bass is not as good as the Sony XB series, which has more powerful bass, and the other frequency bands are also average. From the point of view below, it's just a spectacle!

Although the quality of K450 is good, the appearance is a lot simpler, and there is a more troublesome place that the new K450 headphones may not sound particularly good, and they are more "stuffy". This headset is generally less "pot",The official recommendation is to burn the machine for more than 400 hours to play full strength,The new headphones that are not boiled and the headphones that are boiled on sound completely two feelings。

I think that since LZ is not generally out of the street, you can consider the MK200. Personally, the new MK200 is not necessarily a bad headphone for the LZ. But the quality of the MK200 as a headset is higher than that of the V55.

Your phone can drive well and not be very picky**. It's an excellent portable headset!

The latter is better, I personally think.

Just buy an LT18i.

You have to choose between 26 and 22, and you can't choose 26 and 22.

I started in Shanghai in May 22, I feel good, the battery can not be removed, the battery of 1305 play for half a day, standby plus one or two electric Wu filial piety for two days. The pixels are basically satisfied, and they are quite clear. **Headphones are ordinary, I'm not an audiophile, it's okay...

Shanghai 3200 into the reed grinding hand!

Samsung i9100 is very good! It's super popular! I'm also thinking about buying one of this...

It is recommended that you buy the Huawei P1 which is really good. It is very suitable for girls. Cai: 2199 A foreign aircraft with a performance of more than 3500.

Sony 26 9100 white version But I really want to buy a few hundred dollars to buy a white 4s Recently, if I looked at the port line, it was about 4300

In fact, you can add some money to buy an iPhone, or just use this 3500 to buy an iPad2, both of which are very useful, I have been using it for a long time, 3500 mobile phones are actually really good, or you can use this money to buy a Samsung, you can buy an iPad, if you play more games, buy an iPad!

Don't Rosso, a one-sentence suggestion, play Sony to play mirrorless, play its SLR (in fact, now called single-electric, Sony has long been out of SLR) is not promising.

Purely from the machine, SLR and mirrorless are used for half-frame CMOS imaging, which should be similar, but the choice of mirrorless lenses is relatively small, and SLR lenses are rich, so in general, SLR imaging is better than mirrorless.

The advantage of mirrorless is that the weight is light and the volume is small, in order to reduce the volume, the content inside will either shrink or the cost will rise. SLR is large in size and weight, but there are many processes and properties that cannot be achieved by mirrorless in large volumes. Performance operation SLR has an even greater advantage.

The optical viewfinder has been going on for decades, and the relatively mature is also the advantage of the SLR. The mirrorless can basically only be framed with the screen, and it will not be clear when the light is bright, which will affect the use.

Another problem with mirrorless vs. SLR is that it consumes a lot of power. SLR can generally last for four or five days, and the mirrorless basically needs to be charged once a day.

It is still recommended to buy a single reflex.

DSLR recommendations: Pentax K30, K5II, K5, Canon 60D, 600D, 650D, 700D, Nikon D90, etc.

Mirrorless recommendation: Sony's NEX series.

Sony's because of the relatively high price, I don't appreciate it very much! The Canon is OK, the price is okay, and the camera configuration is good. For example, the ixus510's image processing is good, and it can also shoot very clearly in terms of details. In addition, the fuselage is relatively thin, which is more convenient to carry.

Of course, the SLR is recommended at the same price, which is easy to change, more operable and more comfortable.

In terms of price, of course, the SLR is good, and the SLR is more professional. But it's not that expensive things are good, the key point is to depend on your own needs, just like if you buy a camera for tens of thousands of dollars but you don't know how to use it, and it's not as convenient as the thousands of dollars you buy

Sony's mirrorless is still quite good, and it is recommended to buy the NEX 5T. Canon's DSLR recommends a large 700D set.

In any case, in terms of convenience, the P510 is much stronger than the SLR or card player, but in any case, the image quality of the SLR is much stronger than the card player or telephoto machine or even the professional-grade card machine.

Only enjoy on the computer without magnification, then all cameras are about the same.

Since it's almost the same if you don't zoom in, why not buy it for ease of use? So the P510 is the ideal choice, you will feel how cool it is after using it!

When those short-throw cameras can't do anything about small targets in the distance, they know how good it would be to have a telephoto.

At the beginning, I used a card machine, and then I bought a telephoto machine to give away the card machine, and after a while, I bought a DSLR, and the telephoto machine was also given away, and now I still want to buy a telephoto machine, because the telephoto machine is really convenient, and the SLR needs several lenses to achieve such a large zoom factor, and it takes several lenses for such a long focal length.

Canon SX220, SX40

Sony, Nikon's DC is no longer good.

Pay attention to the image quality of the Canon SX40, and then the Fujifilm HS30, HX200 The image quality is very poor.

I bought the P500 in August last year, and I bought the D700 in March this year, to be honest, the P500 is also pretty good, the king of telephoto. But the imaging is very dark in most cases, you can do your homework first, the size of the sensor determines the imaging quality, if the requirements are not high, it doesn't matter, the telephoto is to shoot things in the distance, in fact, it is of little practical significance. It's better to buy a Nikon D3100, you can't add much money, and start playing SLR.

Sharp LCD-40GE220A ASV panel, the Japanese LCD TV faucet for many years, has its own uniqueness in making panels.

I trust Sony, a lot of camera equipment is known to Sony, and the restoration is definitely the most thoroughly researched by this company.

Sony KLV-40BX425 I just bought it in Suning and Gome, and the one I tried first, I went around in a big circle, and finally I chose this one in Suning. I come with a mobile hard disk,Because there is no partition,The domestic ones are not easy to identify,The color is not good to identify,Sharp's LCD that can support RMVB is more than 7000,Sony This read mobile hard disk is particularly fast,And the color is much better than the domestic one。 Sharp's 7,000-plus model is not as comfortable as Sony's.

Both have their strengths.

Personally, I feel that Vegas has stronger customization performance for special projects, more intuitive operation, and more comprehensive functions (you can easily do a lot of complex special effects).

However, it is generally reported that Edius is slightly faster to render.

Among the non-editing software, Vegas is the first to support 4K videos, the first to support 3D videos, and the first to support 64-bit. The latest Vegas10 already supports OFX plug-ins, and the choice of plug-ins is even wider.

In terms of rendering speed and clarity, Edius is definitely the top performer, and in terms of production efficiency and operability, Vegas is definitely better than Edius.

Personally, I think it's vegas

It is easy to operate and has good compatibility.

First: Japan's Sony company has never produced any large-screen MP4 or MP5, so what you buy must be domestic knockoffs.

Second: The current 7-inch domestic Android tablet is very cheap, you can buy it for about 400, do you think your MP5 is still worth buying?

Each has its own good, and it is not practical to buy things (mp5 is actually not very good, I have one).

WX50 is newer, but it is convenient to say that WX5C is better, these two are not professional, but the effect of finding out is definitely WX5C better.

The WX5C has been discontinued in some places, and you can only buy it in stock or second-hand on **. If there is a stock, ** is almost close to 2000 oceans, and the 10-year-old machine is really expensive. Pixel 1220W, 5x light change, excellent Sony G lens, WX50 is new to the market this year, 1620W pixel, 5x light change, using a better Carl Zeiss lens, built-in filters, such as toy camera (Lomo), popular colors, miniature landscapes, etc., can be regarded as a smaller version of Sony's hot-selling mirrorless NEX-5N. I use this myself, it's very easy to use, and it can be used as a single-lens reflex or mirrorless standby. **It is around 1500, which is more cost-effective than WX5C.

Anyway, they are all consumer-grade card machines, if you really want to choose a better and more cost-effective one, WX50 is a better choice.