Please recommend a digital camera with a price range of 2500 3000!!

Recommended: Canon, Nikon, and Sony's three major camera manufacturers.

Canon: A3100 A3000 IXUS105 is SX120 IS

Nikon: S6000 S4000 S630 S570

Sony : W390 W350

These are the mainstream machines in the market, and since their launch, the market has responded well. The main performance is good: more than 10 million pixels Zoom:

4-6x dynamic shooting, macro stabilization and other mainstream functions are complete and of high quality, making it a good choice for home machines.

The Nikon S6000 Canon SX120 is highly recommended here, these two machines are fully functional, the picture quality is excellent, and the operation is easy **Reasonable, with all the mainstream features on the market, more than enough for home use.

When purchasing a machine, find a knowledgeable friend to accompany you and test the machine on site to ensure quality.

To be honest, there is no need to buy such an expensive home machine, just enough, Nikon's "L" series models such as L22 L21 L20 are good, the image quality is good, **Cheap, enough for home use, to consume rationally!

About 2000 machines to card machine, recommend ixus210, but more than 2000, large screen, high pixels, Canon quality, brand, performance are better in the same industry.

If you like telephoto machines, Fujifilm's F85 has strong performance parameters and is relatively convenient to operate, with some manual functions.

There are also special ones such as Sony's TX5, with waterproof, this kind of card machine is also suitable for home use, and a family can shoot it when they go there, and it is often not missed, hehe.

There are too many models now, mainly depending on what the landlord likes, and there is a general direction and mental positioning, which is better recommended.

The S510 has a high-speed start-up capability of seconds, and the capture ability is excellent. The camera uses an 8.1 million pixel CCD, and the camera is also equipped with an inch, 230,000 pixel LCD screen. Basic configuration of this camera:

It uses a 1-inch, 8.1 million effective pixel CCD sensor, and a 3x optical zoom Nikkor lens, with an equivalent focal length of 35 105mm, a maximum aperture, and a minimum focusing distance of 15cm. I recommended this one for my friends, and they all said that it was very easy to use, and I have used it for a few years, it is easy to use and affordable!

I'll tell you first, I'm good at eating.

I say this because you want to buy a camera just like me.

I just got stupid and stupid and I changed the number.

I just felt like a gunslinger o(o

I think you have to look at the information on the Internet yourself, and some people say that although they are poisonous, they are very good for Fujifilm F200 or F60 imaging, but they need to have a certain technology, Sony's T700 or T900, I use T200 anyway, and it doesn't matter if you are stupid, it is easy to use, and it is comfortable.

Sony's **expensive but fashionable and good-looking.

Panasonic's ZS1 is good, because people on the Internet say it's good, O(o, she said that Japan's DC is Panasonic's master, Sony and Canon are relying on advertising, and it's okay to listen to it.

Remember to tell me what you bought, and let me refer to it.

**Forget it, I only bought a camera that wanted to make me cry, and I wouldn't use Samsung's or something, the one with a big lens.

It feels good, but stabilization isn't strong.

The clarity of the photography is good.

You might as well go straight to buy a DSLR It's still good to go out (o(o) I'm going to buy it, although it's not decided yet.

Run more to the mall.

Think about it.

Huaxia equipment ****, the best cost performance is Nikon, Panasonic, Fuji brand, Nikon Canon is relatively large.

In terms of configuration, each brand has powerful models.

Nikon L110 Canon IXUS105 Sony W350 are all very good, Nikon L22 S5710 is very cost-effective, because the parameters are available on the Internet, so I won't paste it, and the landlord will see it for himself.

Digital camera pixels have been climbing, but ** basically maintained at 1500-2000 more mainstream camera**, domestic brands may be cheaper, but the performance or details are still not very satisfactory, I think you can go to the brand ** buy above to see, like the above recommended digital camera better brands are Canon, Nikon Nikon, Sony Sony, Samsung Samsung, Fujifilm and so on, They are all very good digital brands in the industry, and the choice of digital cameras is inseparable from the comparison of these brands.

3500 or so:

Canon S5 is 8 million pixels, 12x optical zoom, inch rotating screen, 0cm macro.

Nikon P80 10.1 million pixels, 18x optical zoom, inch screen.

Olympus SP-570 10 million pixels, 20x optical zoom, inch screen, 1cm macro, 26 wide angle.

Olympus 1030SW 10.1 million pixels, double optical zoom, inch screen, 28 wide angle, 10 meters water resistance, 2 meters shock resistance, 100 kg compression resistance, -10 degree freeze resistance.

Those who are seriously against the first floor are said to be canonical, and nothing else is worthless! Who is the display skewed, the lens cover is not tightly closed, and the display is not clear? It's not all Canon's, even tens of thousands of SLRs can have jagged teeth when they are red again, whose machine is it?

Is Canon good? If you have a performance failure within 15 days after you buy another brand of machine, the merchant can directly replace it. What about Canon? Canon's machines must be sent to the place designated by the manufacturer for identification first, and people say that they can be replaced, so they can replace it for you. This is a good manufacturer?

The Hasselblad has a 150,000 body, does Canon have it? Isn't Canon a cow? Why don't you produce one.

Every brand has a good machine, mainly depending on the price. Don't blindly listen to the professional, the professional is good. But good machines are smashed out of money, Canon and Nikon's lenses are good, and they all know that there are tens of thousands of lenses, and the effect is indeed good.

But think about it, on a camera of about 3000, how good a lens can it use? Is it possible to use the technology and materials of tens of thousands of lenses on more than 3,000 machines?

Between 3000-4000 belongs to a chicken rib price area, there is no particularly cost-effective machine, either buy more than 2000, or buy more than 5000;

If you have to buy this price range, then only Canon G7, to be honest, I think since the G5, the G series has declined;

Don't buy the Canon S series (e.g. S80), they are all electric tigers, super power-hungry, and the standby time is particularly short!

Highly recommended! Canon 400D, black, quasi-professional, at this price of more than 5000, the imaging quality is not spelled with him, a smaller version of the professional model, it looks good, I guess you are not bad for adding a few hundred dollars, believe me, I guarantee that you will not regret it!

Otherwise, you can buy a Canon A640 for about 2400 yuan, the best machine at this price!

I've been talking about Canon for a long time.

A few more reasons to give you:

Nikon -- In recent years, the camera industry has declined, and you can also see that there is not even a manufacturing plant in China, a large human resources area. It has a common problem with Sony's digital cameras, the color reproduction is not good, and the shooting is too vivid;

Sony - its Walkman technology, other brands can not compare, but its digital camera, alas, not only the color reproduction is not good, but also has a lot of restlessness, even now it advocates the Alpha 100 This professional series of products, can not escape the trouble of more restlessness;

Fuji - there are a lot of restless points, in the catastrophe is inevitable, but also advocates the new hexagonal CCD technology, which is useless at all, and has no effect;

Olympus - there are many shortcomings to mention;

Kodak - a few years ago, the international cost-effective products were released, but they have also declined in the past two years;

As for Panasonic, Samsung, Casio, these digital camera industry nobodies, there is no imaging technology at all, just want to make some money in this field, these brands in camera imaging skills can not compete Canon Nikon, just use some so-called "professional", anti-shake, OEM Zeiss lenses, Leica lenses to create gimmicks, attract the attention of consumers, flashy!

The one who strikes iron wants to embroider; Canon is almost the best in the imaging industry, after all, people started with cameras, and they have been working for so many years, and they have made very practical breakthroughs in imaging technology every year, so there is nothing bad about Canon???

If one day the Canon also comes out of the Walkman; also out of the phone; It's also out of the electronic watch, I still won't buy !!