The other party promised to give money, but he didn t give money afterwards, and mentioned that he w

Hello, the other party agreed, but did not give the words in this case afterwards, indicating that the other party is not honest, so you can hold the other party responsible.

If you only have a verbal agreement, this has no legal effect, you have to ask him to sign a note, promising to give you money within a month or half a month, if you don't give it to you, you can sue.

Remember that the verbal agreement can be broken at any time, and you can only maintain your bottom line, and you can't let others lead you by the nose.

It can be seen that the other party doesn't want to give you money, he wants to play a scoundrel, he will treat you like this, no matter what, you must negotiate with him well, as long as you reason with him, I believe he will understand.

If the other party doesn't give you money, it must be a very excessive behavior, and you must ask him for this money, because this money is your own child after all, and the money must be asked.

Words count. Since money was promised, it should be given. If you don't give it, you can go to him and ask for it, if he is vexatious, you can take two people, and he won't dare.

At this time, if there is an IOU, directly sue him to repay the money, or he will stay at his house and not leave. Because this kind of borrower has no quality, you don't have to tell him about it.

He promised to give you money because he didn't keep his promise, you don't care if he asks for money too much, if he doesn't give you money or shirks, it means that his character is not good, he is lying to you.

The other party promised to give money, but he didn't mention it afterwards, so I think it's better for you to go to the court in this case.

The main thing is what is the nature of this money, and if it is justified and must be given, you should seek legal help. If it's you, I think it's better to figure out the cause of the problem.

The other party promised to give money, but did not give money afterwards, if she made excessive demands, if he still wants to harass you, it is recommended to keep the evidence and call the police.

If you meet such a person, he is a person who does not keep his word and goes back on his word. If necessary, you can take up the law to protect your legitimate rights and interests.

In my case, you'd better ask him to write a guarantee, or some other written explanation, otherwise it's baseless, because the law talks about evidence.

If the other party does not reach some of the original agreements and makes excessive demands, then you can not fulfill those obligations.

So the other party just gave you money, and didn't give money afterwards? also made a request to break up, I personally think this is very good, this is very rubbish, this person.

As soon as you promise the other party, then do what you have to do, and don't lose your word, because once this promise is broken, it will be difficult for people to trust it anymore.

This means that some excessive demands can be made, but the requirements should be in line with the parties' ability to pay, otherwise they cannot be realized.

If the other party promises to give money, but does not give money afterwards, you should take the initiative to make it clear to him, and if there is evidence, you can go to the police to deal with it.

Obviously I can't believe that he wants to blackmail you through this kind of thing. You have to leave evidence next time so that you can go through the legal process later.

How can there be so many such faceless and skinless people? It is natural to repay debts, and if it really can't be done, keep the evidence and go through the legal process.

First of all, whether there is an agreement between the two of you, and whether there is a real person, if so, you can solve this matter.

This is not good, if a person does not even have integrity, I believe that in the end there will be no good results.

Knowing this kind of scoundrel, you have no choice but to go through the legal route. You can go straight to the court and sue him.

It's better for a friend like this to cut ties with him and not contact him again.

If you have evidence in hand, you can go to court and sue him.

For such people, I think you should be careful.

I think well, it means that the person has no credit, if you don't have credit, don't pay attention to him, it's useless to do it!

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 577:Where one of the parties fails to perform its contractual obligations or its performance does not conform to the agreement, it shall bear liability for breach of contract such as continuing to perform, taking remedial measures, or compensating for losses.

Article 578:Where one of the parties expressly states or shows by its own conduct that it will not perform its contractual obligations, the other party may request that it bear liability for breach of contract before the expiration of the performance period.

Article 579:Where one of the parties fails to pay the price, remuneration, rent, or interest, or fails to perform other monetary debts, the other party may request payment from the other party.

Article 580:Where one of the parties fails to perform a non-monetary debt or the performance of a non-monetary debt does not conform to the agreement, the other party may request performance, except in any of the following circumstances:

1) Unable to perform de jure or de facto, (2) the subject matter of the debt is not suitable for compulsory performance or the cost of performance is too high, and (3) the creditor fails to request performance within a reasonable period of time.

Where there are any of the exceptions provided for in the preceding paragraph, resulting in the inability to achieve the purpose of the contract, the people's court or arbitration institution may, at the request of the parties, terminate the contractual rights and obligations, but this does not affect the assumption of liability for breach of contract. Void hole old.

or should have foreseen the possibility of a breach of contract.

Summary. If you do not admit it, you can take the evidence of the money and file a lawsuit in the court to ask for it to be returned, or to fulfill the obligations of the other party.

If you do not admit it, you can take the evidence of the money and file a lawsuit in the court to ask for it to be returned, or to fulfill the obligations of the other party.

According to the law, if the two parties have money exchanges in debt or contractual relationship, or when the transaction is made, one party fails to perform its obligations after receiving the funds, which is a breach of contract and needs to return the funds in accordance with the spirit of the contract.

The litigation process is as follows: 1. The parties submit a statement of claim in the court with accompanying evidence. 2. The court hears and files the case and notifies the defendant. 3, ** pronounced judgment, 4, the defendant fulfilled the content of the judgment.

Legal Analysis:1The payer completes the initial burden of proof, and it is recommended to collect evidence as soon as possible to prove the existence of the loan relationship, and then file a lawsuit with the court to demand that the other party repay the money.

Specific evidence includes the parties' statements, documentary evidence, physical evidence, audio-visual materials, electronic data, witness testimony, and appraisal opinions. 2.If the legal form of IOU or receipt is overturned, the payee shall bear the burden of proof.

Legal basis: Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: Materials that can be used to prove the facts of a case are all evidence. Evidence includes:

1) Physical evidence; 2) documentary evidence;

3) witness testimony;

4) Victim statements;

5) Confessions and justifications of criminal suspects or defendants;

6) Appraisal opinions;

7) Records of inquests, inspections, identifications, investigative experiments, and so forth;

8) Audio-visual materials and electronic data. Evidence must be verified to be true before it can be used as the basis for a verdict.

Legal analysis: see if there is proof of the relationship between the loan and the loan, and if there is evidence, you can sue. Litigation and application for enforcement.

Legal basis: Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Private Lending Cases》 Article 1 The term "private lending" as used in these Provisions refers to the act of financing between natural persons, legal persons and unincorporated organizations. These Provisions do not apply to disputes arising from the issuance of loans and other related financial services of financial institutions and their branches established with the approval of the financial regulatory authorities to engage in loan business.

Article 2 When a lender files a private loan lawsuit with the people's court, it shall provide proof of creditor's rights such as IOUs, receipts, and IOUs, as well as other evidence that can prove the existence of the legal relationship between the lenders. Where the creditor's rights vouchers such as IOUs, receipts, and IOUs held by the parties do not indicate the creditor, and the parties holding the creditor's rights vouchers file a private lending lawsuit, the people's court shall accept it. If the defendant raises a factual defense against the plaintiff's creditor, and the people's court finds that the plaintiff does not have the qualifications to be a creditor, it rules to dismiss the lawsuit.

Article 24: Where the borrower and the borrower have not agreed on interest, and the lender claims to pay interest, the people's court will not support it. Where the agreement on interest in loans between natural persons is unclear, and the lender claims to pay interest, the people's court will not support it. Except for loans between natural persons, where the agreement between the borrower and the lender on the loan interest is unclear, and the lender claims the interest, the people's court shall determine the interest based on the content of the private loan contract and on the basis of factors such as the local or the parties' transaction methods, trading habits, and market interest rates.

Legal analysis: Tongyu can call the police to deal with it, and if the negotiation fails, it can be sued.

Legal basis: Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 17: Basic level people's courts have jurisdiction over first-instance civil cases, except as otherwise provided for in this Law.

Article 18: Intermediate people's courts have jurisdiction over the following first-instance civil cases:

1) Major foreign-related cases;

2) Cases that have a major impact in the jurisdiction;

3) The Supreme People's Court has first learned of cases that have been determined to be under the jurisdiction of the Intermediate People's Court.

Article 119:Prosecution must meet the following requirements:

1) The plaintiff is a citizen, legal person, or other organization that has a direct interest in the case;

2) There is a clear defendant;

3) There are specific litigation claims, facts, and reasons;

4) It is within the scope of civil litigation accepted by the people's court and the jurisdiction of the people's court receiving the lawsuit.

Legal analysis: You can report to the police, and if the negotiation fails, you can sue.

Legal basis: Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 17: Basic level people's courts have jurisdiction over first-instance civil cases, except where this Law provides otherwise.

Article 18: Intermediate people's courts have jurisdiction over the following first-instance civil cases:

1) Major foreign-related cases;

2) Cases that have a major travel impact in the jurisdiction;

3) Cases over which the Supreme People's Court determines that the Intermediate People's Court has jurisdiction.

Article 100: Article 19: The following conditions must be met for prosecution:

1) The plaintiff is a citizen, legal person, or other organization that has a direct interest in the case;

2) There is a clear defendant;

3) There are specific litigation claims, facts, and reasons;

4) It is within the scope of civil litigation accepted by the people's court and the jurisdiction of the people's court receiving the lawsuit.

Summary. Hello dear! Now for you, <>

From a legal point of view: this can only be regarded as a verbal breach of contract, and relevant evidence can be collected to negotiate or report to the police. If one of the parties fails to perform its contractual obligations or the performance of its contractual obligations does not conform to the agreement, it shall bear the liability for breach of contract such as continuing to perform, taking remedial measures or compensating for losses.

What if someone promised to give money but didn't give it.

Hello dear! Now for you, <>

From a legal point of view: this can only be regarded as a verbal breach of contract, and relevant evidence can be collected to negotiate or report to the police. If one of the parties fails to perform its obligations under the contract or the performance of its obligations does not conform to the agreement, it shall bear the liability for breach of contract such as continuing to perform, taking remedial measures, or compensating for losses.

Legal basis: Article 578 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Where one of the parties clearly states or shows by its own behavior that it does not perform its obligations under the contract, the other party may request it to bear liability for breach of contract before the expiration of the performance period. Article 579:Where one of the parties fails to pay the price, remuneration, rent, or interest, or fails to perform other monetary debts, the other party may request payment from the other party.

Hello, I would like to ask if I was working for someone else, and I didn't give 4,000 at the checkout, but I was going to say that I gave me 4,000, what should I do like this.

I didn't give you the money, but I said that I had already given it to you, dear.

Yes. Then he said that there were witnesses, and I called the witnesses, and I also said that I didn't give them.

So what should I do?

It is a pro who can go through the legal process.

Can I call the police.

Is the witness willing to prove to you?

Yes, yes, dear, yes, only witnesses can prove it, dear.

Summary. What should I do if I gave the money and the other party said that I didn't give it.

Was it cash or money transfer at that time?

The borrowed money has been repaid, the IOU has been destroyed, and the other party says that it has not been repaid, what should I do?

At that time, it was given in cash.

In this case, you can look for the call history and recall the day you gave him the money.

For example, what clothes he wore, what time he gave him, help him remember.

Maybe he forgot, help him remember the scene of the day.

Everything is useless, he scolds people every day.

What legal means do I have to go through to protect my rights and interests?

In this case, you can find the local police station and call the other party over to mediate together, the police station mediated uselessly, he didn't have an IOU, because it was destroyed at that time, did you tell the police station that he harassed you every day.

When the police station came, his family was scolding, and the police station arranged it and left.

Prosecute him for malice concealment.