-
In your case, I highly recommend you to buy a quasi-professional portable computer such as LX5, G12, P7000, XZ-1 ......
SLR is a system, and if you play it, you will find that the financial resources and energy required to achieve a certain effect are far beyond what you pay when you are using the machine.
You say that you play simply, in fact, you only buy a DSLR set, and the effect may not be better than DC, and you have to pay a lot more energy to play SLR, and taking pictures with SLR is not as good as DC.
Of course, there is a big gap between the LX5 and the SLR, but in a sunny day, the gap will be small. It has all the manual support to study in introductory photography, and it's really small and convenient.
Of course, it's not against you taking the road of photography, it's just that I've been walking this road for two years and still standing still, and I feel that this road is really tiring. You enter this door and you find that there are things that you really have to add, and there are more and more of them. Many veteran SLR players have written articles like "Do You Really Need a DSLR", which is a new road and is best to take a look.
In the end, the D3100 is much better than the D3000, so if you want to buy it, you should buy this. There is naturally room for price reduction, but it is small and not necessarily worth the wait.
-
If the requirements are not high, D3000 is enough, the imaging quality of the SLR is not known to be many times better than the card machine, you will know it after using it. D3100's camera function is better, but it's basically useless, take pictures, what do you do with it?
-
The 3100 is also a new machine, and the price is not high, so it will not be loose for the time being.
The positioning of the 3100 is the replacement of the 3000, and the 3000 will be discontinued in the future.
So let's spend a few more dollars on 3100.
When 3100 drops to the ideal price, maybe 3200 will come again ......
-
Above is a blog post of mine that compares the 3000 and 3100 in more detail.
I'm not going to be a copy party, hehe.
It is recommended that you choose 3100, spend some extra silver, and you will not regret it.
-
Definitely 3100. Digital products, buy new not old. 3100 beats 3000 in all indicators
-
Both of these are regretted Save up and buy a good one.
-
Introduce 60 and 105, you decide for yourself.
The AF-S VR Macro Nikkor 105mm F IF-ED Lens is the world's first macro lens with a Quiet Ultrasonic Wave Motor (SWM) and Stabilization (VR) system, launched by Nikon on February 21, 2006.
It also includes a range of Nikon's advanced optical technologies and features, such as Nano crystal coating, ultra-low dispersion (ED) glass, and internal focus (IF).
This lens can be used with Nikon DX format digital cameras and 35mm format film cameras.
This 105mm macro lens comes with SWM, IF and VR systems to meet the needs of the user.
SWM brings quiet, high-speed autofocus, as well as fast transitions between autofocus and manual operation.
The IF system also offers a non-rotating lens front part for easier use of circular polarizing filters.
With the Modified VR System (VRII), the photographer can shoot sharp images at shutter speeds that are approximately 4 stops slower* than normal [approx. 3 m to infinity (1 30x reproduction ratio)]. In close-up situations, the detrimental effects of camera shake are greatly increased, which greatly affects the sharpness of the image. Nikon's VR technology has improved the performance of macro Nikkor lenses, providing the sharpness of VR for the first time and improving handheld close-up performance.
In addition, VRII provides a stable viewfinder image that makes framing and framing when shooting at high magnification.
The AF-S 60mm ED is a new lens that has recently been launched to replace the AFD version of the 60 Micro, and Nikon has put enough material into this lens. The portrait effect is not as good as 105.
Focal length: 60 mm
Maximum aperture: f
Minimum aperture: f 32
Lens construction: 12 elements in 9 groups (1 ED lens, 2 aspherical lenses, 1 nanocrystalline coating assembly).
Viewing angle: 39°40' (Nikon DX format: 26°30')
Minimum focusing distance: approx. m
Maximum replication ratio: 1:1
Number of diaphragm blades: 9 (round).
Filter Accessory size: 62 mm
Diameter Length: (extension from the lens mount) approx. 73 89 mm
Weight: approx. 425 g
Accessories: 62mm Quick Button Front Lens Cap LC62, Rear Lens Cap LF-1, Lens Hood HB-42, Soft Lens Pocket CL-1018.
-
If you are not an experienced photographer, macro is not recommended to use a cheap manual head, in fact, it is very expensive to shoot macro and portrait lenses.
It is recommended to go directly to "Baiwei", and make a one-time investment without regrets for life. When you buy this head and which one to match, it is better to put the money in place at one time, and it is not much more, even if you don't want to get out of the high-end lens, it will maintain its value.
-
new 60. It can also be used as a portrait head, ** not high but practical. 105 is a bit expensive.
-
Tangled D3000 vs D3100? Wood has a god horse to be entangled, all of them are entry machines, and make a stronger d90.
In comparison between the two, the latter is more suitable for the requirements of the question. >>>More
18-55mm means that the focal length is 18 to 55 mm.
You should still have the words in this shot. >>>More
These things can only be summed up in one sentence: "you get what you pay for"! >>>More
SLRs have a larger format than EMR sensors, which is the most obvious benefit. When the light is low, such as at night, when the indoor lights are dim, the same light, the same lens, aperture, shutter parameters. When it reaches the sensor, a camera with a larger sensor receives more light, and with the same pixels, you can use a lower sensitivity to achieve less noise**.
1. If you are not ready to upgrade in the future, you are ready to play the setback. It is to say goodbye to DC and pursue a little petty bourgeoisie. Choose Pentax's kr 3800 yuan or so, the sleeve performance is good, the machine performance is also very good, just because Pentax has a small audience and a small lens group, and the later upgrade is more expensive! >>>More