Why can t AMD4400 shine the performance of the 9800GT, what CPU does it need, and what is the differ

No points. The GPU performance of the 9800GT can be said to be quite strong, why does a good graphics card need a good processor. Because when it comes to graphics processing, the GPU still can't work independently of the processor, and the processor has to distribute the work, although the main computing graphics card can do it.

Therefore, the graphics card is always in the stage of waiting for the division of labor, and the performance will definitely not be played.

Similar processors, 6000+, large L2 cache, high frequency, bus width, do you need to explain specifically.

The 2 are about the same, but the AMD4400+ has a higher frequency, and it is also a large program, and the CPU usage will be a little less than that of E2200.

Of course, E2200 has strong performance, first of all, E2200 is a core architecture, and AMD 4400+ is a K8 architecture, K8 is several years earlier than Core, and AMD4400 and Intel's 2160 is a level, 2160 The main frequency is and 2200 is the main frequency, AMD4400 and the main frequency is greater than 2200, but the performance is far inferior to 2200, and the two are dozens of dollars worse in price, saying that AMD4400 is about to be off the market.

4400+ is AMD's very old dual-core CPU,It should be a product of 08 years,Power consumption is relatively high,Performance is definitely not good for today's games,The key is that there is basically no brand new。

Meijie's motherboard is cheaper and supports AMD for about 300 yuan, and the better point is to buy the Gigabyte 770 without integrated graphics or 780 with integrated graphics.

ASUS M3A78-CM 780G.

The price is not expensive and the workmanship is very good. It can be upgraded later.

There is an integrated graphics card that can be used to increase performance by up to 40% if you have an A-card

NF520A is fine, and there is no advantage if it is high.

The P4 is single-core and the AMD4400+ is dual-core.

Neither of them will work!

If you really want to compare, of course, the AMD4400+ performance is better!

It is recommended that you buy AMD X2 BE-2450 (65nm) dual-core low power consumption, main frequency, enough!

At first glance, 4400+ is definitely better, one is single-core, and the other is dual-core. But sometimes dual-core is not necessarily better than single-core, for example, some long-threaded computing single-core is better, but now dual-core is getting better and better, and there is no comparison.

It's long outdated. Now they have entered the multi-core era, and the dual-core configuration is the lowest. Whether it's power consumption or performance, AMD4400+ is better, and CPUs like P4 that have been discontinued early may not be in stock on the market, and 4400+ will be completely delisted soon.

If you can't maximize the performance of the 9800GT by default, you must at least overclock to the above.

No problem. Besides, the 5200 has a lot of overclocking potential, so don't worry.

3DMark 06 9800GT Performance reaches 13000 points by default, which is considered capped, 5200 should be at 11000 12000 by default, you can try to overclock, just reach 12000+, don't add too much chip voltage. 45nm easy to shrink voltage control The following system is good and can go up to 4G

Yes, no problem, hehe, I can also play 9400gt fully, you should be able to play.

The correlation between the graphics card and the CPU is not very significant.

The development speed of the CPU has exceeded the development speed of the PC, so the CPU is basically not the bottleneck of the computer, just take a 500 quick money CPU to cope with most of the games and daily office entertainment, that is just now! 2140 positioning is about 500 low-end dual-core, mainly for AMD's ATHLON 643600+ 3800+ 4000+ AMD4400+ positioning in the mid-range and buckle meat E4400 is inferior to the bottom As for you use AMD4400+ to enter the kart fast This problem is one-sided Because it is also related to the system and chipset Of course, AMD's CPU gameplay is indeed stronger than Intel's The reason is none other than AMD's CPU integrated memory controller The data is no longer exchanged directly between the CPU and the memory through the North Bridge, which accelerates the transfer of data and the control of the memory, but because Intel's buckle meat 2 has added a new instruction set, it is better than AMD in terms of audio-visual entertainment It can be said that the two have their own merits, even like AMD, even a meal, even like to play games, haha

The performance is comparable to that of the Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 processor, and the parameters of both are as follows:

AMD Athlons 64 x2 4400+ Parameters:

Applicable Type: Desktop;

CPU series: Athlon 64 x2;

CPU Frequency: ;

Slot Type: Socket Am2;

Number of pins: 940pin;

Number of cores: Dual cores;

Thermal Design Power (TDP): 65.

Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 Parameters:

Applicable Type: Desktop;

CPU series: Core 2 Duo E4000;

CPU Frequency: ;

Slot Type: LGA 775;

Number of pins: 775pin;

Number of cores: Dual cores;

Number of threads: Double-threaded.

AMD4400+ is equivalent to Core in terms of performance, which processor actually has its own strengths! AMD has the advantage of HT bus architecture and memory controllers! Outstanding performance in floating-point arithmetic!

And the core series! The advantage is in stable compatibility and super multi-** processing!

If you want to talk about a core product with similar performance to 4400+, it is the core2 duo e4300!

The e2140 is actually a Pentium processor that uses the core microarchitecture! In terms of performance, it is not as good as PD 925 dual-core! For details, you can take a look at the performance test comparison of 4000+ PD925 and E2140 in the post!

1.Press and hold the "Delete" key or "F2" key when rebooting or booting up to enter the BIOS.

2.Go to the BIOS and turn down the memory frequency, and your DDRII800 will be DDRII667 or below.

3.Set the HT bus frequency to 800, which seems to be called "HT frequency" or something, and the value defaults to 1000

4.Find the "CPU Frequency" or "CPU Overclock" and one of the values is "200", that is, "External Frequency", set it to "220" or above, and your CPU will be overclocked by 10 or more. Press F8 to save the reboot.

5.It is recommended to increase the "external frequency" by 10 points each time (220, 230, 240, 250...).Repeat step 4 and grope for the highest frequency of your CPU. Main frequency: Outer frequency, multiplier.

6.If the boot fails, load the BIOS to load the default settings.

default settings", or see the instruction manual to jumper to empty the motherboard BIOS

Principle: Because the frequency of memory and HT increases correspondingly after the external frequency is increased, it cannot work after a certain amplitude. So turn them all down. In this way, the external frequency and main frequency can be greatly increased.

Recommended setting: Set the HT bus frequency to 800

Memory frequency 667

External frequency 230 250 (depending on your CPU's constitution and heat dissipation).

If you're just playing, set it to 220 and guarantee 0 risk.

Voltage auto

That's how I used this method to overrun the 36000 external frequency to 250, and I didn't need to set the voltage.

Also, you'd better get a better heatsink. It is recommended to replace it with a small tower heatsink with two heat pipes, such as the Red Sea of Overclocking 3 and the Beta of Kyushu Fengshen. 60 70 yuan apiece.

Overclocking is in the motherboard's BIOS, and it has nothing to do with the CPU. It depends on what motherboard it is! If you pass the English test, it's basically not much of a problem!

It's a lot stronger, but if you change Intel's CPU, you have to change the motherboard, so don't waste it if it's enough.

Pure waste of money.

Although the performance has been improved, it is meaningless, and overclocking is used first.

In the future, it is wise to go directly to the 4 cores.

The interface is different, and it can't be changed....Speed Changer 620 bar....

It's not a question of wasting money, it's a question of him not being able to change it at all.