AMD3800 Why is the price drop so fast

There is no bad performance.

The speed of development of CPUs is changing with each passing day, far from what we can believe, and the market has changed dramatically without understanding hardware for a month. 3600+ and 3800+ are the high-end products of AMD Athlons in 2006, and by the first half of 2007, they became the mainstream configuration, and in the second half of the year, 4000+ became the mainstream CPU of about 400 yuan, and 3600+ and 3800+ have dropped to the cost price of about 400 yuan, and they had to be discontinued and delisted. AMD has long ceased to produce these two CPU retail products, and there are currently two types of goods on the market, one is the retail version of the inventory, and the other is the 90nm inventory for OEMs.

In the past, OEM computer manufacturers had rebate treatment, and the more they sold, the higher the rebate, so they had inventory. Now AMD3600+ and 3800+ are back out,**Extremely low,3600+ loose pieces are only about 260 yuan,Close to single-core**,This is also what AMD itself does not want to see,Especially after the launch of Shanlong 2100+ this year,3600+The return to the market can be described as killing 1000,Self-loss 800,Robbing their own CPU market。

These two U, whether they are 90nm or 65nm, are good U, and the overclocking performance is excellent, so you can buy them with confidence.

Moreover, AMD and Intel have different policies. Intel is able to carry out product operation and strategy at the same time, that is, whenever there is a model of the first model, it will promote the reduction of the old product, and when the price of the old product is reduced, there will be the first product to make up for its original price. Although AMD's Athlon64 X2 series has X frequency doubling technology to serve the refinement of the product line, it is helpless due to the strong pressure of Intel, and it was at an overall disadvantage in 2007.

Because the new performance, better and more cost-effective came out. In order to make way for the new one, the only way to clear the inventory is to reduce the price, so that the new one can enter its current price, and if it is not lowered, who will buy it? At the same time, the opponent Intel is not a vegetarian.

3800+ is really good.

It's that AMD as a whole keeps cutting prices.

Because the listing of Intel Core suppressed AMD

AMD only has a price reduction for the market.

3800 is good.

Because the CPU updates are too fast. Yours is almost gone. This is true for both computers and mobile phones.

The 620 of 3800+ is not a good deal but it is not a loss, and the market demand of 3600+ is very large, so it has risen.

See if your case is too dusty, clean it up, blow the fan too, and the heat dissipation is not good.

Reapply some silicone grease or replace it with a heat sink.

Your other things are bottlenecks, so the overall score of the test is low, in addition, the strong key hail suggests that the landlord do not use software such as Super Rabbit or Optimization Master to measure the score, these things are too bad, and the test draft will make you very depressed.

His hardware is not well matched.

Wow click. Great value! It's a software issue. Hehehe!

It's a problem with the CPU driver, or a problem with the motherboard BIOS.

1 full processor. Check it out with AMD Dual-Core Patch!

We can also set the modification from Windows, currently only XP and 2003 support the modification method is: click Start Run (Win+R), enter MSCconfig. Select the Advanced Don't tick the numproc(n) option, reboot the system, and you can change back to dual-core.

2.Reinstall the system.

Check the model number of the CPU with Everest. Reinstall the system. Play AMD dual-core patch.

Is the software up to date? See how it looks in the BIOS.

If you can go up, you can go up, three or two hundred dollars.

3800+ definitely can't afford to bring 4870. It is estimated that 6000+ is barely enough, but it is better than 3800+.

So the old motherboard is super hairy frequency, so that you dare not mislead people, you can't just look at the main frequency The processor performance is not determined by this This is a deceptive thing It is better to look at this than the external frequency.

I think if you want to upgrade, it's in place at one time.,It's time to change to a new interface in the future.,AMD, you choose a 7750 with the same performance and less power consumption, you change the card and don't play the large stand-alone machine, it's not going to be smooth when the CPU usage is high。

...Upgrade the 7750 AM2 board is compatible with AM2+ CPUs. Please provide a specific model number.

It's worth it, 4870 graphics card with 3800 U is the bottleneck.

A lot of difference! Especially in terms of parallel multitasking, there will be a significant improvement in the game side! Here's a screenshot of my actual parameters!

1. AMD3800+ CPU frequency, L2 512K L2 cache, single-core 64-bit processor, power consumption 45W, production process.

2. AMD5000+ CPU frequency, dual-core 64-bit processor, L2 L2 2*512K, production process, power consumption 65W.

From the perspective of the performance of the two, the AMD5000+ CPU is a dual-core CPU, with the main frequency, and the theoretical running speed is more than twice the running speed of the AMD3800+ CPU.

3800+ and 5000+ both belong to the AM2 series, K8 architecture, as for the 90nm or 65nm impact can be ignored.

The only difference between them is that one is 2G and the other is! The rest can be understood as all the same.

They are more completely comparable, how much more efficient? It's a simple math problem.

The performance should be 30% faster, and the work of 3800+ running for 100 seconds can be completed in 5000+ 70 seconds.

5000+ was boxed at 370 a few days ago, and now it's going crazy, it's not recommended to buy it, consider 8450 or 7750.

You're updating it anyway.,Don't buy a pair of eight-point pants.,I think even the structure has been changed.,Just buy K10's 8450 three-core pterodactyl.。

What does performance look like? Some people say that it is three 4200+ put together, and I actually feel that it can be compared to three 5000+ put together.

No need, all 3 of my machines are amd, including a laptop.

5000+ is just a high frequency, and a high frequency is helpful for a single program to run. However, it is basically only reflected in the score of the test software.

However, the 5000+ black box is better than overclocking, if you don't overclock, it's not necessary.

I don't actually feel it or anything.

ps: Your 3800+ casual overpoint will reach the level of 5000+.

Below I am 3600+ Xiaochao**

I don't feel the difference in everyday applications.

The eleventh episode of the tour of the Difu Taizong returned to the soul of the melon and fruit Liu Quan continued to match the twelfth Tang King Bingcheng Cultivation Conference Guanyin sanctified the golden cicada.

Hello! AMD Athlon3800+ dual-core CPU, although it can't be said to be top-of-the-line, but at that time AMD CPU was considered good. Four years ago there were two, one was the CPU of the Athlon's XP 2500+.

Because it's a CPU with very good overclocking capabilities and capabilities. There is also a 3800+ model that is considered high. The process also breaks through the micrometer and enters the nano process.

Then there was the ATHLON 64x2 CPU, which was the AMD 4000+.

At that time, the CPU of 3800+ was due to the difference of about 720 yuan in various places. A friend of mine has a Lenovo brand machine, and the CPU is 3800+ with a total **6,000 ah. Indeed, the speed of hardware updates you said is really too fierce, and last year 09 alone is too much to mention.

My two-year-old machine is also about to become an entry-level machine. Hehe. So if you want to change the configuration, remember that you must not have time requirements for the hardware, as long as it can meet your requirements, the performance is reasonable.

1. Four years ago, AMD Athlon Dual-Core 3800+ was an entry-level CPU.

2. AMD Athlon dual-core 3800+ is positioned at the antique level in the current CPU ranking.

3, and AMD Athlon-Dual-Core 3800+ is already very old, and its performance is not as good as the new dual-core G3220.

3800+ top four years ago? Just kidding! The 3200+ at the end of 07 was rubbish, and at that time, Intel's dual-core was basically popular.

3800+ is medium at most, it's not that the update is fast, but some relatively low-end products are eliminated quickly, you look at the high-end ones, the ones that are eliminated so quickly!

Not considered top-notch. At first, it seemed a little more than 800. Well, there are 6 cores and 8 cores, so hurry up and change them. My AMD 630 is not bad, 4-core small overclocking, enough, it's even cooler to add a graphics card. Recommend the 3A platform, cost-effective.

It's very good, probably not mistaken, about 700 yuan has been sold. I don't know any more. Now even the X2 215 at the lowest end of 45nm is better than him.