D90orD5100, the choice for entry level SLRs

The machine either buys D90, mid-range, the most cost-effective operating machine at present, or buys D3100, the picture quality is about the same, cheap is the last word. Of course, the D3000 is the same, but the D3200 and D5200 are not recommended. The lens cost performance is 50 >18-55> and 1000 nods.

There's an extra motor. The 18-55 is only 600, but the image quality is very good, especially the sharpness, but it doesn't pull the wind, the focal length is short, and the performance of the 18-end is better than that of the 18-105. Since it is the cheapest pullover, many people dislike it.

50 Any brand of 50 is the cheapest. 18-105 is a little longer and practical, and 18-200 is completely rubbish. If you want to contact the operation, there is no money, it is recommended to buy d90+50 If you pat d3100+50 Why is the zoom matched, it should be a discount for the set, hehe, you 4000 machine + 1500 lens to buy together only 5000, which is equivalent to only 1000 lenses.

Then when I bought the set, I returned the UV and added 100 200 for a better CPL. More on that later.

The first two are fine, and the third one needs to be focused manually, so be careful.

If you consider burning the lens in the later stage, it is D90, because of the body motor, it is more convenient and affordable to match the lens.

If you don't upgrade, it's still D5100, and if you want 50 fixed focus, there is also 50, ** and 35 is about the same.

It's not easy for students to play DSLR, but in your current situation (mainly money), I'd like to give you a little advice.

On the reverse side of the fuselage, I recommend you to go to the D90, because beginner and intermediate are not the same concept after all, and I believe you won't just stop at just clicking the shutter, right?

On the reverse side of the lens, I have a little conflict with your three plans, I don't know if you have played SLR before, anyway, I think it is not very good for novices to play SLR from only one prime lens. I know you probably want a good bokeh effect, but I think novices should practice zoom lenses more, learn the shooting techniques of each focal length, try the effect of each focal length, see which focal length they are most satisfied with, and then decide if you need to add a prime lens.

In terms of lenses, my suggestion is to put on an 18-105 sleeve in the early stage, with a wide focal length, which is enough for you. If the budget is really tight, you can also go on the 18-55 set. It's not too late to be on 50 in the late stage.

D90 and D5100 basically do not belong to the same grade of the body, although D90 is an old machine, but its performance is incomparable to the current entry-level SLR. The D90 has not been discontinued, so let's get one. The D7000 is a lot more expensive than the D90, but the difference in performance between them is negligible for the price difference.

In fact, the D90 plus one lens is enough for you to shoot for several years.

The head you said is 50 This fixed focus head is very practical Just choose the second set It feels good Very practical If you still have the budget, add a zoom head Travel with 18 105 You can make up for it There are meters can also be on 18 200 I feel that this configuration starts very well Welcome old birds Pat.

If you want to upgrade in the future, it is recommended to enter Canon, because the low-end n high-end C.

In terms of lenses: Canon's EF lenses have a large chain of applications, and the image quality of the L-series lenses in the EF lens has reached the point of impeccable. However, the image quality of Canon's EF-S lens is very different from that of EF lenses, so I joined Canon and tried to upgrade EF lenses as much as possible after getting started.

Another point is that Canon is an all-electronic lens adapter, the failure rate and wear are very small, and the lens comes with its own motor, so Canon's focusing speed is super fast, especially the annular ultrasonic motor is super silent and super fast.

In terms of fuselage: Canon's self-developed CMOS and DigiC image processing systems are Canon's cutting-edge technologies, and the quality is extremely high.

If you don't want to upgrade later, go for Nikon.

In terms of fuselage:Nikon is full of materials on low-end machines、Solid workmanship,It seems to be a special change in the industry,Bright and good,But **Slightly expensive,CMOS purchased from Sony and Nikon's own image processing system is also very good。

Lenses: The difference between the low-end and high-end of the lens group is not very big, only in terms of aperture size, color, and distortion, but ** is higher than that of Canon.

The processing channel of the Canon 500D is 14bit, and the Nikon's D5000 and D90 are 12bit, and in terms of detail, the Canon is better than the Nikon.

Home, landscapes, things, just the D5000 and D90 are brightly colored, beautiful, and sharpness is very good (but the result of in-camera sharpening).

In terms of lenses, Canon's low-end lenses are poor, but they offer great value for money, and the high-end head, as mentioned above, is the best. Nikon's lenses, whether they are high-end or low-end, are still at a very high level overall (at least Nikon's low-end is better than Canon's).

Generally, it is good to use the sleeve first, familiarize yourself with the camera first, and then configure the lens accordingly according to your needs.

Another point, if you want to add other focal length lenses in the future, try not to go to the sub-factory, because they are not compatible with some functions of the body, and the method of eliminating violet light and blue light is used to reduce the dispersion of the lens, and finally the image color is yellowish and the color restoration cannot be done. In short, you will regret it after buying it.