How to prove that f x is symmetrical with f x with respect to the y axis

Updated on educate 2024-04-14
14 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    To prove the symmetry of two images, we must first show that the symmetry of each point on the y=f(x) image with respect to the y-axis is on the y=f(-x) image.

    Therefore, it is necessary to set (for y=f(x) to any point, then y0=f(x0), (the symmetry point about the y-axis is (, satisfying y0=f(-(x0)), and explain (on the image of y=f(-x). So the symmetry point of each point on the y=f(x) image with respect to the y-axis is on the y=f(-x) image. In the same way, it can be proved that the symmetry of each point on the y=f(-x) image with respect to the y-axis is also on the y=f(x) image, so the two-function image is symmetrical with respect to the y-axis.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    i.e. prove f(x) = f(-x).

    I'm sorry, but what the guys above said is to prove the symmetry of the origin.

    Abstract functions can only be proved by f(x)=f(-x), which can be proved by periodicity, reductivity, etc.

    There are many more ways to prove specific functions. Most of the proofs about y-axis symmetry, that is, even functions, will not be directly proved, the most common and practical method is the periodic proof, about the y-axis symmetry function has a period of 0, you can extend it, as long as you use the proof method of the periodic function, it is no problem to prove the function on the y-axis.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    f(x)=f(-x), the function image is symmetrical with respect to the y-axis for the following reasons:

    With respect to y-axis symmetry, the ordinates are equal, the abscissa is the opposite of each other, f(x), f(-x) are the ordinates of the points on the function image, and f(x)=f(-x) are equal.

    x and -x are the abscissa of the points on the function image, and x and -x are opposite to each other, so their images are symmetrical with respect to the y axis!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    In order to prove the symmetry of two images, we must first show that the symmetry of y=f(x) is on y=f(x) image, and the symmetry point of y-axis is on y=f(-x) image.

    If you want to set (for y=f(x) at any point, then y0=f(x0), (the symmetry point about the y-axis is (, satisfying y0=f(-(x0)), and the description (on the image of y=f(-x).) So the symmetry point of each point on the y=f(x) image with respect to the y-axis is on the y=f(-x) image. In the same way, it can be proved that the symmetry of each point on the y=f(-x) image with respect to the y-axis is also on the y=f(x) image, so the two-function image with respect to the y-axis is called by the Zen Hu Shi.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Since f(-x) and f(x) are symmetrical with respect to the y-axis, i.e., f(x) is symmetrical with respect to the y-axis, and because f(x) and g(x) have symmetry points with respect to the y-axis, then the image of f(x) symmetrical with respect to the y-axis has an intersection point with g(x), that is, f(-x) has an intersection point with g(x).

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It might be helpful to review the definition of even function f(-x) = f(x). A point symmetrical with respect to the y-axis means a mirror point with respect to the y-axis. That is, if y1 = f(-x) and y2 = g(x), symmetry with respect to y-axis means y1 = y2, i.e. f(-x) = g(x).

    Note that the x here is just a point greater than zero.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The definition of the even function f(-x) = f(x) may be helpful. A point symmetrical with respect to the y-axis means a mirror point with respect to the y-axis. That is, if y1 = f(-x) and y2 = g(x), symmetry with respect to y-axis means y1 = y2, i.e. f(-x) = g(x).

    Note that the x here is just a point greater than zero.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The image of f(-x) and f(x) is symmetrical with respect to the y-axis.

    In the title, it is known that f(x) and g(x) have a point about y-axis symmetry, that is, f(-x) and g(x) have a common point, that is, there is an intersection point. Hope.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    This should make high school. The math teacher thinks a lot.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    If the function f(x) is symmetric with respect to x=2 and t=2 (with a period of 2), we can derive the property of f(x) with respect to the y-axis symmetry by following the following steps.

    1.The function is symmetrical with respect to x=2:

    For arbitrary x, if f(x) exists, then f(x+4) = f(x). This is because the period is 2, so f(x+2) and f(x) have the same value as brightness.

    Specifically, when x=2, we have f(2+2)=f(4)=f(2), which means that the function has the same value as x=2 at x=4.

    2.Derive f(x) with respect to y-axis symmetry:

    Since the function f(x) is symmetrical with respect to x=2, i.e., f(2+h)=f(2-h) is permeated by any h.

    If we define a new variable y=x-2 (i.e., move the x-axis in the original coordinate system to x=2), then the original function f(x) becomes g(y)=f(y+2).

    We can further express the symmetry of g(y) as: g(h) = g(-h) holds for any h.

    Now let's look at the symmetry of g(y) with respect to the y-axis:

    When y=h, g(h) = g(h+(-2)) g(h-(-2)) g(-h).

    This means that the function g(y) is symmetrical with respect to the y-axis, that is, the function f(x) is symmetric with respect to the y-axis.

    To sum up, based on the properties of the function f(x) symmetrical with respect to x=2 and t=2, we can conclude that f(x) is symmetric with respect to the y-axis.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    f(x) is symmetrical with respect to x=2 and t=2, how do you get that f(x) is off and symmetrical on the y axis?

    f(x) for the symmetrical chaotic celery of x=2, then f(2+x)=f(2-x)t=2, f(x+2)=f(x).

    f(x)=f(2-x),f(-x)=f(2+x)f(x)=f(-x)

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    With respect to x 2 symmetry, then f(2 x) f(2 x) period is 2, then f(x) is 2) f(x) so f( e.g. return to the slag section x) f[2 (x 2)]f[2 (x 2)].

    f(x+2)=f(x)

    So about y-axis symmetry.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    This condition does not mean that there is a symmetry center of the function, but only that the half-period of the function is 1;

    f(x+1)=

    f(x)f(x+2)=

    f(x+1)=

    f(x)]=f(x)

    t=2 If you add the function even, there will be a symmetry center;

    f(x+1)=

    f(-x) replaces x with x-1 2

    f(x+1/2)=

    f(-x+1/2)

    The center of symmetry is: (1 2,0).

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Because f(a+x)=f(b-x) is true for any x.

    Therefore, the x of the above equation is unified with [x+(b-a) 2] instead of collapse.

    Get. f[(b+a) 2+x]=f[(b+a) 2-x], then f(x) is x=(b+a) 2

Related questions
12 answers2024-04-14

<> haven't done it for a long time, it's all rusty, hope.

18 answers2024-04-14

f(0+1)-f(0)=0, f(1)=f(0)=1, f(1+1)-f(1)=2, f(2)=3, you can get (0,1),(1,1),(2,3) three points set f(x)=ax 2+bx+c, and it is easy to get the answer f(x)=x 2-x+1Topics like this can make full use of the known conditions, although the questions give few conditions, in fact, it is basically a substitute thing, or you can draw a picture to help you solve the problem more vividly. In mathematics, you need to learn how to combine numbers and shapes, and some problems are basically a matter of drawing a diagram.

20 answers2024-04-14

Let f(x)=ax squared + bx+c,,, because f(0)=1, substituting 0 into c=0, that is, f(x)=ax squared + bx, and because f(x+1)=f(x)+x+1, substituting f(x)=ax squared + bx into this equation, we get ax squared + (b+1)x+1=ax squared + (2a+b)x+a+b, and the solution of a=b=b+1 from the principle of constant eqation gives a=b=one-half. Therefore, f(x) = one-half x square minus one-half x I believe that the landlord has done the second question, and I wish the landlord learning progress.

5 answers2024-04-14

The F-35 is a single-engine fighter and is inferior to the F-22 in supersonic cruisingSo it can only be commanded. But its killer is no less tight-lipped than the F-22, and VTOL can be deployed anywhere, such as islands without airfields, jungles and ships, and can surprise any unprepared aircraft flying through it. >>>More

14 answers2024-04-14

Please refer to the proof of mathematician Master Chen Jingrun... I can't prove it.