Combined with historical materialism, how to understand that everyone is a witness, a pioneer, and a

Historical materialism believes that social existence determines social consciousness, social consciousness is relatively independent, social consciousness reacts on social existence, and everyone is a witness, pioneer and builder of the new era.

If you want to combine materialism and the current theory, and call architecture a new era of pioneers, it is the inevitable product of historical development.

Just for me to die housekeeper building left, everyone is the deep creek moral forbidden open people of the advice of the war, such a gray I make a good relationship, his exaggerated heart is quietly in the open builders.

History is created by the people, and if we look at it from the concept of historical materialism, we will know that the power of the masses of the people is very powerful.

If I want to understand a person through historical materialism, I think it should be from his own ability, and I feel that the understanding will be clearer.

How do you understand historical materialism? Everyone is a witness, a pioneer, and a builder of the new era, which depends on their own experience to experience others or others, and everyone has their own creative value.

How does the joint historical materialism understand that everyone is a witness, a pioneer, and a builder of the new era? In terms of historical materialism, everyone needs to witness because they are an individual. Go to wear and wear the female construction to create.

Combined with the materialist view of history, how to understand that everyone is a witness and a pioneer of the new era, so that the materialist embassy, then what we are now is witnessing the prosperity of our great motherland!

Combined with historical materialism, how to understand that everyone is a witness and insight of the new era, because each of us participates in social practice and participates in the construction of the great motherland, so we are all witnesses and practitioners.

How to understand that a person is a witness to the creation of a new era, and what is the role of the pioneer?

Combined with historical materialism, how to understand that everyone is a witness, a pioneer and a builder of the new era, because everyone has different ideas.

Please combine the materialist view of history to understand how everyone is the pioneer of competition in the new era, and the words are mainly based on each person's mentality.

Combined with how to understand historical materialism, everyone is a witness and pioneer of the new era, which can be such a major event as this year.

Combined with historical materialism, how to understand that everyone is a witness of the new era, I think that is a correct view.

If you are a person, there is a new era that can witness the pioneer builder, then you must be a **.

and historical materialism? Everyone is a witness and a pioneer of the new era.

Historical materialism. It thinks the masses of the people.

is the creator of history, 1The masses of the people are the creators of the material wealth of society.

2.The masses of the people are the creators of the spiritual wealth of society.

3.The masses of the people are the decisive force for social change.

4.In any era, the role of the masses of the people in creating history must be constrained by historical conditions.

Social roots, class foundations and ideological origins: Economic, socio-historical conditions: development of the capitalist economy.

Class Basis and Practical Basis: The Growing Struggle of the Proletariat Against the Bourgeoisie Theories are classical German philosophy, classical political economy in England, and utopian socialism in France.

First of all, it put an end to the long domination of the idealistic view of history in the theory of social history, and for the first time placed history on its true foundation.

Secondly, it serves as a tool of human cognition, a general method for us to observe and study social and historical problems, and a guide for us to solve social and historical problems.

Finally, it unifies the Marxist outlook on nature and history on the basis of materialism, and embodies the integrity of Marxist dialectical materialism and historical materialism.

The establishment of Marxist historical materialism has completed the scientific understanding of social history in human history, defended the authority of materialism, and completely destroyed idealism in the last field. It became one of Marx's two most important contributions to humanity.

The fundamental opposition between historical materialism and idealism on the question of who is the creator of history lies in the wild key ()aWhether or not to recognize the agency of consciousness.

b.Whether or not to recognize the productive forces as the ultimate determinant of social development.

c.Whether or not to recognize the masses of the people as the creators of history, the answer is a good one.

d.Whether or not we recognize that class struggle is the most direct driving force for the development of class society?

Correct answer: c

The fundamental opposition between historical materialism and idealism on the question of who is the creator of history lies in ().

a.Whether or not to recognize which counter-effect of social consciousness.

b.Whether or not to recognize the productive forces determines the relationship between production and production.

c.Whether or not to recognize the economic base determines the superstructure.

d.Whether or not to recognize the masses of the people as the creators of history.

Correct answer: d

a.The people are the creators of history.

b.The role of the representatives of the exploiting class in the development of history.

c.The role of ideological motivation in the development of history.

d.The role of outstanding figures in the development of history.

Correct answer: The masses of the people are the creators of history.

The fundamental opposition between historical materialism and idealistic historical outlook on the question of who is the creator of history lies in the fact that historical materialism believes that the masses of people are the creators of history, while idealistic historical outlook emphasizes the role of heroic and stupid figures.

Historical materialism emphasizes that the development of social history is determined by tangible and objective conditions, and these traces are gradually formed in the process of the development of human society. Therefore, historical materialism holds that there are laws to follow in the development of history, and the creators of history are those who stand at the forefront of the times and use scientific knowledge and social theories to guide the masses of the people to advance.

The idealistic view of history believes that the development of human civilization is the result of the leadership of individual heroes, and emphasizes the role of heroes in promoting history. They believe that the key to historical progress is the thoughts and actions of outstanding people, and that this progress is the result of their contributions to society.

But in reality, both the masses of the people and heroes have played an important role in the course of history. Historical materialism holds that the historical process is a great cause consciously initiated, actively promoted, and firmly accomplished by the broad masses of the people, and that the masses of the people are the masters of history. The idealistic view of history emphasizes that heroes have played a role in promoting the historical process under specific historical conditions.

The role of outstanding figures in history is of great significance, but their achievements must also be viewed in the context of the overall development of social history.

In short, the fundamental antagonism between historical materialism and idealistic history on the issue of the creator of history lies mainly in the difference in their understanding of the laws of social and historical development. Historical materialism emphasizes the laws of society and the laws of historical development.

believes that the creator of history is the broad masses of people full of wisdom and creativity; The idealistic view of history emphasizes the merits and contributions of individual heroes. We should proceed from the general law of social and historical development, not only see the creativity of the masses of the people and the role of the masters, but also affirm the role of the thoughts and actions of heroes in promoting historical progress.

The question of the creators of history is a complex one, which involves the different roles of the masses of people and heroes in the historical process. The fundamental opposition between the materialist view of history and the idealistic view of history also shows two different methods of historical thought. Through a comprehensive grasp of the overall laws of social history, we need to affirm the role of the broad masses of the people as masters and at the same time understand the role of the thoughts and actions of heroic figures in promoting historical progress.

Only in this way can we better guide our historical research and practice.