Which is stronger, laptop CPUi9 10980HK or i9 10900K?

i9 10980xe 18 cores and 36 threads baicpu, only 10980hk eight-core sixteen-thread laptop cpu, and no 10980k model, i9 10900k ten cores and two du ten threads, zhi so if it is 10980xe is definitely good for 10900k, but 10980hk performance is not as good as 10900k, reference: the assembled computer used at home is active when 8Snap and grab.

Purchased points. Hit. Open.

Rob. <>

It must be 10900k strong, the frequency alone is higher than 10980hk, and it is used for desktops, and the performance is definitely stronger than that used for laptops.

Since the i9-10900K is a desktop processor, there is basically no need to consider energy saving and heat dissipation issues, so the performance is higher than that of the 10980HK under silent frequency.

As far as the description goes, the latter is a desktop platform, if it is a laptop platform. Limited by heat dissipation and power consumption, there is not much difference between the two. The main performance gap comes from the power supply and heat dissipation design, which is stronger, then the CPU performance is good.

This CPU requires a desktop platform to fully function.

I don't know how to continue asking, satisfied.

The CPU of the notebook i9 10980HK is naturally weaker than the i9 10900K. If you think about the heat dissipation of the notebook, as well as the power supply of the notebook, all of which limit its performance, I don't believe you can start live streaming and try playing games. The notebook was immediately stunned.

If the heat dissipation is good! In fact, the gap is not big! 10900k full load good point! Single-core is also stronger! There is no obvious gap in the normal use of notebook desktops at this level.

The former is stronger, the former is high-voltage unlimited, and the latter is standard unlimited.

The desktop version is for desktops, and laptops generally use the mobile version, and there is no comparison between the desktop version of the processor and the mobile version of the processor.

Web Links. If you have to compare, it must be the desktop version.

In fact, the processors of these two products have their own advantages and disadvantages, so I think it is also which one you want to buy, you look at this **, relatively speaking, it depends on the focus of your car.

Anyway, that's it.,You're going to talk about game performance.,i9 11900k may also beat i9 10900k (according to Intel's uselessness theory of more than 8 cores),Note,It's a small win.,It's not a big improvement.,Because the process hasn't changed.。 But if you want to talk about performance such as rendering, the specifier can't be compared, because there are two fewer physics cores. Even if Intel says that the IPC performance will increase by double digits, without a 25% increase per core, it is impossible to win the i9 10900K with 8 cores and 16 threads against the i9 10900K.

Hope mine can help you solve your problem, dear!

The difference in performance is very noticeable.

i9 10900K is still 14nm old process, Comet Lake old architecture, i7 13700K uses Raptor Lake new architecture, 10nm SF new process, the performance gap between the two single-core fiber Kai is 28%, and the multi-core Hu vertical Hu performance gap has reached 50%, in other words, the performance of i7 13700K is almost 2 times that of the pants barrier i9 10900K.

The difference is very slippery. The 13700K was released in 2022 and uses the new architecture of the Intel Scrambler RT, and the 10900K was released in 2020, and the architecture is outdated. And the number of cores and threads of 13700k is far more than 10900k, which is the benchmark of the previous generation flagship 12900ks

In terms of running scores, the i9-11900K is only about 6 7% higher than the 11980HK under silent frequency, and the single-core and multi-core performance are the same.

The notebook is dry or not desktop, and the i9-11900K is stronger

The model of the same generation is naturally strong on the desktop end.

It is mainly constrained by notebook space, power consumption, heat dissipation, etc.

i9-9900K and Song pants round i7-12700KF comparison?

These two processors run from the wild collapse.

If you look at it, you can know that it is obviously the i7-12700KF is better, and the performance gap between the two is quite large.

i9-12900H and i5-13500 are two different generations of ** processors produced by Intel, and their differences are as follows:

Architecture: The i9-12900H uses Intel's Alder Lake architecture, while the i5-13500 uses the Rocket Lake architecture. Alder Lake is Intel's latest architecture and is more advanced than Rocket Lake.

Number of Cores: The i9-12900H has 8 Golden Cove Cores and 8 Gracemont Cores, for a total of 16 Cores. The i5-13500 only has 6 Cypress Cove cores, which is less than the i9-12900H.

Number of threads: The i9-12900H can handle 32 threads, while the i5-13500 can handle 12 threads.

Frequency: The i9-12900H has a base clock frequency of GHz and a maximum boost frequency of GHz. Whereas, the i5-13500 has a base clock rate of GHz and a maximum boost frequency of GHz.

Cache: The i9-12900H has 24 MB of cache, while the i5-13500 has only 16 MB of high-speed cache.

Overall, the i9-12900H is better than the i5-13500 in terms of architecture, number of cores, number of threads, frequency and cache. However, the i9-12900H is also more expensive than the i5-13500 and is suitable for users who need higher performance, while the i5-13500 is suitable for ordinary use scenarios.