Translation is urgently needed. Help! How to translate! Hurry, hurry

Cooperative competition"This concept refers to the cooperation between a business and its competitors in the course of its operation. However, some high-tech development companies believe in such a strategy, and only in the cruel market competition can they gain value. Most experts believe that those collaborations arise because of the merger and concentration of many high-tech industries, resulting in cutting-edge high-tech industries, just as some software development companies, such as Microsoft in the United States, also cooperate with other companies when developing the Internet.

Analysts** The trend of "working with your own competitors" will continue. The term "competitive partnership" has been used to refer to "executives have the final say," just as the term "broadband" is now commonly used to describe the ability of a person or team to handle the ever-increasing workload in the office. This concept, as some scholars put it on the webpage, "Some see business as competition, they think that doing business is a war of capital, and they assume that they will win if everyone else loses the war."

Others, on the other hand, see business as a collaborative team. However, in reality, business is both cooperative and competitive, which is the concept of cooperative competition. ”

Cooperation is the act of cooperation between a company and its competitors. However, the strategy of some high-tech enterprises is to take the lead in the cruel market competition. Many experts believe that this kind of mergers and acquisitions occurred due to the rapid merger between many high-tech enterprises, and with the arrival of new technologies, just as software companies like Microsoft expanded their business to the Internet, and competition and cooperation between companies coexisted with each other at the same time.

Analysts believe that this trend of working with the enemy will continue. Collaboration has been discarded, as broadband is now being described by more and more people as a situation in which a person or a business can freely handle a huge amount of work in a company.

This philosophy, as the writer points out on **: some people see business as a complete competition. They think that running a business is a war, and they think that as long as no one loses, then they can't win.

There are also those who see business management as a team partnership. However, enterprises are both cooperative and competitive. It is cooperative competition

All of these drafts have one thing in common: they all try to find the best singers, the most talented dancers, the funniest magicians, the funniest actors, and so on. All sorts of people participate in these auditions, but it's up to you who can play the piano the best or sing the best.

When people are on a talent show, they usually serve as one of them in the process of deciding who the winner is. And the winner is always well rewarded.

However, not everyone likes these drafts, some people think that the lives of the performers are all made up, for example, some people think that they are poor farmers, but in reality they are actors. But if you don't take these shows too seriously, they still look like fun, but the most important thing about talent shows is that it gives some people the avenue to achieve their dreams.

It's so hard to type, but the translation is quite simple)

The particular risks posed by SIFIS have suggested that there are two clear objectives to achieve the broad range of recommendations at the European and international levels in terms of how best to deal with regulation. On the one hand, the goal of regulation should be to both increase the SIFIS shock absorption capacity and reduce the contribution of systemic risk, with a special mention of the potential for sprawl and diffusion effects. On the other hand, the objective of regulation should be to reduce the burden on taxpayers, reduce moral hazard and the associated implicit or explicit bailout guarantees with a clear focus.

The difference between the two goals, however, is cloudy at best, since the relevance of SIFIS systemic risk and moral hazard, the problem is that "too big or interconnected failures" are related to mutually reinforcing and mutually reinforcing states, and it is difficult to distinguish one in relation to the impact of measures based on the above two objectives. Therefore, it can be argued that addressing one action goal is to achieve other goals as well as tools.