Solve the inequality 3X 2 2X 3

Updated on educate 2024-04-15
12 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    x<-3 2, -3x-2>-2x-3, get x<1, and hold at the same time, so x<-3 2.

    3 2<=x<=-2 3, -3x-2>2x+3, we get x<-1, so, -3 2<=x<-1.

    When x>=-2 3, 3x+2>2x+3, we get x>1, so x>1.

    Three-stage synthesis yields x<-1 or x>1.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Assuming that x is 0 and 2 is greater than 3 is not true.

    Assuming x is positive, then 3x+2 is greater than 2x+3 x is greater than 1

    Suppose x is negative, then 2-3x is greater than 3-2x, -5x is greater than 1, -x is greater than 1, x is less than -1, so x is greater than 1 and x is less than -1

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Both sides are squared at the same time, resulting in 9x 2 12x 4 4x 2+12x+9, i.e. x 2>1

    Solve x>1 or x<-1

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Write the standard point yourself)

    The squares of both sides give (3x+2) 2>(2x+3) 2 shifts and subtract them to get (x-1)(x+1)>0

    There are two scenarios.

    1. x-1> and x+1>0 get x>1

    2. x-1<0 and x+1<0 get x<-1

    Summary: The solution of inequality is.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Both sides are squared, got.

    9x 2+12x+4>4x 2+12x+9 i.e.

    5x^2>5

    x^2>1

    x>1 or x<-1

    It's done, and those who have money have a money field.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    2x 2+x+3<0 [Unsolved].

    When 2x 2+x+3=0

    b^2-4ac=1-24=-23<0

    2x^2+x+3>0

    When 2x 2+x+3=0

    b 2-4ac=1-24=-23 "Slow comma key 0 scramble finger pants x is an arbitrary real number].

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Because the image of the function f(x)=2x +x+3 is all above the x-axis, it is absolutely rotten.

    The solution set of 2x +x+3>0 is r, and the two omissions of the first cavity draft are empty sets.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    To facilitate your understanding.

    So the inequality is decomposed into two inequalities, which can be decomposed by the definition of absolute values.

    12.-(3-2x)>1

    Solving for the first inequality yields: x<1

    Solving for the second inequality yields: x>2

    Since the two solutions do not intersect.

    So the answer is "or".

    That is: x<1 or x>2

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Using the piecewise discussion method, let the equation in the two absolute values be equal to 0 respectively, and find the two values of x as the segmentation points, in this problem, x=2 and x=-5 are the segmentation points. Then it is divided into three segments according to the segmentation point, which is: 1)x<-5;2)-52;

    1) x<-5, the original inequality becomes 2-x-x-5>3, that is, x<-3, so the intersection is x<-5;

    2)-53, the constant holds, the intersection gets -52, the original inequality becomes x-2+x+5>3, that is, x>0, and the intersection gets x>2;

    In the above three cases, x is not equal to -5 or x is not equal to 2. In addition, if there are three absolute values, the same method can be used. Thank you!

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Number line,|x-2|+|x+5|>3,,|x-2|denotes the distance from the point to the point 2, |x+5|denotes the distance from point to point -5, inequality |x-2|+|x+5|The solution of >3 is the set of all points represented in the number axis if the sum of the distance from a point to 2 and the distance from a point to -5 is greater than 3.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Solution Inequality Group:

    3x-1>2x+1, then x>2

    2x>8 then x>4

    So: the set of solutions for the group of solution inequalities is:

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    3x-1>2x+1

    3x-2x>1+1

    x>22x>8

    x>4 can ask if you don't understand.

    Satisfied, thank you.

Related questions
15 answers2024-04-15

Solving inequalities|x+2|-|2x-1|≥1

Solution: x+2 -2 x-1 2 1 >>>More

15 answers2024-04-15

1. The solution set of inequality 3(x+2) 4+2x is ; Negative integers are solved as >>>More

10 answers2024-04-15

The answers are: a>1, in the range of (1 a,1);

When a=1, there is no range less than 0; >>>More

14 answers2024-04-15

This question should be simple with the separation parameter method. >>>More

11 answers2024-04-15

The original formula is equivalent to.

2(x-a/2)|+x+3|≥2x+4 >>>More