AMD Athlon II X4 630 Box Series Configuration Review

Well, the plan is good, and all the games in this configuration are spikes.

However, 90% of the Shadow GTX260+ may not be able to buy, if this is the case, you can consider 5770, or 4870 and 4890, first of all, these two cards are not easy to sell, **almost, around 1100-1400. There is another problem, the Shadow GTX260+ has a high screen rate, you can search on the Internet or go to the Zhongguancun forum to see.

There are changes in these, the motherboard does not have such a high price, 720 can get the goods, the hard disk is 320, they buy 285, and the market price of the memory has dropped again, at most give him 330.

This configuration is good, if it is not installed in a place you know, the clerk will definitely suggest that you change the configuration, there is no problem and will pick a problem for you, and then make your money by selling the accessories he suggests, don't be fooled, the old tricks of the JS, just stick to this configuration, and you will definitely not suffer.

The landlord didn't say the display, it is recommended to have at least a 22-inch monitor, Samsung is good, and the domestic AOC can also be.

260+ for 4890 is better.

It is better to add memory to 4G CPU and replace it with 710 or 720.

Online gaming graphics cards don't need to be that good. If you open more, you can add one to the memory.

Hello landlord!

The AMD Athlon II X4 641 and AMD Athlon II X4 740 are the two CPUs you asked about, compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 740, the performance of AMD Athlon II X4 740 is much stronger than that of AMD 641, and the price is almost 450 yuan, if it were me, I would not hesitate to choose AMD 740.

However, I still recommend that if you want to match a computer, choose a CPU at this price point, I think AMD 640 is also very good, because it is an AM3+ socket, while AMD 641 is FM1, AMD740 is FM2, these two socket types are not as extensive as AMD 640's AM3+ socket, and there are many options for upgrading in the future. Also, I don't need to say much about the cost performance of AMD 640 CPU, there are too many people who choose it! It is one of the best cost-effective in low-priced quad-core CPUs!

I hope it will be useful to the landlord, if it helps, please also accept it! Thank you!

It's not good, G860 65W is also the best, although it's only 2 cores, but it's X3 450 level, on single-core performance Intel 1 core = AMD core.

All the CPU of Intel is better for playing games, X4 740 is just a 2-touch 4-core bulldozer, power consumption 65W = X3 450, X4 641 is better than ( I want to 740, but 100W Hey,,, I can't buy X4.

Compared with AMD Athlon II X4 641 and AMD Athlon II X4 740, the AMD Athlon II X4 740 has higher frequency, lower power consumption, better performance, and better cost performance.

1. AMD Athlon-II X4 641 CPU frequency, four cores, 32nm manufacturing process, 100W thermal design power consumption (TDP), 128KB L1 cache, 4MB L2 cache.

2. AMD Athlon™ II X4 740CPU main frequency, the highest frequency of dynamic overclocking, frequency doubling 16 times, core code TRINITY, the number of cores is four cores, the production process is 32nm, the thermal design power consumption (TDP) is 65W, the L2 cache is 4MB, and the 64-bit processor.

x4 631 Well, I don't know very well either, but quad-core is better than triple-core, but the frequency is not as high as 445, I use 445

AMD Athlon II X4 631 is a bit stronger than AMD Athlon II X3 445, Athlon II X4 631 is a quad-core CPU, Athlon II X3 445 is a triple-core CPU, the following are the parameters of the two CPUs:

Athlon II X3 445 Parameters:

CPU Frequency:

Frequency octave: Double. Number of cores: Triple cores.

L2 Cache:.

Slot type: socket am3.

Thermal Design Power Consumption (TDP): 95W.

Athlon IIX4 631 Parameters:

CPU Frequency:

Frequency multiplication: 26x.

Number of cores: Quad cores.

L2 cache: 4MB.

Slot type: socket fm1.

Thermal Design Power Consumption (TDP): 100W.

Apparently 631 is better.

Athlon-631: Native physical quad-core, main frequency, 32nm process, 4MB L2 cache, FM1 interface.

Athlon-445: Physical triple core, main frequency, 45nm process, L2 cache, AM3 interface.

In terms of running scores: 445 scores are less than 7000, 631 scores are more than 8800 points, and the gap has been seen.

The former is better, quad-core. The speed is definitely faster than the triple-core.

The analysis is as follows:

1、It's not comparable,X4730It's a Pentium 2030 or so performance,I want to compare it with i3There is still a big gap。

2. Although there are many cores, after all, AMD early Athlon.

3、It's okay to compare it with the notebookU.,It should be equivalent to the book's i3.,Or the first generation i5The performance is equivalent.。

The X4 760K is also slightly worse than the i3 4130, but it is better value for money. Down there are x4 750k, x4 740, x4 730, and the frequency is lower than the other, so the performance is worse than the other. The difference between the two similar models is very small, for example, X4 760K is just a little stronger than 750K, which is negligible, but X4 760K is still a lot stronger than X4 730, let alone compared with i3.