The dialectical relationship between sweeping a house and sweeping the world

First, from the perspective of linguistics, the interpretation of a room in the Commercial Press is that it refers to small things in general, and mostly refers to small things that do not pay attention to life, not details or basic things. If you don't sweep a room, it's not that you can't sweep, but you don't need to sweep it. You can sweep the world without sweeping a room.

Second, from the perspective of axiology, the world is macroscopic, and it is a co-prosperity idea centered on the interests of more people. People are members of society, and everyone should set lofty ideals and ambitions. When we are struggling to sweep the world, how can the small things of life stop us from moving forward.

Third, from the perspective of dialectics, the one room and the world are two different wholes, and they are not simply genus and species. Therefore, the two cannot be reduced to the relationship between the whole and the parts. The two exist independently of each other, and sweeping a room has no direct impact on sweeping the world.

In terms of primary and secondary contradictions, the whole world is the main contradiction, while the first room is the secondary contradiction, and we should concentrate our efforts on resolving the main contradiction. Therefore, sweeping the world is our most important task.

Fourth, from a sociological point of view, the division of labor in modern society has reached an unprecedented height. Individuals have limited energy, and many things can be left to specialized practitioners to do. This is in line with the spirit of division of labor and cooperation in modern society.

As the saying goes, "good steel is used on the blade", of course we should concentrate on sweeping the world.

If you want to go to the big goal, you have to start with a small goal, how can a person who can't even do small things do a big thing? 1+1 doesn't know how much it is equal to threaten to do 1+2, isn't it nonsense?

Writing ideas: first give your own point of view, "you can sweep the world without sweeping a house", and then give a corresponding conclusion according to your own point of view to prove the correctness of your point of view, the center should be prominent and clear, etc.

Text: Our point of view is: "If you don't sweep a house, you can sweep the world." "At the beginning, the concept comes first.

One room at the Commercial Press.

In the interpretation, it refers to "small things, trivial things of life", which is a secondary contradiction, and does not refer to basic things. Sweeping the world is the success of gaining public recognition in the career, which is the main contradiction. Of course, we do not exclude sweeping a house, what we emphasize is that sweeping a house is not an inevitable process of sweeping the world.

Below, I would like to elaborate on my views from the following three aspects.

First, people's energy is limited, since they have chosen to sweep the world, why bother to sweep a house? It is impossible for people to be exhaustive, not to mention whether it is possible for one person to grasp all the details, if a person considers all the details, dare to ask how to achieve great things? If a person always cares about the details, dare to ask, how can he focus on the ideal of sweeping the world?

If a person does not know how to delegate the tasks in his hands to others, dare to ask him how to become a leader?

Therefore, the ultimate goal of a successful person is to sweep the world, and sweeping the world is the main contradiction. Dayu controls the water three times and does not enter the house.

Because he knows that saving the common people is the mission, the luck of the family is not as good as the blessing of the people, in the face of the overall situation of the world, there should be different feelings, just ask: should the king of a country keep the family in order, or should he pacify the Quartet, crisscrossing the eight wildernesses? Therefore, those who have the world in mind will never be trapped by a piece of land, and if they are eagles, they should fly high.

Second, there is a certain connection between sweeping a house and sweeping the world. But there is no necessary connection between the two. Admittedly, there is nothing wrong with paying attention to the minutiae in itself, but for the sake of the goal of sweeping the world, overemphasizing that sweeping a house is a necessary condition for sweeping the world.

It seems very far-fetched, is it - can one person sweep a thousand houses to sweep the world?

In other words, you can sweep the world if you sweep a house, and you can sweep the world if you don't sweep a house, so why spend time and energy to sweep a house? Is this too much? To use an analogy, a housewife.

You can handle the details very well, and you can manage the trivial matters perfectly, but let a housewife sweep the world, I'm afraid I have more than enough heart and not enough power, right?

Therefore, whether you can manage the world has almost nothing to do with whether you pay attention to the details, in general, it is important to pay attention to the details, but it is not necessary, especially from the overall situation of sweeping the world, sweeping a house as a secondary contradiction, the impact on sweeping the world is minimal.

Laughing to death, what people want is the opposite.