-
I think the service industry is the most angry, because a little poor service was complained, once worked in the express company, many people left, the reason can not wait for the current people, play ** or did not make the customer satisfied with the matter of the minute was complained, and then the company fined, and then let the staff apologize to the customer, so many people are unwilling to do express delivery! (Of course, it is said that the customers who ignore it, most of them are also stabbing customers, relying on the right to consume and insist on saying that they are wrong), you and unreasonable customers are always they reasonable, and they are justified!
-
The service industry is the most angry, because a little poor service was complained, once worked in the express company, many people left, the reason can not wait for people now, such as a courier to send a single 1-2 yuan, play ** or did not deliver to the door did not make the customer satisfied minutes of the matter was complained, and then the company fined, and then let the staff apologize to the customer, so many people do not want to do express delivery!
-
I think the executive in the company is the most annoyed. Security guards, cleaners, attendance checks, these are all company administrative staff. Administrative work is to serve the company's internal work, and the service is always very angry, do administrative work is often coordinated in various departments and before the boss, a bad even the administrative director will not be caught between the boss and other department heads as a gas bag.
Therefore, the nature of the work of administrative work determines that the people in this department are the most popular in the whole company.
-
I'm a test worker, always caught between clinicians and patients, and sometimes thankless. Well done, management and even clinicians will only say that it is for the patient to find out** or to generate revenue for the hospital. If you do a bad job, you will only say that the work of the laboratory department is not technical, and the report form is often messed up, etc.
Therefore, it is simply a rat in the bellows, and it is angry on both sides.
-
The hotel that I read about hotel management, our industry is an angry industry, and we have to endure it. One time a customer ordered a pot of tea without looking at the menu, and it was too expensive afterwards, and then he was smiling for a long time, and I looked at him with a smile, even though he didn't like what he said. He said that when he was tired, he would not pay crookedly.
-
The most prominent is the enterprise to fulfill the responsibility of serving the community to provide free service-oriented positions, internally for the purpose of profit, you will have a variety of unclear assessment indicators, external you are serving people but no service fee turkey type character, that is, no sense of identity and lack of value, in the end will only make the feeling of more and more defeat depressed breathless.
-
It's hard to say. There are always some people who are angry. The qi of the same level, the qi of the superior, the qi of the subordinate.
In fact, colleagues are a small and balanced social group. Between the qi and the qi, the cycle is endless. How to treat it with a balanced mentality, and, in summary, predict and avoid it at critical moments, is a very deep interpersonal relationship.
This is the fundamental difference between some people who can eat well and get promoted and raised, while some people are depressed and unhappy.
-
The workplace is like this, unless you are the boss and have the final say, or you are at the bottom, only affected by the anger from above, and want to climb up, these are all necessary, adjust the state more, change your style of acting, and deal with the relationship between the leader and the subordinates.
-
In today's society, work is an important part of people's lives, and it is also an important way for people to realize their self-worth and social value. Work can not only bring economic income, but also bring satisfaction in terms of professional achievement, social recognition, and personal growth. However, work is not all smooth sailing, and many times, people encounter various difficulties and challenges, such as work pressure, fierce competition, complex interpersonal relationships, bosses do not understand, and so on.
These questions can make people feel frustrated, annoyed, aggrieved, and even hurt and insulted. At this point, people are faced with a choice: are you willing to be angry for a good wage?
This may seem like a simple question, but it's actually complicated. Different people may have different answers, and they may also change over time and circumstances. Some people may choose to swallow their anger and sacrifice their dignity and happiness for a good wage; Some may choose to stick to their principles and give up a good salary for the sake of their dignity and happiness; Others may choose to strike a balance and strive to change the status quo in order to have both a good salary and their own dignity and happiness.
So, which choice is the right one? In my opinion, there is no absolute standard for judging which choice is the right one, because everyone has their own values, goals, needs, and circumstances. For some people, a good salary may be a necessity in their life or a goal to pursue, and they may feel that it is worth enduring some grievances for the sake of this goal; For others, their own dignity and happiness may be the basis of their lives or the meaning they are pursuing, and they may feel the need to give up some interests for the sake of that meaning; For some people, they may feel that a good salary and their dignity and happiness are not mutually exclusive or conflicting, and they may feel that they can improve their working environment and conditions through hard work or communication, so as to achieve a win-win situation or a win-win situation.
Therefore, I believe that when it comes to this issue, we should make appropriate choices based on our values, goals, needs, and circumstances, and bear the corresponding consequences and responsibilities. We should respect our own and others' choices, not impose our own views and standards on others, and do not blindly follow others' views and standards. We should understand that no job is perfect, and no job is irreplaceable.
We should choose a job that suits us according to our abilities and interests, and we should also adjust our attitudes and behaviors according to our emotions and intellect. We should strive to improve our professional level and overall quality, and we should also strive to safeguard our personal dignity and quality of life. We should cherish our job opportunities and income**, as well as our physical and mental health and well-being.
In short, are you willing to be angry for a good salary? This is a question that has no standard answer, and it is also a question that requires constant reflection and introspection. I hope that everyone can find their own answers, and I hope that everyone can find their own happiness.
-
This question involves work-life trade-offs, and here's how I see it:
1.If you focus only on wages, the cost may be high in the long run. Putting up with the unhappiness of the wheeled atmosphere or content of work simply for the sake of a higher wage can lead to reduced work stress and quality of life, as well as physical and mental health, and these costs may collectively outweigh the benefits of wages.
2.However, for those with a stressful life, the importance of salary should not be underestimated. If the family is struggling to make ends meet, a higher wage is significant for reducing the burden of living, and it may be necessary to choose to obtain a higher income in the short term.
But in the long run, it is still necessary to seek a work environment with a relatively balanced quality and income.
3.Personal character and attitude are also key. Some people are more tolerant in personality and less sensitive to being angry or not, and can adapt to a certain amount of work pressure through personal adjustment.
Some people lack the ability to cope with the pressure of the work environment, are very sensitive to anger, and the attractiveness of the salary cannot offset the unhappiness brought by the environment. This requires self-knowledge.
4.It also depends on the nature and prospects of the work. If it is a job with good prospects for you and the opportunity to learn and grow, then a certain amount of anger is also acceptable, and a high income is only one of the factors.
If you accept jobs with poor job prospects and developmental prospects simply for high wages, the consequences will be more serious in the long run.
To sum up, my view is that choosing to work for a good salary is not a long-term solution. It is necessary to comprehensively consider the quality of the working environment, personal affordability, family livelihood pressure, and job prospects, and weigh the salary and cost.
If salary is the only reason to stay in the job and all else is not ideal, it is not a good option in the long run.
The ideal state is to find a job with a relative balance between the salary and the quality of the work environment. But in the process of finding balance, personal life needs also need to be considered, and choosing to be angry in the short term is not entirely bad, but it is important to set a schedule and find a better place to shoot. It's often not a wise choice to let your salary be the only reason to be offended.
It is necessary to consider the balance between wages and quality of life in the general environment. Personal preferences and personality also need to play a role in these decisions.
Definitely very promising, the IT industry is the fairest, no one relies on relationships, relies on background, competence decides everything, and is engaged in IT >>>More
Service, my understanding is the process of heart-to-heart, when the user complains, do we really calm down to consider, do we really stand at the user level, timely and appropriate handling of what happened?
I think the idea I want to express the most is that the gap between the rich and the poor is very real, but if the poor want to become rich, they must do it through their own efforts, not through the way.
A pulmonary nodule is a round or irregular mass in the lungs that is less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter. There are single or multiple nodules, solid nodules, partially solid nodules, and ground-glass density nodules. There are clear or blurred lines. >>>More
For college entrance examination candidates, when the college entrance examination is over, they should start to pay attention to their favorite majors. There is a certain difference between the majors that boys and girls prefer. For example, male students generally prefer engineering majors, while female students prefer language majors. >>>More