The new regulations deal with old houses, are some people s charter dreams about being shattered?

Of course not. The new regulations deal with old houses, not confiscate relevant properties, which is good news for owners, the new regulations stipulate that the previous shantytown reform policy is changed to a house-for-house policy and the implementation plan of "old reform", for owners, there is no loss, in other words, for owners may the value of the property is still improved.

1. The new provisions only make changes to the previous provisions

The new regulations only indicate that the mode of rectification has been modified, and the previous measures for shantytown reform have been changed, and the previous measures for giving property owners demolition funds have been changed to the form of house-for-house, as well as the form of old reform. The so-called house-for-house is to exchange the existing old house for the current property of the same value, or the house that is higher than the existing property; Renovation is the renovation of existing old houses, such as water, electricity, gas, parking spaces, etc.

Second, the value of the property remains unchanged or has increased

The new regulations point out that the previous measures of subsidy for demolition and relocation will be cancelled and replaced with a house-for-house or a form of renovation. This is not a bad thing for the owner of the property, because the geographical location and output value of the house in exchange may be higher than the previous old house, even if the value is the same, it will not harm his personal interests, so there is no such thing as the shattering of the dream of chartering the public.

3. The new regulations protect the relevant rights and interests of property owners

Whether it's for people with multiple properties or for those who only have one old house, the new rules are beneficial and harmless. Regardless of how the rectification is carried out, the rights and interests of the property owner are still protected accordingly. For those who only have one old house, there is no need to consider the problem of no house to live in the future, and for people with multiple properties, there is no need to worry about whether the property will change or depreciate.

In short, whether it is the change of the living environment, or the change of the location of the old house, or the increase in the appreciation space of the community, it is not harmless to the owners of the previous house, and it is worth congratulating, and there is no broken dream of chartering.

Compared with the early years, many people got rich through demolition, it is a broken dream, in the early years, the direct demolition policy of the old house made many ordinary people quickly become the second generation of demolition, and they can get a huge amount of money overnight with the old house, and now the policy is different, and it can only be said that although the strength is different, but the owners of the old house are also benefited, better than nothing.

How can the dream be shattered, even if they can't earn money by collecting rent, they can still get a large amount of compensation through the old house, and they will not suffer a loss.

It is true that in the past, if the old house could be demolished, it would get a large amount of compensation, but now if the state takes care of the house, it will not get a lot of compensation and the whole house.

Some people's dream of chartering is indeed about to be shattered, because this new regulation actually makes many people unable to be chartered public.

The state has issued new regulations to deal with old houses, and the old houses will be demolished, and many people's dreams of relying on rent collection to maintain their lives are indeed going to be shattered.