What is the difference between AMD and Intel

Two different brands.

Divide from **.

The Internet Pentium is the most expensive, the second belongs to AMD, and the third is Celeron.

If the Pentium wants 1000, AMD is almost 800, and the Celeron only needs about 500-600 from the point of view of functionality.

Internet is mainly good comprehensive performance, suitable for design and the like, and has relatively high requirements for computing power, while AMD mainly focuses on entertainment, such as playing games, Celeron is mainly home CPU, listening to songs, surfing the Internet, playing some ordinary games, dealing with some office software, etc.

Motherboards are also divided into AMD and Internet, if it is an AMDCPU, it must be equipped with K7, K8 motherboards, if it is Internet, Celeron CPU, it is equipped with motherboards like 810, 815, 845, 865 and the like.

AMD is fast, Internet is stable.

AMD does one more discrete graphics card than Intel, but does a lot less than Intel! There are so many differences, and I know that the same thing is that they are both businessmen who seek to maximize profits!

In terms of CPU, AMD's performance is similar to Intel's, that is, it is better than AMD in terms of quality, and the price is more expensive than AMD's, but Intel's is definitely better than AMD's Other aspects, hehe, not much to say.

The name is different. Prices vary.

If you want a stable system, use Intel

Play games with AMD

There is not much difference between the Ryzen R5 and the Core i5, but Ryzen is more cost-effective.

Intel's latest i5 processor is the i5-1135G7, and the Ryzen processor chooses the finger-resistant R5-4600U for comparison. The gap between the two is not big, but in terms of **, i5 is much more expensive than the Ryzen version, so for office, audio-visual entertainment, give priority to Ryzen processor notebooks, and the price is definitely higher.

In the same power consumption, in terms of single-core range, the CinebenchR20 score of the i5-1135G7 is higher than that of the R5-4600U, and the single-core performance is stronger. With 25W power consumption, the I5-1135G7 score is 68 points more than the R5-4600U, and the gap is not very big.

In the case of multi-threading, the Ryzen R5 processor has more multi-core performance. If the laptop has more multi-core tasks in the use case, then choosing a Ryzen processor will perform better, than teasing such as frequent editing, special effects rendering, etc.

Advantages of thin and light laptops:

AMD's process technology is a little higher, and it can release more performance with lower power consumption, but the peak performance, or Intel cattle, if you play games, some games are not optimized very well, i5 is a little ahead, but ** a comparison, maybe R5 is still cheaper.

If you play games, some games are not optimized very well, i5 is a little ahead, but** a comparison, maybe R5 is still cheaper, if it is a nuclear display to play games, then the 12th generation i5, now not as good as the 6000 series nuclear display, but stronger than the 5000 series Ryzen 10 more.

AMD is just a foil to Intel.

Intel basically has a monopoly on CPUs and chipsets in the computer market, and AMD exists only to prevent Intel from being split or penalized for monopoly.

In the semiconductor manufacturing industry, Intel process has always been at the forefront; AMD used to have its own factory, but it was spun off due to business losses**.

In the CPU chip design industry, Intel is basically a leader, out of the K7, K8 and 64 processors, once inferior to AMD. At present, in terms of graphics processor design, AMD has temporarily maintained its performance leadership with the acquisition of ATI as a graphics processor and chipset, but its market share is far less than that of Intel's integrated graphics chips.

Therefore, relatively speaking, with the help of design capabilities and advanced semiconductor manufacturing processes, Intel's processors are more reliable in terms of performance and quality, but because they are in a monopoly position, although they occupy a large market and reduce the cost of chips, they are still sold at a higher price (the so-called cost performance is worse than AMD). Comparatively speaking, AMD chips are inferior to Intel's chips in terms of service life, which is a comparison of my more than ten years in this industry.

AMD dual-core two cores work together to handle the same task, which is just different from Intel's dual-core concept, Intel only runs one core under a single task, and two cores do their own work under multitasking, which is why AMD's dual-core is more efficient than Intel...

AMD's CPUs work differently, so they can't all look at the frequency in order to compare with Intel.

In terms of floating-point computing power, Intel's processors generally only have two floating-point execution units, while AMD's processors are generally designed with three parallel floating-point execution units, so among processors of the same grade, the floating-point computing power of AMD processors is better than Intel's processors.

It has strong floating-point arithmetic capabilities, which is advantageous for game applications and 3D processing applications. In addition, in terms of multi-** instructions, Intel has developed the SSE instruction set, which has now developed to SSE3, and AMD has also developed a corresponding, enhanced 3D NOW! Instruction set.

In contrast, Intel's processor is slightly better than AMD's in terms of multi-instruction, and there are many software optimized for SSE, so in multi-** software and plane processing software, compared with AMD processors of the same grade, Intel's CPU appears to have more advantages. In addition, what kind of CPU to choose,** is a more critical factor, in terms of performance, the same grade of Intel processor as a whole may have a little advantage over AMD's processor, but in terms of **, AMD's processor is absolutely superior.

For example: Intel's P4** is about 1200, and AMD's Barton 2500+, which has similar performance, is only priced at about 600.

Intel and AMD processors are now the two most mainstream and the most powerful on the market. If you have to divide the highs and lows, Intel is naturally slightly better. From the consumer's point of view, the difference between the two is mainly in the following two points:

1. The focus is in different directions. Intel's CPU is fast and very stable. Especially for the computing power of graphics.

That's why designers basically choose computers with Intel processors. AMD's new products have more advantages in multi-core and multi-threading, so some of the new products will be very fast for gaming. Many gamers prefer AMD because it is cheaper and can get fast speeds.

2. The cost performance is different. for processors with the same configuration. AMD's price point will be lower than Intel's, but it's a little worse in terms of stability.

So in the middle and low end, the former can meet the needs of most people. Of course, AMD also has relatively high-end products, such as the current new Ryzen, but in the high-end field, for example, the need for rendering and other higher load capacity, or Intel's cost performance is higher and better to use.

There are also heavy triple-A masterpiece games.

Your needs are directly associated with the Savior Y9000P.

Ask the new Moba.

It seems that it can be 3060 full power consumption.

You need more than 10,000 notebooks.

Question: By the way, is ROG full power.

This is a problem that people like me who are also considering the difficulty of choosing, and I think it should be considered comprehensively, of course, I recommend AMD for better compatibility and more cost-effective.

Intel is the world's largest computer hardware company, and its consistency is the first position in the industry, high-end CPUs are more frequent, have more threads, and are definitely better if they are playing games, and the power output is more stable.

If you have a sufficient budget or choose Intel, which is more stable, efficient and low-power, and more mainstream. This should be based on your own situation, choose your own more suitable computer.

AMD and Intel are both computer processors (CPUs), and the difference between them is probably different manufacturers.

As for which one is better, let's compare it in detail from the following aspects. First of all, in terms of production process, Intel is more advanced, and Intel's advantages are more obvious, both the advancement of technology and the stability are more prominent. Secondly, in terms of cost performance, AMD wins, and it is not difficult to find that Intel's price will always be a little higher than AMD, and the price can be said to be an advantage for a brand to seize the market.

Finally, to sum up, if the price budget is sufficient, Intel is still recommended. Judging from the current process, AMD is really not as good as Intel in terms of heat control, especially in the summer. If you pay more attention to cost performance, ADM is recommended when the price of low-end products is almost the same.

In addition, if you like to play games, Intel's chip is more recommended because it has better performance.

Now it's better to be amd.

It turns out that for a long time, Intel has been in an absolute leading position, crushing AMD in terms of performance, and there are even many people who say i3 seconds for the whole family, which means that the CPU of the Core i3 can knock out all the CPUs of AMD in seconds. AMD has always had obvious disadvantages in terms of performance and power consumption, the bulldozer architecture that has always been used, can increase the frequency to a very high level, but the power consumption is also ridiculously high, and in terms of performance, the performance of the AMD bulldozer architecture is average, and the power consumption is much higher.

It wasn't until 2017 that AMD developed the Ryzen processor that turned this situation around. AMD's Ryzen architecture has been greatly improved in terms of performance and energy efficiency, which can basically catch up with Intel's processor performance in the same year, and is slightly worse in single-core performance, and AMD far surpasses Intel in multi-core performance. AMD has achieved performance beyond Intel with more cores.

This is the first generation of Ryzen products, which basically reaches Intel's performance in terms of core architecture, but in terms of the number of cores and the number of threads, it crushes Intel's processors in the same year, and far exceeds Intel processors in terms of multi-core performance. This is AMD's counterattack.

When the performance is about the same, AMD's ** has a very obvious advantage, **at least the first half, and the performance is not reduced at all, and the cost performance is far higher than Intel.

Because the performance of AMD processors has been greatly improved, Intel is also forced to no longer use the strategy of squeezing toothpaste, because the architecture can not be significantly improved for a while, so Intel began to increase the number of cores and threads of its own processors to compete with AMD, but it is still not as large as the number of cores and threads of AMD, this generation of duel, Intel still has no advantage. AMD continues to lead the way.

And AMD's integrated graphics performance is better, several times stronger than Intel's integrated graphics, basically catching up with the mid-range discrete graphics card. AMD also has obvious advantages in image performance, which can save the price of a graphics card, and the performance is not inferior to that of a discrete graphics card, and the cost performance is very high, and it is stronger than Intel in CPU and GPU.

In the third-generation AMD and Intel showdown, AMD continued to expand its advantages, taking the lead in using TSMC's latest process, in terms of power consumption and performance, compared with Intel has obvious advantages, while Intel continues to use the ancient process, in the number of cores and threads still can't stack AMD, and now it's AMD's turn to crush Intel.

The two brands are still better than Intel's.

First of all, the positioning of the two brands is different, the former is not focused on the high-end field, and has not launched products that can compete with the latter. And AMD really wants to open up sales through cost performance. After all, the latter has always been the king of the market, accounting for almost half of the market share.

And Intel does not pursue cost-effectiveness in low-end products.

AMD's processors are actually not bad for playing games, but they are more dependent on memory. In terms of power consumption, the size is larger, and the power consumption is also very high. But its opponents are different, with years of stable technological development will keep its CPU at a low energy consumption level, and the stability is also very high, but AMD is more dependent on the size of the memory, if the memory is too small, the brand's processor may not be able to run.

And AMD and Intel are also different in that due to the relatively small audience in the market, some of the software used with it will not be optimized for the brand's CPU.

Intel is better, the best computer processor at the moment is Intel, AMD and Intel are currently in the competition stage.

First of all, we have to make it clear that the current development trend of AMD is getting better and better, and the gap between AMD's development and Intel is getting smaller and smaller, which is enough to prove that AMD's performance is getting better and better. Besides, AMD now uses an advanced 12nm manufacturing process, which is much better than the original AMD when it first started, but the production process between AMD and Tel, whether in terms of heat generation or CPU power consumption, there are obvious differences. Besides.

In people's concepts, they are more familiar with Intel, and AMD has always been unable to compare with Intel, so many people complain that the production technology of AMD processors is bad, but those processors who have really used AMD, including the combination of motherboards, know how cost-effective AMD is.

There will also be people who say that AMD's overclocking performance will be unstable, and there will be a blue screen of death, but we must know that in fact, when we use AMD's CPU, overclocking needs not only to test the performance of the computer CPU, but also for the motherboard CPU power supply capacitor, motherboard chips, and power supply requirements, there are obvious requirements, so we can't attribute all the reasons to the CPU after the computer is unstable. Then I felt that the quality of AMD's processors was not very good. In fact, from the AMD 2500 released in 2005 to the current R72700X, I believe that people who have used AMD processors have a clear feeling that AMD CPUs are indeed developing with their hearts now.

And whether it is the architecture of the CPU, AMD R72700X, the comprehensive performance exceeds i7 8700, more than about 15%, for the development of CPU, as well as the performance of CPU, this has been significantly improved, and multi-core and multi-threading, the production process has been improved, that is, it represents the improvement of the default main frequency, and it will not be like Intel, a processor, distinguishing the so-called i3, i5, i7, and is also divided into the first and second generations to the current eighth generation processor, Compared with each model and each generation, many people say that he is squeezing toothpaste, and there is no qualitative improvement in performance, but there is a difference of hundreds.

However, when the AMD Ryzen processor was first launched, because of the poor memory compatibility of the Ryzen processor, it led to a series of stability problems, but with the subsequent update and repair of the BIOS, this problem is almost gone, and the latest Ryzen 2 generation product line has no problem from the beginning, if you have to say that it can't catch up with Intel in terms of CPU quality, that is, the processor's overclocking ability and single-core performance, it is still slightly inferior to Intel, In other aspects, whether it is gamers or working rendering, today's AMD processors are stable and fast to complete.

So Intel is better than AMD.