How garbage AMD is AMD Why is there a lot of price difference between AMD and Intel CPUs

AMD garbage?

If you can't do it yourself, don't scream.

The AMD used by me and my classmates next to me didn't have any of the problems you mentioned.

No one or even a country has the right to say AMD garbage.

I can't even make a more garbage disposer myself.

What qualifications do you have to shout here?

AMD's cost performance is higher than Intel's, AMD is more suitable for game platforms, AMD performance will be better when I first bought it, but its performance will slowly decline after using it for a period of time, and Intel's performance is relatively stable, and Intel's technical content is higher than AMD's on the same grade of products!

AMD is pretty good, don't kill 1 boat man with 1 rod.

The A64 3000+ of the year was a classic, better than the P4 6 series, and the 3600+ X2 was much better than the PD (Crippled Dual-Core), but it was not comparable to the Core in the high-end.

, I use AMD and I don't have any problems, but Intel's D series is rubbish to death in comparison.

If you don't understand, don't talk nonsense, without AMD, there would be no dual-core, there would be no CPU with such a small heat generation now, and without AMD, the cheapest CPU may be several thousand.

Please, take a look at it online.

LZ hit the tofu to death.

No.

AMD uses a silicon interposer, which is stacked against the core, and Intel uses EMIB, which consists of multiple smaller chips sealed in a rectangular package. In terms of iteration, generally speaking, the newer generation of chips has better performance, such as AMD Ryzen 4000 series is better than Ryzen 3000 series, and the new generation is stronger than the old one.

Precautions for using AMD CPUs.

AMD processors still use a pin-type design, and the mainstream on the market is AM3 AM3+ interface and FM1 interface. Intel processors use a contact-based design, and the mainstream on the market is LGA 1155 LGA 2011 interface. Although the fool-proof interface is a very simple design, it has effectively saved the lives of countless CPUs.

Recently, Intel's mainstream processor is the SNB architecture Core i3 i5 i7 processor, using the LGA 1155 interface. The Core i7 series processors with high-end SNB-E architecture are positioned and use the LGA 2011 interface.

It can't be said that AMB's CPU is really attenuating quickly, you can only say that it may be a little faster than Intel's attenuation, but this also refers to the previous Intel's CPU, and the current Intel's CPU attenuation speed is not slow.

There's nothing you can't buy, AMD's graphics cards are still okay. It's the problem of dropping the driver before, plus many games are not very well optimized for AMD, which makes everyone feel that AMD's GPU is not good. In 2022, AMD's optimization of drivers and games is very good, and there are few drivers dropped, so AMD's graphics cards can be bought, and even cost-effective.

The main thing is that there are many differences in performance, which leads to the difference in performance, why is there a difference in performance?

My understanding is that this is mainly because AMD's capital is not enough, and its market value is less than 5 billion.

And Intel has more than 100 billion...

If the funds are insufficient, the investment in R&D will be insufficient, and now there is no wafer factory of its own, and it is even more troublesome to develop it. ··

If there is no money, there is no one, and if there is no money, there are not too many excellent engineers, and there is not enough talent... There were also issues with AMD's management team.

The two companies had different ideas in the early days.

Amd's founder, Bernie Sanders, was a marketing executive at Fairchild.

Moore, the founder of Intel, was an engineer at Fairchild.

AMD was an OEM for Intel in the early days, and the technical reserves of the two companies are much different, and the standard of microprocessors is still in the hands of Intel...

AMD is completely behind Intel in the experience of manufacturing microprocessors, so it often tries to break through in technology, but in the end it was all learned by Intel...

Intel is more technologically advanced! In high-end products, the most obvious!

However, the performance of AMD is better than that of Intel for low-end products, the same **! For the same performance, AMD is a little cheaper.

Because AMD performance is not good.

AMD has to use four cores to spell dual cores, six cores and eight cores to spell Intel quad cores, Intel's six cores, AMD is embarrassed.

Categories: Computer, Networking, >> Hardware.

Problem description: I've heard that playing games is fun, isn't it?

Analysis: What we came into contact with started from K5, which is the same generation as Intel's P1, and is the 5th generation processor developed by AMD, so it is K5K4, K3, K2, corresponding to AMD's 486, 386, 286 chips, K1 is the 80086 processor, the earliest AMD chip before 286.

But we started with AMD's K5 on our PC, so we count the K5 as AMD's first generation.

K5, corresponding to Intel Pentium and Pentium MMX

K6, corresponding to Intel P2 processor.

K6, corresponding to Intel P3 level processor, poison dragon, athlon, two.

K7, one of the most classic generation AMD processors, has three types: Athlonx XP, Seprom, and Poison Dragon, which supports DDR333 the highest.

Finally, K8, corresponding to P4, P4E, PD processor, the performance is very strong and tight, the early K8 is the early 754 pins, only Athlon64, and then there is a flash dragon, which supports DDR400 single-channel memory, and the front-side bus is 800MHzThe second generation K8 is 939 pins, supports DDR400 dual channel, out of the flash dragon, athlon and athlonX2 three kinds, K8 3rd generation is AM2 940 pin support up to DDR800 single channel or DDR667 dual channel. In terms of performance, there is actually no difference between it and the 939.

But the price is cheaper.

K8 also had a special 940 pin for Haolong, and later merged with AM2.

Take a closer look: Intel processors are better than AMD processors for heavy office gaming. In most cases, AMD is strong in multi-threaded performance, but Intel is stronger in single-core performance, so the frame rate on the game will have a certain advantage, and the optimization is better.

Rush Bu no. Intel: Level 31 (can be increased to a higher frequency, but brings greater heat: for example, P4-670 is over-reached, but liquid nitrogen must be used to dissipate heat, and it is easy to cause inefficient instruction execution, so the disadvantage is to make up for it by making a hyper-thread).

AMD: Level 20 (the efficiency of instruction execution is stronger than level 31, but the frequency increase is limited and the heat generation is relatively low, efficiency and frequency are two different development directions, mainly depending on the user's choice).

Intel and AMD processor comparison summary:

1. Compatibility with trembling posture.

Intel compatibility and stability are better, AMD stability and compatibility are still not as good as Intel, the current third-generation Ryzen processors will still have memory compatibility problems, and some brands of memory may cause the memory frequency to go up, or the problem of not lighting up directly.

2. Warranty time.

Both Intel Boxed and AMD Boxed are backed by a three-year warranty.

Because the energy efficiency of ADM in the previous processor was very poor, and Ryzen has never had Intel's energy efficiency number before, resulting in many people have a deep impression of ADM, the current market Intel has a very high market, and Intel accounts for a very high proportion of the CPU market on the x86 platform.

However, the rise of ADM has successfully won a place in the market, and it has rapidly developed into the second largest company in the United States, especially before it was built with a new 14nm process, the new process brings lower power consumption and heat, and supports DDR4 specification memory for the first time.

In addition, the 8-core and 16-thread design brings powerful multi-threaded computing capabilities, which is about double the performance of AMD's previous 8-core and 8-thread products. From this point on, ADM has been on the way.

Purchase suggestion] 1, there are high requirements for surface temperature control.

2. Players who like RGB backlit keyboards.

3. The requirements for noise control are not high.

The biggest feature of Acer Shadow Knight Dragon is the keyboard temperature control, the keyboard is lower than 40 under high load, which is relatively rare in gaming laptops, and its ** is not expensive.

In terms of screen, the measured color gamut volume is, color gamut coverage, average δe, maximum δe, although there is no high resolution, but it is enough to play games.