Why do most people think that Go is superior to Chinese chess?

I feelMaybe it's because Go is too mysterious. If everyone around them is learning Go, and everyone is talking about Go, maybe chess will be more prominent in their eyes.

And I personally think that the more wonderful point may be the color scheme of Go. Go has only two colors, one black and one white, as if it were a taijituYin and yang, the road to simplicity. And unlike chess, the shape of Go is also very simple, a small circle.

All these simplified elements give Go a layer of mystery.

Then it comes to the moves of the chess pieces. According to people who have played Go and Xiangqi at the same time, they believe that the way of moving Go is more diverse, on a small chessboard, fighting for the world, you come and go, there are struggles and temporary compromises. Chess, on the other hand, is more disciplined, after all, specific chess pieces have a prescribed way of moving, and their thinking is not so active.

Some people describe Go as "a game of political thinking, and chess as a struggle of military thinking." The rules of chess itself determine the characteristics, in fact, there is no superiority. Go is strategically complex, while chess is better in terms of variety of classes.

The more you kill the territory of Go, the smaller it gets, and the bigger the territory you kill the more you kill it", the two cannot be compared.

It can only be said that the appearance and propaganda methods in life give people the impression that "Go is more lofty". For example, in various Go competitions on TV, both sides are dignified and elegant. And chess is too ubiquitous, and there are uncles downstairs shouting and playing chess in groups of three or five, rolling up their sleeves, wearing big pants, and chatting fiercely on the chessboard.

Chess is so "down-to-earth" that it is as normal in people's hearts as eating and drinking water every day.

It can be seen that the popularity of Go is still not as good as that of XiangqiTherefore, Go will be more mysterious in the public's impression, which is one of the best ideas of "tall". In addition, the entry threshold for Go is also relatively high, and the cost of money and time is slightly more. However, with the popularization of Go, it may gradually change people's impression of it.

First of all, I would like to state that there is no statement that Go is higher than chess, but the complexity of Go is higher than that of chess, and this complexity is justified, as a Go enthusiast, I have been galloping across the nineteen battlefields for many years, and chess pays attention to taking precautions, long-term vision, and profit and loss in mind, which all chess classes have, and I can't tell anything, but the biggest special thing about Go and other chess classes is that the overall situation is coordinated, and the details are controlled. In the layout of the overall situation for strategic deployment, increase the value of the ground and air, reduce the value of the opponent's offensive looting, and then when there are more and more subs, the subs are entangled, and a move collapses and the whole game is lost, how much advantage you have in front of you can lose in the details, especially the official, it is a subtle detail control, it is not unheard of in and out of the three eyes to lose chess, chess has not been played, but I am sure that you who play chess will not consider the question of life and death after the chess pieces are entangled, and you don't have to consider investing energy for that half eye, Therefore, I dare to guarantee the complexity of absolute chess strength, and it is not a reasonable proposition to be tall, so you don't have to worry about it.

Affected by the environment, I learned Go at a very young age, and read a lot of chess books, such as "Brief Introduction to Formulas", "Mid-game Tactics", "Guanzi Common Sense", "Life and Death Research", "The Tendons and Shapes of Go", "Offensive and Defensive Skills"...I haven't taken the grade, and my friend said that there is an amateur strong second-stage level. After working in Guangdong, my friends all played chess, and I have been learning chess for several years, and with the help of computers, I have made rapid progress in learning chess.

If you want to say which of the two types of chess is higher, you can only say that you don't understand them. In order to enter the Chinese market, large Japanese and South Korean companies have invested high bonuses in order to enter the Chinese market, and the purpose is to advertise, and the players will be more ambitious in terms of rich returns. If you really know the essence of the two kinds of chess, you will find that they both have infinite profundity and charm, which is also the reason why both kinds of chess can last for thousands of years.

Go is like primitive human beings, there is no distinction between people, only race, there are no national and territorial boundaries, natural resources come first, and two tribes fight for resources. Xiangqi shows that there are modern societies, there are national borders, members of the country have status, and each member's behavior is limited by "rules", and each member can do his or her best. There is a saying:

As long as you are Chinese, you are destined to have the blood of chess flowing in your body, because anyone can say a bunch of idioms related to chess, so analyzed, chess seems to be higher.

I don't know how to play Go, I know a little bit about Chinese chess.

From the bottom of my heart, I like Chinese chess even more. Because I think Chinese chess is very exciting.

Go only has black and white characters, and only divides the enemy and our troops. If each of its pieces is compared to one person, then it can be said that all the pieces are the same, only how they are combined and how they are used.

Chinese chess is also a two-side, but it is divided into arms, and different arms have different characteristics, just like everyone in the world has their own ideological characteristics and personality.

Xiangqi chess pieces are short and concise, like a right front and right back, there is left and right, if Go is like the vast universe, then Xiangqi I think it is also like a person's body. Go stirs up the world and is unpredictable. Chess is hand-to-hand, fist-to-flesh.

In the face of a Go master, you will feel that the other party is like a natural disaster, and in the face of a Go master, you will feel that the other party is a martial arts master. Go is a battle of luck, and black and white chess pieces are like yin and yang. Chess is a battle of ability, and the chess pieces of friend and foe are like two people facing each other.

Go is like a good look, and chess is like a good doctor. Good ministers save the people, and good doctors save the sick.

There are more people who play chess than Go, and you can usually see the community masters playing chess when you go out and take a turn; Go is a small black and white round, and Xiangqi is a big round, and Go looks better than Xiangqi in terms of size and appearance.

Because there are many chess pieces, they can't be played anywhere, and the popularity is not as good as chess, so the corresponding people who play are not down-to-earth, which will make people feel tall.

Because Go is not as popular as Xiangqi, and it is more difficult to operate, it is more mysterious in the eyes of many people, and many literati prefer to play Go, so it makes people feel high.

Go is a game of interests, while chess is more like two people sending troops to fight. There are many great truths in Go, both in life and in doing things, so many people think that Go is a little more profound and more powerful than chess.

It may be that Go has high playability, few rules, and a high degree of freedom.

Go seems to be simple and easy to learn, it is difficult to refine, the chess in the qinqi calligraphy and painting refers to the game of Go, which can cultivate people's overall situation, thinking, black and white vertical and horizontal represent the way of yin and yang, it can also be said to be a dialectical contest of two kinds of thinking, teaching people how to layout, how to choose, containing the truth of life, and the realm, so as an important means of self-cultivation.

Xiangqi is a game of competitive chess with a fair binary confrontation preset, and Go will look at the effect of the two pairs of each other, and the judgment of the game ......It is more "walking", malleable, and easy to value......

There is no high or low level of chess. If you say that a certain kind of chess is elegant, you basically don't know and don't know how to play chess.

Because they don't know Go at all, chess is easy to understand and difficult to master, they know how to move chess, and they are not proficient.

One technique, one judgment.

Theoretically, you don't need to be literate to play Go, and you need to know at least a few words to play chess.

It's hard to say whether it's high or not, maybe I don't know enough about Chinese chess.

Because Go is the last chess game to be cracked by AI.

Don't look at the number of chess players playing in the streets and alleys, elementary school students who have studied chess for three or four years can kill a bunch of them. There are not many above the seventh industry.

I don't play chess or Go. Few Chinese know how to play chess, and it is higher than Go.

This question should be viewed from three aspects:

1. From the point of view of getting started, the rules of Go are extremely simple (only 5), while Xiangqi is much more complicated.

2. From the perspective of improvement, Go is much more complicated, because there are so many changes, so it is also the only chess game in the world where supercomputers cannot defeat humans. Chess, on the other hand, is much simpler.

3. From the perspective of professional chess players, the two are actually about the same, because the rules are very different, and the interlacing is like a mountain, in fact, there is no comparison between complexity and uncomplicatedness.

Chinese chess is a bit more elegant. Because Chinese chess is very difficult to learn, Chinese chess can make a person very smart and very patient.