Could it be that China listens to the United States and stops Iran from importing products?

Updated on international 2024-04-13
38 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    1. Which is more important between China-Iran relations and China-US relations, and people in their right minds know how to choose? It's crazy to turn the other cheek for Iran and the United States.

    2. China voted in favor of the UN sanctions against Iran. If not, why didn't you object to it in the first place? If you agree with it, you have to abide by it as a member state.

    3. Iran is seeking the status of its regional hegemon, not the best people who want China and Russia, and take advantage of the fire for China and Russia. Its nuclear policy has likewise displeased China and Russia.

    4. Iran is not good with all countries in the Gulf except Syria. There is no need to offend other countries for its sake.

    5. At present, Iran only imports oil to China, because the two sides are always at odds. Reducing the number of imports can put pressure on the other side, second, to avoid risks, third, to sell Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and other countries a big favor, and finally to exchange interests with the United States.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    We can't completely ignore it, after all, we also agreed to the first round of UN sanctions, and we also oppose the possession of nuclear weapons by Iran, which supports terrorism, and it is impossible not to consider the impact of Western sanctions on us. But we can't listen to it all, not only for the sake of face, but also to leave enough room for maneuver in diplomacy.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    PetroChina said it wouldn't!

    We have a legitimate relationship with Iran, and we cannot say that the United States can do whatever it is.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Of course not, we will definitely oppose what the United States says.

    We will definitely confront the United States.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    That is impossible, unless the United States docks its aircraft carrier off the coast of Iran and investigates a Chinese tanker when it sees it.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It seems to be a United Nations resolution.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    According to my estimate, China will adopt a compromise strategy, and will not tear its face with the United States without harming its own interests.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Emotionally fully support Iran and North Korea.

    The U.S. nuclear ** is enough to destroy the earth dozens of times, and no one else can study it. Typically, only the state officials are allowed to light the lamps, and the people are not allowed to prevent fire. President Hu said well at the World Nuclear Non-Proliferation Conference that China supports the denuclearization of the world, but it must be a global denuclearization, and the United States must also denuclearize.

    When the United States first developed the atomic bomb, it threatened others to use nuclear weapons every day, and no one wanted to live a life of being threatened by others.

    The United States invades other countries every day, and other countries must of course look for self-defense. If the United States does not threaten or invade other countries, who will waste money to develop a nuclear ** that has no economic value at all.

    On the one hand, the United States opposes Iran and North Korea developing nuclear weapons, but on the other hand, do you know how many nuclear weapons the United States is targeting these two countries? Of course, Iran and North Korea also enjoy their own nuclear power against the United States, so as to ensure their own security.

    The United States itself withdrew from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and studied tactical nuclear ** on its own. However, it is completely unreasonable to demand that other countries abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

    Intellectually, Iran's possession of nuclear ** should indeed be opposed. The lethality of nuclear ** is too great, and the more countries have nuclear **, the harder it is to limit the spread of nuclear technology and the use of nuclear **. China now has the same attitude, resolutely opposing the development of nuclear weapons by other countries.

    After all, nuclear ** is too powerful, and it will even threaten the survival and development of the entire human race.

    The United States wants the renminbi to appreciate, mainly because China exports too much of their stuff. If the renminbi appreciates, it will cost more dollars to buy Chinese things in dollars than it used to be. Because of the appreciation of the renminbi, the same amount of dollars can be exchanged for less renminbi.

    In layman's terms, Americans spend more dollars on Chinese products, and Chinese goods become more expensive (although ** has not changed). Chinese goods have become more expensive, and exports will inevitably decrease. The United States will be able to sell much more of its own products.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    China's relationship with Iran is good, but China is more worried about nuclear proliferation, because countries like Iran and North Korea belong to the more extreme kind, and it is a disaster for everyone to not be able to use nuclear weapons first. As for the consequences of the appreciation of the RMB, the direct manifestation is that the same RMB can be exchanged for more US dollars, of course, you can also buy more foreign goods, and at the same time, for export-oriented enterprises, the export of products in exchange for less US dollars, and these US dollars can only be exchanged for less RMB, which means that the domestic purchase of raw materials is actually rising, and the export advantage is lost, because China is a big exporter, a small importing country, this move will greatly weaken China's competitiveness. In addition, there is a large amount of foreign investment in China** and the property market, once the appreciation means that the same domestic assets can be exchanged for more US dollars, these foreign capital is likely to flee in a concentrated manner, and then it will lead to the collapse of the property market**, and then the paralysis of the entire economic system, just like Japan in the 90s of the last century.

    It is more chaotic, but the basic situation is true, China ** is very clear about this, so it has always been ambiguous on this issue, after all, China is not Japan, China's affairs are still what the Chinese say, I am afraid that there will be internal traitors.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    China wants to help Iran???

    China is a resolute opponent of nuclear proliferation!!

    China is committed to safeguarding world peace, and China strongly disagrees that the DPRK has conducted a nuclear test in disregard of the accusations of the international community!!

    If Iran were like North Korea, China should impose sanctions on Iran, and all peace-loving countries in the world will do the same!!

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    China is a two-faced player on this issue, on the one hand, to help the United States and the international community prevent Iran's nuclear proliferation, and on the other hand, to organize the United States to take the lead in the international community to impose sanctions on Iran

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    I can't fight.

    Why war serves political and commercial interests.

    There is no doubt about it.

    Attacking Iran will be politically constrained by domestic constraints and obstruction by anti-war activists, as can be seen from the Republican election defeat, and the war in Iraq has not been able to end until now, Iran is not Iraq, Iran is four times larger than Iraq, and the population is three times larger, and Iran's problems are more complicated.

    **None of them are still fighting?

    Also, in the fight against Iran, I think Britain may follow suit, which will exacerbate the isolation of the United States in its position in the Middle East.

    Of course, to fight Iran, it is naturally not an opponent of the United States. It also depends on how the United States fights. It is a light air strike on nuclear facilities.

    Or a full-scale war to occupy Iran.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Assuming that Iran does not fight guerrillas, then it will absolutely not be able to hold it First of all, the United States blitzkrieg, raids**, hospitals, military bases, power plants, military headquarters, still graphite bombs, cut off the power supply, interfere with the signal, Iran is completely paralyzed, if it fights, it can be maintained, and if it does not fight, it will be defeated.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    I agree with the foraging eagle. There are many factors that determine the success of a war, and sometimes the battlefield is unpredictable, and many unexpected things appear. From the point of view of the quality and equipment of the armed forces, as well as the strategic point of view, the United States is definitely stronger than Iran, but I think the national cohesion of the Iranian people is definitely stronger than that of the Americans.

    Not all Americans will agree with their country sending troops to Iran, but if the United States does, Iranians will be very united to defend their country. And even if the United States can capture Iran, it does not mean that they will succeed, and they may fall into a quagmire like the Iraq war. The impact on China should still be there, and the United States is now actively marching into Central Asia, and if it controls Iran one day, it feels like it is a sandwich attack on China.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    It is possible to hold it, or it is possible to hold it.

    In view of the military strength of the two sides, the American dogs have an absolute advantage. However, the factors that determine the outcome of a war are definitely not something that can be done by a few advanced countries, as well as operational theory, combat will, and so on.

    If Iran is captured. will make our country's"Backyard"Exposed to the bayonets of American dogs!

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    In fact, there is no big impact on China, at most it is the loss of some ** exports and oil resources.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    America isn't just for oil! He wants to forcibly lay down a territory in Asia and do strategic development.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Iran, which is good for the United States, will not fight.

    If you fight, it's impossible to hold it.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    I don't know. However, if the United States wins the war, it will do great harm to our country, because we have a lot of oil imported from it, and we must have oil if we want to develop. And if you look at the map, Iraq's neighbor is Iran, and Iran's neighbor is Afghanistan, so there is a great threat to the western part of our country.

    From this, it can be concluded that if the United States wants to go to war, it will have to look at us.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Iran is not Afghanistan after all, and it is not Iraq,!

    Fight Iran, the United States will not be so easy,!

    Because the consequences of hitting Iran can be severe!

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    It's again, why are you going to fight China? What are the benefits? China is now in the best interest of the United States. The relations between those countries and us that you are talking about are limited to ** relations.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    The United States can only contain China, and it is impossible for it to attack directly. Nuclear powers have always avoided war with each other, and the United States was stupid to break the tank and break down to fight a nuclear war. There can be no large-scale war between the five nuclear powers, unless the world situation changes drastically and life is too bad to last.

    This is unlikely to be the case in the next few decades. Unless the oil runs out.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    The United States feels that China has changed too much, China is getting better and better now, oil is comparable to the United States, and China's economy and GDP are very powerful, even if the developing country is already a strong country! Therefore, the United States feels that China is in danger, and it is possible to defeat the United States in the future! Other countries, such as Iraq and Pakistan, are all small countries, and the United States only wants to control them, fearing that they will adopt their desire to develop a nuclear weapon.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    China and Russia fight the United States and Japan. Pakistan Iran fights India, do you think Israel is the opponent of Britain and France, and in the event of a war, the ** provided by the United States is the most advanced... Together, it's a little choking.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Too much to analyze Only military strength China + Russia" The United States + any other country in the world Besides, strong strength does not necessarily lead to victory There are too many cases of winning more with less, such as the Battle of Guandu in China and the Battle of Chibi.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    The truth of the matter is that China, the United States and Japan; defeat of North and South Korea; defeated Russia, Britain and France; defeated Pakistan and India; defeated by Yiyi; Defeat is basically an asymmetric fiasco, and without nuclear weapons, the earth is unified.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Give China twenty years to annihilate the United States + South Korea + Japan + Britain + France + India + Israel.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    Russia may not enter the war, it may provide some military assistance, and North Korea will look at their parade so distracted... You know, Pakistan is still reliable, and Iran itself is not very good. Not to mention Britain and France every day, the combat effectiveness of the Indians is about the same as that of the DPRK, and the Israeli eighty percent do not participate.

    I'm a middle school student, and my vision is limited, so don't spray me.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    From the perspective of the Chinese, of course, it is said that the Chinese side wins, but in fact, the strength of the other side is stronger.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    Let me analyze it, according to the historical legacy and the current situation, it is best to use mathematical analysis, approximate points.

    Eli made an appointment, and they continued to fight; India and Pakistan fell, and then fought; North and South Korea will definitely fight; Britain and France may not have entered the war, so it is excluded. The rest of the Sino-Japanese war. Leave the old beauty to Russia...

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-08

    Who told you that it was divided!

    China and Russia, preemptively, nuclear weapons directly killed Japan and South Korea.

    Next, the protracted war.

    So small countries have no say.

    China and Russia are so big that it is no problem to take a few nuclear bombs.

    India, the United States, too.

  32. Anonymous users2024-01-07

    The end of the world, full of crises. Basically impossible.

  33. Anonymous users2024-01-06

    What results do you want?? Analyze what??

  34. Anonymous users2024-01-05

    There's nothing to start with, the Poor Ghost League fights the Rich League.

  35. Anonymous users2024-01-04

    The United States is not prepared to fight Iran, although Iran is indeed weak, much weaker than Iraq, but at present there is still room for diplomatic efforts, and international sanctions are also working, so the United States will not use force until the last moment. If the United States really wants to fight Iran, it will definitely do it together with Europe, and Russia will directly ignore it, and it will not be able to do anything anyway, and China will not have any way. Our Iran, which supports terrorism (including in our country), is in the first place pure ** relations, we need oil very much, they need **, that's all.

  36. Anonymous users2024-01-03

    Russia is beginning to count money. Because Iran can only import advanced ** ammunition from Russia to counter the United States.

    China can take advantage of this opportunity to remove obstacles on its doorstep.

  37. Anonymous users2024-01-02

    We want to sell guns, sell guns, sell missiles, sell airplanes, and sell **......Give them all the old equipment and get a new one. Russia is also ......

  38. Anonymous users2024-01-01

    The United States has an excuse to start a war against Iraq, and Iraq is a soft persimmon, so it is easy to pinch Saddam Hussein is working against the United States, and of course the United States will clean up Iran is harder than Iraq China, he does not dare Russia, and he does not dare There is also a floor that is not right, Iran also has a lot of oil, more than Iraq!

Related questions
7 answers2024-04-13

China currently has nearly $2 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, 80 percent of which are in dollars, 60 percent of which are U.S. Treasury bonds. China's holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds account for about 10% of its issuance, and if China makes a move, the world will be watching. It doesn't matter if you buy it, if you sell it, it will cause panic selling, and if the bonds in China's hands are not taken off, it will be substantial, and the US Treasury bonds in China's foreign exchange reserves will suffer painful losses, which is equivalent to not getting along with yourself. >>>More

17 answers2024-04-13

You are disrespectful to him. Everyone wants everyone to respect each other. >>>More

17 answers2024-04-13

A: 14000 km. The straight-line distance from China to the United States is about 14,000 kilometers. >>>More

2 answers2024-04-13

According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), an alien species is a population established in natural and semi-natural ecosystems and habitats, and when it alters and endangers native biodiversity, it is an invasive alien species, and the harm it causes is an alien biological invasion. The invasion of alien species mainly harms in several aspects: one is to cause a decline in agricultural and forestry products, output value and quality, and increase costs; second, it has an impact on biodiversity, especially encroaching on the living space of native species, resulting in the death and endangerment of native species; The third is the impact on human and animal health [1]. >>>More